[ncdnhc-discuss] .biz rollout further delayed

[David Corish]

Your writing is "simple and clear", and English is my native language.  I've
confused nothing, least of all what you're about!

Corish
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
To: David Corish <corish at earthlink.net>
Cc: NCC Discuss list (E-mail) <discuss at icann-ncc.org>
Date: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] .biz rollout further delayed


>At 07:37 AM 10/19/2001, David Corish wrote:
>>To overlook another Neulevel delay as "...nothing at all...", is certainly
>
>David, I apologize.  I thought English was your native language and that my
>writing was simple and clear.
>
>Apparently you have confused my comment about the information content of
>your own statement with a non-existent comment about factual matters
>pertaining to NeuLevel's delay.
>
>"Nothing at all" pertains to your information -- that is, to your lack of
>it -- not to NeuLevel's situation.
>
>You stated you had no information.  Hence your statements were quite simply
>nothing other than baseless conjecture.  Among friends having a casual
>discussion, that sort of comment would be fine.  In a formal forum that is
>supposed to be doing constructive work, it is at best irresponsible.
>
>
>>   For a registry to
>>seek additional delay(s) AFTER the originally scheduled rollout, only
shows
>>they didn't test there system adequately in advance.  You disagree here?
>
>Ahhh.  Thank you.  This highlights the problem very nicely.  You apparently
>do not have much experience doing testing and even less experience with
>aggressive deadlines.
>
>Yes, I disagree.
>
>To provide a simple example of the deficiency in your view, I will suggest
>that you plan for every possible thing that will happen tomorrow.  You are
>allowed to have no surprises.  None.  You have lived for years, so of
>course you know what will happen tomorrow.  Right?
>
>
>>If you're privy to the real reason Neulevel seeks another two week delay,
>>perhaps you'll share it with us and prove me wrong.
>
>Another error, this time with logic.
>
>You do not get to make baseless claims and then lay out a challenge for
>someone to prove you wrong.  The usual example to demonstrate this problem
>is to challenge you to prove that you do not beat your spouse.  (Remember
>that getting your spouse to state that you do not beat them is not proof,
>since you might have coerced them.)
>
>When making a claim, the burden of responsibility is on the person making
>the claim.
>
>In other words, you.
>
>d/
>
>----------
>Dave Crocker  <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
>Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
>tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.273.6464
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss