[ncdnhc-discuss] Re: [ga] Comments from JPNIC and JPRS

[Jefsey Morfin]

Michael, rises an important and urgent point here to be addressed in the 
context to the coming MR meeting on Security. Obviously our Security is at 
stake.

The points that Michael rises are well taken and there are many others. 
Recently the NZNIC documented that 10% of their budget was spent on the 
ICANN as a protective budget from fear that if they did not attend they 
might learn by chance a decision affecting dramatically their bsuiness - 
may be a redelegation as in the auDA case?

Security and stability is necessry inside if we want to insure security and 
stability outside. The current atmosphere of uncertainity maintained by the 
Staff and BoD may appeal on a few but is another secuirty hole in the ICANN 
system.

Thank you Michael, I will certainly propose to add this to the ICP-4 
Internet Security and Network Stability document preparatory discussion list.
Jefsey


On 01:39 09/10/01, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law said:
>As an abstract matter Alejandro's advice on prioritizing is very sound.
>
>In a well-run ICANN it would be even sounder.
>
>But this is an ICANN in which an ICP-3 can spring full-blown from the brow
>of the staff without warning, or an official comment period. (Cf.
>http://www.icannwatch.org/article.php?sid=241).  Or a country-code
>redelegation policy is changed without notice, and redelegations taken
>without notice or comment.  (Cf.
>http://www.icannwatch.org/article.php?sid=336.) We are never safe here
>from surprises.  Under the circumstances, it is very hard to take this
>good advice, as it means we are perpetually left out of the important
>decisions.  I really don't know what to do about this - we lose if we
>waste time on irrelevancies, and we lose if we follow the rules.
>
>On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Alejandro Pisanty - CUAED y FQ, UNAM wrote:
>
> > Marc,
> >
> > you are not mistaken in that I am indeed a member of the Board. You are
> > somewhat mistaken if you think that I ignore altroots.
> >
> > As this branch discussion develops I feel that we must either focus it on
> > a NCDNHC point of view, preferrably apt for the upcoming meeting, or go
> > back to apply our attention to the matters where a prompt resolution is
> > required. Unless someone else feels the pressing need...
> >
> > Alejandro Pisanty
> >
> >
> > 
> ..  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
> >      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> > UNAM  -  Educacion Abierta y a Distancia
> > Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
> > Tel. (+52-5) 622-8713, 622-8633 Fax 550-8405
> >
> > http://www.cuaed.unam.mx
> > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, www.isocmex.org.mx, www.isoc.org
> > =====>>> Participa en ICANN, www.icann.org
> > ---->> Internet y Sociedad? www.istf.org
> > 
> ..  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> > http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
>
>--
>[Note: I killfile Cr*cker, Kr*spin, JW*lliams]
>
>                 Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
>A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin at law.tm
>U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
>+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
>                        -->It's cool here.<--
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss