[ncdnhc-discuss] The NCDNHC's .org report is numerically inconsistent.

Thomas Roessler roessler at does-not-exist.org
Tue Aug 20 20:39:46 CEST 2002


On 2002-08-20 14:14:55 -0400, Milton Mueller wrote:

>The "real" numbers were in a spreadsheet which automatically 
>tallied the total according to the weightings. In the process of 
>transferring the results in the spreadsheet to a Word document 
>table, a typographical error was made, and GNR was given a 5 in 
>"Relationship with Community" when it actually received a 4. 

OK.  Now, what about the error in ISOC's score?

>The original spreadsheet was delivered to ICANN as Annex 5. The  
>title of the Excel file was "rank-calc.xls" On the worksheet  
>entitled "Echelle 2" can be found the correct numbers. 

The PDF document I've been looking at contains an Annex 5 on pages 
43-49, and that one contains the further errors I pointed out in my 
original message.

-- 
Thomas Roessler                        <roessler at does-not-exist.org>



More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list