[ncdnhc-discuss] Fwd: [announce] NC teleconf minutes July 24, 2002

Erick Iriarte Ahon faia at amauta.rcp.net.pe
Thu Aug 1 17:25:31 CEST 2002


>From: "DNSO Secretariat" <DNSO.secretariat at dnso.org>
>To: <announce at dnso.org>
>Subject: [announce] NC teleconf minutes July 24, 2002
>Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:20:51 +0200
>
>
>
>[To: ga at dnso.org; anounce at dnso.org]
>[To: liaison7c at dnso.org]
>
>         DNSO Names Council Teleconference on 24 July 2002 - minutes
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>25 July 2002.
>
>Proposed agenda and related documents
>http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20020617.NCteleconf-agenda.html
>
>List of attendees:
>
>Elisabeth Porteneuve   ccTLD
>Oscar Robles Garay     ccTLD absent, apologies,proxy to Elisabeth Porteneuve
>Philip Sheppard        Business
>Marilyn Cade           Business
>Grant Forsyth          Business
>Greg Ruth              ISPCP  absent
>Antonio Harris         ISPCP
>Tony Holmes            ISPCP absent, apologies, proxy to Tony Harris
>Philipp Grabensee      Registrars
>Ken Stubbs             Registrars
>Bruce Tonkin           Registrars
>Roger Cochetti         gTLD
>Jordyn Buchanan        gTLD
>Cary Karp              gTLD
>Ellen Shankman         IP
>Laurence Djolakian     IP
>J. Scott Evans         IP absent, apologies, proxy Ellen Shankman, Laurence
>Djolakian
>Harold Feld            NCDNH
>Chun Eung Hwi          NCDNH
>Erick Iriate           NCDNH
>
>16 Names Council Members
>
>Louis Touton           ICANN Staff
>
>Glen de Saint Géry     NC Secretary
>Philippe Renaut          MP3 Recording Engineer/Secretariat
>
>MP3 recording of the meeting by the Secretariat:
>http://www.dnso.org/dnso/mp3/20020724.NCteleconf.mp3
>
>Quorum present at 15:10 (all times reported are CET which is UTC + 2 during
>summer time in the northern hemisphere).
>
>Philip Sheppard chaired this NC teleconference.
>
>Approval of the Agenda
>http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20020724.NCteleconf-agenda.html
>The agenda was approved with a proposal by Ken Stubbs to discuss the NC
>chair elections.
>
>Decision 2: Secretariat will post an election schedule for the next NC
>teleconference on August 1, 2002.
>
>Item 1. Summary of last meeting:
>
>http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20020711.NCteleconf-minutes.html
>
>Ken Stubbs moved the adoption of the minutes seconded by Ellen Shankman,
>The motion was carried.
>
>Decision 2: Motion adopted.
>
>Item 3: Wait Listing Service - report and vote to adopt
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc10/msg00378.html
>IPC statement:
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc10/msg00380.html
>gTLD statement:
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc10/msg00381.html
>Supporting material and substantive submissions on WLS
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc10/msg00382.html
>Marilyn Cade invited Louis Touton be on the call and welcomed him.
>She reported that the report content had not changed but the format
>corresponded to the NC procedures.
>The additional statements and supporting material would be incorporated into
>the report to be sent to the Board.
>She walked through a summary of the final report and the recommendations
>that people actually voted on.
>
>Discussion: Harold Feld asked if the summary of general comments appear in
>the report. It was confirmed that they were in III 3.
>
>Philip Sheppard proposed voting on the report as a whole.
>
>Further discussions after the recommmendation summary questioned the
>procedural process and Roger Cochetti said that the Task Force should not
>bind or restrict the Names Council. He went on to suggest that the elements
>should be voted on rather than the whole.
>Bruce Tonkin askedwhich of the several WLS versions were referred to in the
>report. Marilyn Cade suggested that Chuck Gomes would be asked to approve
>the version.
>To a question from Ellen Shankman as to what would happen if the Board would
>go ahead after a no vote from the Task Force, Louis Touton explained he
>believed that putting forward the views of the various parts of the
>community was more important than attempting to characterize those views in
>terms of whether they constituted consensus.
>Voting in the Task Force itself was discussed and it was felt that
>questioning the Task Force composition at this stage was inappropiate.
>However the eligibility of constituencies to vote or participate in the case
>where they were not directly affected was questioned and Louis Touton said
>that the exclusion of constituency representatives from voting in the NC
>would present concerns under the by-laws. Constituency votes can be taken
>conditionally and reported to the Board.
>
>Ken Stubbs expressed concern about the section on cost, particularly the
>specific participation of the ccTLDs in this vote and proposed a friendly
>amendment to remove that recommendation. Grant Forsyth said that price is a
>key issue and is properly considered and reported.
>Louis Touton said that a principle for establishing price caps
>was being put forward in the current version of report which gained support,
>but that no position on the specific price was being stated.
>
>He went on to say that in terms of utility to the Board it would be useful
>to know if the Names Council feels the report does not appropiately and
>accurately reflect the views of the constituencies as this would be an
>important consideration from the Board.
>
>Philip Sheppard moved for a vote of adoption for the report as a whole.
>
>15 voted in favour, 3 voted against (gTLD constituency) 1 abstention and
>Greg Ruth was absent, no proxy given.
>
>The motion carried.
>Decision 3: Report adopted
>
>Roger Cochetti stated after the vote that it should be noted that the gTLD
>constituency feels that the Task Force and Names Council have gone way
>beyond their proper role in policy matters.
>
>Item 5: Status of 2002 fees
>
>The ISPCP constituency reporteded that they were in the process of
>collecting members' fees, and, due to the holidays, expected to be able to
>provide a payment date by the end of August.
>The non-commercials had received the appropiate invoices and were
>distributing them.
>The gTLD constituency said that they had the intent to pay but could not
>give a date.
>
>Item 4: ICANN Reform and proposed Resolution.
>This was deferred to the next meeting
>
>The teleconference ended at 16:30
>
>Next NC teleconference will be on Thursday August 1 at 15:00 Paris time,
>13:00 UTC/GMT
>
>      See all past agendas and minutes at
>      http://www.dnso.org/dnso/2002calendardnso.html
>      and calendar of the NC meetings at
>      http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2002.NC-calendar.html
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  Information from:  © DNSO Names Council




More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list