[ncdnhc-discuss] 0:79 [004F] UNION

[Jim Fleming]

http://www.dnso.org/dnso/dnsocomments/comments-dotorg/Arc01/msg00004.html
"The ICFTU has a particular concern on this issue, because when one day (we
live in hope!) the new TLD process is eventually re-opened, and the ".union"
proposal is reviewed"

http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
0:79 [004F] UNION

http://root-dns.org/VueDig/VueDig_tld.php?record=NS&tld=UNION
Analysis : Top Level Domain UNION exists.

The PacificRoot : 204.107.129.2
VueDig Results : Answer = 9 : Authority = 0 : Additional = 9.
UNION. 2D IN NS ns.re-lab.lv.
UNION. 2D IN NS ns7.autono.net.
UNION. 2D IN NS root8.autono.net.
UNION. 2D IN NS ns.autono.net.
UNION. 2D IN NS ns1.autono.net.
UNION. 2D IN NS mediafilter.org.
UNION. 2D IN NS root3.autono.net.
UNION. 2D IN NS ns00.root-zone.net.
UNION. 2D IN NS mila.ljudmila.org.

----------------------------------

It all boils down to fairness.
Which list do you think is more fair ?
The "toy" IPv4 Internet Early Experimentation Allocations ?
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
or
The Proof-of-Concept IPv8 Allocations ?
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt

Why would people pay for Address Space, when it is FREE ?

Jim Fleming
http://www.DOT-BIZ.com
http://www.in-addr.info
3:219 INFO