[ncdnhc-discuss] Names Council Task Force ORG policy

[Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales]

Hi Adam, Barbara and all:

I am member of the Intake Commitee.  I also consider important the subject of the CEDRP.

I will propose this subject for the agenda of the next f2f NC meeting!

In the meanwhile I propose that the NCDNHC also includes in its agenda of work the CEDRP
and be proactive as the NCDNHC was with the UDRP.

Best Regards
Vany


Barbara Simons wrote:

> I support Adam's request, and I urge readers to look
> at Michael Froomkin's article, which I just read.  In
> case you deleted that email, it's at
> http://www.icannwatch.org/article.php?sid=355
> Regards,
> Barbara
>
> Adam Peake wrote:
>
> > >Surely you jest.  Almost nothing in the new gTLD contracts springs from
> > >any process other than Louis Touton.
> >
> > Then I ask our Adcom members to add the CEDRP as an emergency item
> > for discussion during the next NC meeting?
> >
> > There must be space on the agenda as everyone seems to agree that the
> > GA chair item is a silly formality (including the names council
> > chair.)  Quite a few NC members were more than a little put out when
> > Verisign contract negotiations bypassed the DNSO, this seems no less
> > of a slight.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > Adam Peake
> > GLOCOM  Tokyo
> >
> > >Although touted as 'template' agreements and 'models' they were negotiated
> > >in secret, with strong-arm tactics and without any input from affected
> > >third parties.
> > >
> > >Exhibit A for What's Wrong With ICANN.
> > >
> > >cf. http://www.icannwatch.org/article.php?sid=355
> > >
> > >On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Adam Peake wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  >I support ORG being sponsored and unrestricted.  But, is it a good
> > >>  >idea at this stage to deny any opportunity for innovation wrt some
> > >>  >kind of restriction beyond end user choice?
> > >>  >
> > >  > >What is a "CEDRP"
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  Someone kindly answered my question:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >><http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/sponsored/sponsorship-agmt-att12-08sep01.htm>
> > >>
> > >>   From which consensus policy did this piece of work come from?  I
> > >>  thought the DNSO organized a couple of working groups on IP issues
> > >>  and new TLDs, and there's a UDRP task force ongoing now. There was
> > >>  absolutely nothing like this in any work I remember.
> > >>
> > >>  Thanks,
> > >>
> > >>  Adam
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  >Thanks,
> > >>  >
> > >>  >Adam
> > >>  >
> > >>  >
> > >>  >
> > >>  >>This is the draft of the policy that will go out for public comment.
> > >>  >>The NC Task Force has been working together reasonably well.
> > >>  >>There are some possible tensions around the issue of
> > >>  >>marketing restrictions on registrars, but on the whole everyone
> > >>  >>seems to buy into the specific approach here. You comments
> > >>  >  >welcome.
> > >>  >  >
> > >>  _______________________________________________
> > >>  Discuss mailing list
> > >>  Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> > >>  http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >>
> > >
> > >--
> > >               Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
> > >A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin at law.tm
> > >U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
> > >+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  | http://www.law.tm
> > >                  -->It's very hot and humid here.<--
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> > http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

--
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
Information Technology Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
e-mail: vany at sdnp.org.pa
http://www.sdnp.org.pa