[ncdnhc-discuss] ICANN Reform: Role of ITU

[Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law]

More gridlock, if you ask me.  The instinct is correct - the system
should be self-policing.  But not in a way that defaults to paralysis.  

On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, James Love wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alejandro Pisanty - DGSCA y FQ, UNAM" <apisan at servidor.unam.mx>
> > do you think of a body better than ICANN able to restrain the ITU from
> > overreaching?
> 
> I think Alejandro has a good point.  An agreement between ICANN and the ITU
> over ICANN policy making boundaries might restrain both parties.   Jamie
> 
> --------------------------------
> James Love mailto:james.love at cptech.org
> http://www.cptech.org +1.202.387.8030 mobile +1.202.361.3040
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 

-- 
		Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin at law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                        -->It's hot here.<--