[ncdnhc-discuss] Reuters: U.S. Should Control Internet Body, Senator Says

[James Love]

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20020611/pl_nm/tech_icann_
dc_2

U.S. Should Control Internet Body, Senator Says
Tue Jun 11,12:28 AM ET
By Andy Sullivan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. senator said he would try to rein in the group
that oversees the Internet's traffic system, calling for a more direct U.S.
government role in the ostensibly international and independent body.

Sen. Conrad Burns, a Montana Republican, on Monday said he likely would
introduce a bill to require the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers, also known by its acronym ICANN ( news - web sites), to give the
U.S. government more influence in managing the domain-name system. The
system lets Internet users navigate the Web with easy-to-remember names like
" www.example.com."

If ICANN failed to cooperate, Burns said, it could be stripped of its
authority when its contract comes up for renewal this fall.

In a statement released two days before a Senate subcommittee is scheduled
to hold hearings on the global body, Burns said the change was necessary
because ICANN has exceeded its authority, does not operate in an open
fashion, and is dangerously unaccountable to Internet users, businesses and
other key interest groups.

"The U.S. needs to ensure ICANN operates with the same sort of internal
processes as in any other federal agency," he said.

ICANN is not a part of the U.S. government, but operates under a 1998
contract with the Department of Commerce that requires it to meet several
conditions before it assumes full control of the domain-name system.

But it is uncertain whether ICANN will ever meet those conditions and obtain
full control, according to a congressional investigator's prepared testimony
obtained by Reuters.

Criticism of ICANN comes from many quarters, not just U.S. politicians.
Dozens of other governments have charged ICANN with being too dominated by
U.S. interests, while the domain-name industry and grass-roots
"cybercitizens" have raised their own grievances.

PROGRESS SLOW ON MANY FRONTS

ICANN has introduced competition into the domain-name business, driving down
Web-site registration prices from around $50 to $10, according to testimony
prepared by Peter Guerrero, a director of the General Accounting Office (
news - web sites), the investigative arm of Congress.

But it has made little progress toward fulfilling other requirements such as
boosting security of the domain-name system and setting up an inclusive
governance process, Guerrero said.

ICANN has made little progress in formalizing relationships with other
volunteer groups that oversee aspects of the domain-name system, he said.

"Until these issues are resolved, the timing and eventual outcome of the
transition effort remain highly uncertain, and ICANN's legitimacy and
effectiveness as the private-sector manager of the domain-name system remain
in question," Guerrero said in his written testimony.

Guerrero also took the Department of Commerce to task for what he called its
informal, hands-off approach to ICANN oversight, and recommended that
Commerce issue periodic progress reports.

ICANN President M. Stuart Lynn declined to comment on Burns' proposal,
saying he would wait until the bill was actually introduced.

"We respect Sen. Burns' interest in ICANN, and we'll have to see what
evolves," said Lynn, who is scheduled to testify on Wednesday before the
Senate science, technology and space subcommittee, on which Burns sits.

Lynn said Commerce exercises considerable oversight, noting that the group
cannot add new "top-level" domains to join the likes of ".com" without the
federal agency's approval.

A Commerce official declined to comment ahead of the hearing, when Assistant
Secretary Nancy Victory is also scheduled to testify.

ICANN has struggled over the past several years to figure out exactly how it
should function and who should participate. After direct elections open to
any Internet user filled five of 19 board seats, the board of directors in
March ruled out further elections.

An official reform committee released its blueprint last week, which will be
considered when ICANN next meets at the end of the month in Romania.


_______________________________________________
Random-bits mailing list
Random-bits at lists.essential.org
http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/random-bits


--------------------------------
James Love mailto:james.love at cptech.org
http://www.cptech.org +1.202.387.8030 mobile +1.202.361.3040