[ncdnhc-discuss] Consumer Protection resolution

[Milton Mueller]

Jamie:
Currently the DNSO has a Task force on domain name
transfers which deals directly and in excruciating detail
with consumer protection issues related to transfering names
between registrars. 

I am the NCDNHC representative on that TF. After the
elections, I will be willing to continue serving in that capacity
if the new Adcom/NC reps want me to. If they don't, perhaps
you will come forward as a volunteer. Or you can replace
me anyway if you take a keen interest in it.

There are likely to be additional TFs and Names Council votes
related to consumer protection issues in the future. 
(see my ICANNWatch article at 
http://www.icannwatch.org/article.php?sid=537&mode=thread&order=0

In sum, your resolution is a bit too general. The dialogue on
consumer protection in domain names has advanced in detail
and technical sophistication. If we want to be a part of it we
need to keep up with what the registrars are discussing.
--MM

>>> "James Love" <love at cptech.org> 02/07/02 05:24PM >>>
I'm not sure if this went through the first time I sent it, so forgive me if this is duplicate.  Jamie
-------
Proposed NCDNHC resolution on consumer protection and domain name registration.
February 7, 2002
Proposed by James Love


1.	Historically domain name registration and operation was a not for profit operation, but over time the operation of registrars and registries is increasingly a commercial activity.   The businesses that operate such registries charge fees and have policies on renewals, privacy and service that are important to the domain name holders.  

2.	Over time, persons who use domains often make considerable investments of time or money in marketing or publicizing the domain, and may have an important interest in third party hypertext links to the domain.   Persons who use the web also have an interest in stable URLs, which make it easier to maintain and use various reference materials.

3.	Domain name registries or registrars could exploit domain name owner "lock-in" by offering poor service or high prices.

4.	ICANN needs to assess the nature of consumer protection problems faced by domain name owners, and also to determine if the ICANN contracts with registries or registrars or government oversight provide sufficient remedies to protect domain name owners from price gouging or poor service.


-------------
James Love, mailto:love at cptech.org 
+1.202.387.8030, mobile +1.202.361.3040
http://www.cptech.org 

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at icann-ncc.org 
http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss