[ncdnhc-discuss] Names council candidates

[Dany Vandromme]

James Love wrote:
> 
> It would seem that the issues concerning the election of the at large
> board members would be pretty important.  This is the only thing that
> seems to make ICANN remotely accountable to the Internet community.
> Jamie
> 
-
1) Accountability would be certainly better achieved if there is some
natural link or channel between the elected AL board members and the
voting base. This is aimed in the ALSC proposal. It is certainly not
achieved today with the current process, in which the at-large role is
only to vote once a while. There is no point to fight for 9 Al directors
if there is no mechanism for accountability. 

2) From others' contibution, there is a big confusion between the
NCDNHC, which is made (supposely) from non-commercial ORGANISATIONS, and
the At-Large which is made from individuals. If NCDNHC starts to behaves
like an At-Large, that would mean that the constituency is voiced only
by individuals rather than organizations.

Dany
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER

                Reseau National de Telecommunications
         pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche

                                  |  ENSAM
Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
E-mail: Dany.Vandromme at renater.fr |  FRANCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------