[ncdnhc-discuss] Names Council agenda item request: discussionof wholesale price for names

[J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin]

On 05:43 29/08/02, Adam Peake said:
>>I oppose. If the problem is absence of new TLDs why not call for them to 
>>add more instead?
>
>Because we've done that before and it's not got anywhere.  There's an 
>ongoing President's committee looking at the introduction of new TLDs. If 
>you think ICANN is doing a good job with the current wholesale price 
>mechanism, just say so.

I certainly say that CIANN is doing a perfect job for the mission they 
received. Their job is not that simple due to the general situation of the 
industry but roughly they obtained full US dominance on the world packet 
swicth and URL systems, making it now to last in being self funded (ISOC 
getting .org).

They still have to clean the aftermath of their operation: to get rid of 
the @large remnants, of the independant Registrars, of the pseudo 
constituencies (BC, NCC) and eventually to bore out GAC members.

Certainly a well done job. Very neat. And quickly completed. Very 
professionnal. In full respect with Congress 1996 orders (USC). I suggest 
all the concerned people to be promoted.
jfc