[ncdnhc-discuss] The NCDNHC's .org report is numerically inconsistent.
Thomas Roessler
roessler at does-not-exist.org
Tue Aug 20 20:39:46 CEST 2002
On 2002-08-20 14:14:55 -0400, Milton Mueller wrote:
>The "real" numbers were in a spreadsheet which automatically
>tallied the total according to the weightings. In the process of
>transferring the results in the spreadsheet to a Word document
>table, a typographical error was made, and GNR was given a 5 in
>"Relationship with Community" when it actually received a 4.
OK. Now, what about the error in ISOC's score?
>The original spreadsheet was delivered to ICANN as Annex 5. The
>title of the Excel file was "rank-calc.xls" On the worksheet
>entitled "Echelle 2" can be found the correct numbers.
The PDF document I've been looking at contains an Annex 5 on pages
43-49, and that one contains the further errors I pointed out in my
original message.
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler at does-not-exist.org>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list