[ncdnhc-discuss] Request for cost ofAuerbach litigation denied

[todd glassey]

All costs have to be filed in a quarterly manner with the State and from
that point onward they are public information. I think also that their
refusal to expose themselves to the people they supposedly represent is
grounds for attacking their corporate status with the state of California.

Who would sing a petition demanding the disclosure of this info?

Todd

----- Original Message -----
From: "J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey at club-internet.fr>
To: "James Love" <james.love at cptech.org>; "NCDNHC-discuss list"
<discuss at icann-ncc.org>
Cc: <karl at cavebear.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] Request for cost ofAuerbach litigation denied


> At 14:15 09/07/02, James Love wrote:
> >Apart from any other consideration, on the advice of counsel we do
> >not provide any public information, financial or otherwise, connected
> >with ongoing litigation, other than what is presented to the
> >appropriate court of jurisdiction. Stuart
>
> it confirms that the information disclosed by Joe Sims on the GA is part
of
> what is intended to be presented to the court. And that his ad hominem
> sentences are part of a plan for the responses to be used. The countrary
> would have been surprising. jfc
>
>
>