[ncdnhc-discuss] Resolution on ORG Divestiture

[Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales]

Milton:

--- Milton Mueller <Mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
> Vany:
> The link you show below shows that the 
> constituency discussions clearly "oppose 
> any evictions" and "urge that .org remain
> an unrestricted domain."
Still is it not an official position yet.
Lets develop and official position.

 
> In addition to that process on the list
> back in June, I engaged in direct consultations 
> with a broad spectrum of North American 
> groups in late July and early August.
> The results confirmed that position,
> and was forwarded to the list. There
> was no opposition expressed on 
> the list.
This was understood by others, as me, as something
organized by North Americans only.  Of course there's no opposition
on the list that North Americans develops their own position.
The members never voted on North American position, so such
document still remains as a North American position, and not
a position of the NCDNHC as a whole.
 
> While I was conducting North American
> consultations, I invited you to 
> hold regional consultations in
> Latin America. Did you?
Milton, you are G'd blessed with money, with resources as many
North American organizations that can afford to travel everytime
that the North American representative of the NC wants to hold
regional consultations in Washington or somewhere else.
Sadly neither I, neither the African representative, I don't know about
European neither Asian, have the same good luck.  

> In fact, during the Names Council ORG
> Task Force process, members of two
> other constituencies praised the consultation
> work we did, and the reason an NCDNHC
> member was chosen to lead the TF in the
> first place was because of our initial
> work in developing a position, which 
> far exceeded anything other 
> constituencies had done.
You said it:  Initial Position!!!  This position it is not valid yet. 
And
as a way of respect to our members and to the people outside the NCDNHC
that receives 
such documents that are not official positions of the NCDNHC, lets
officialize and formalize
such positions.  The only way aprooved in our charter to officialize and
formalize any position
is by holding a legimit vote.
 
> We can formally express our 
> support for the .ORG positions when
> we discuss the Marina del Rey 
> resolution, and when there is an
> online vote afterwards.
This document has to be voted paragraph by paragraph!!!  
Nothing says that we have to aproove or disaproove a whole document
when we are partially agree with some statement and other's we are not
agree, and we have the right to agree in the paragraph we are agree
and we have the right to disagree in the paragraph we are disagree.

Milton, we have to learn to be formal in our work.  Be formal it means
to follow the proper process and officialize things, The members has the
right to decide every issue that affects the Non-Commercial sector and
even has the right to decides what affects and what doesn't affects the
Non-Commercial sector.  We the AdCom has a high and important task to
organize such proper process of consultation and votation and we have
the duty to assure that such rights of vote in all issues relevant to
the NCDNHC be executed.

Best Regards
Vany




-- 
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
Information Technology Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
Tel: (507) 317-0169
http://www.sdnp.org.pa
e-mail:  vany at sdnp.org.pa