[ncdnhc-discuss] TLDs not created by ICANN: the purposes of raising concerns
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
vany at sdnp.org.pa
Sun Oct 7 20:38:41 CEST 2001
Hi Barbara:
Thanks for asking. As I answered to Milton in my e-mail replying to
him...
http://www.icann-ncc.org/pipermail/discuss/2001-October/000333.html
"The idea, is that if the NC finds that is a subject important for them,
then make the proper consultation to their constituencies to make a
position statement, if not...then, I made my try. And let me remember
you
that when I brought into the attention of NC this issue, I made it as a
personal concern and exposed the possible sectors affected according to
my
view"
Best Regards
Vany
Barbara Simons wrote:
>
> Dear Vany,
> Are you representing the ncdnhc constituency in this,
> or are you expressing your own opinion? If you are
> representing us, could you please provide us with some
> reference, eg a vote, whereby the constituency has
> demonstrated that we share your concerns?
> Thanks.
> Barbara
>
> Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales wrote:
>
> > Dear Fellows:
> >
> > Due to the recent concerns about issues raised by me regarding "TLDs not
> > created by ICANN..." in the NC agenda, the below text
> > is the explanation of the purpose of the inclusion of such a subject,
> > which it is, indeed the develop of the what I want to say during the NC
> > teleconference.
> >
> > The purpose to raise concerns in the Names Council about "TLDs not
> > created by ICANN..." is to create an awareness of how
> > such business is affecting in several ways the sectors represented by
> > all DNSO Constituencies and all Registrants, to point out the
> > risks that can imply to welcome companies that offers such TLDs who
> > bypassed ICANN Process, how unfair is this (the business of offering
> > TLDs not created by ICANN) for our DNSO partners in constituencies as
> > gTLDs, ccTLDs and Registrars (no competitiveness since such TLDs only
> > can be offered by the company that promotes them) since they are making
> > their efforts to always be in good standing with ICANN processes while
> > others are not...How this could obligates ISPs if they eventually
> > doesn't changes
> > their configuration files of their DNS server in order to meet customer
> > demands...To point out how Businesses and Non-Commercial sectors are
> > affected since such constituencies cannot watch the interests of such
> > sectors properly if any policy or even technical issue regarding Domain
> > Names inside such TLDs not created by ICANN is addressed in the
> > DNSO...To point out how the Registrant doesn't have any guarantees
> > neither have a place to complain inside the ICANN structure (as, for
> > example, that ICANN recieves complaints of Registrants about Registrars
> > by giving a following up of such complaints)...All of these in order to
> > raise an awareness that the NC members recognize the importance of all
> > of these in order that be addressed in each constituency so every
> > constituency comes up with positions regarding this way to attempt to
> > expand Domain Names space without following the proper process given by
> > ICANN.
> >
> > Also to remind them that, at the end, the damage is done to the
> > Registrant who is trusting that such TLDs are legimit TLDs as .COM,
> > .ORG, .NET, .BIZ, .INFO, etc...
> >
> > And finally to make a call to ICANN through DNSO to all work together in
> > how we can find a solution to stop the disemination of this practice in
> > order to offer a Domain Name Space that keeps its stability,
> > transparency and confuseless that until now, had being achieved.
> >
> > Any attempt to expand the Domain Names Space without the ICANN
> > Coordination/Requirements is an attempt to disrupt the stability of the
> > Domain Name Space and also is bypassing all of those people, groups and
> > organizations that in good will is participating and following ICANN
> > guidelines and requirements for a better Coordination of the Domain
> > Names Space of the Internet.
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Vany
--
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
Information Technology Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
Tel: (507) 317-0169
http://www.sdnp.org.pa
e-mail: vany at sdnp.org.pa
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list