[ncdnhc-discuss] Fw: [Diffserv] diffserv PIB: a question to the WG

[Jim Fleming]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Fleming" <jfleming at anet.com>
To: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian at hursley.ibm.com>; "Kwok-Ho Chan" <khchan at nortelnetworks.com>
Cc: "Andrew Smith" <ah_smith at acm.org>; "Diff Serv" <diffserv at ietf.org>; "Bert Wijnen" <bwijnen at lucent.com>; "Randy Bush"
<randy at psg.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Diffserv] diffserv PIB: a question to the WG


> http://www.google.com/search?q=foreign+espionage+act
>
> THE ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE ACT OF 1996: THE THEFT OF TRADE ...
> ... be cited as the "Economic Espionage Act of 1996.". ... Section 1831 Economic espionage. ... the
> offense will benefit any foreign government, foreign instrumentality, or ...
> www.execpc.com/~mhallign/federal.html - 13k - Cached - Similar pages
>
> THE ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE ACT OF 1996: THE THEFT OF TRADE ...
> ... were transported in "interstate or foreign commerce" and that the defendant knew ... reasons
> for enacting the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 was to fill these ...
> www.execpc.com/~mhallign/crime.html - 19k - Cached - Similar pages
> [ More results from www.execpc.com ]
>
> 18 USC 90 - Economic Espionage Act of 1996
> ... as the "Economic Espionage Act of 1996". ... 1831. Economic espionage. (a) In General.--
> Whoever ... will benefit any foreign government, foreign instrumentality, or ...
> www.tscm.com/USC18_90.html - 13k - Cached - Similar pages
>
> NCIX - Economic Espionage Act of 1996
> ... be cited as the "Economic Espionage Act of 1996.". ... 1831. Economic Espionage. ... the offense
> will benefit any foreign government, foreign instrumentality, or foreign ...
> www.nacic.gov/pubs/eea_96.htm - 27k - Cached - Similar pages
>
> The Economic Espionage Act of 1996
> ... expect, a significant amount of foreign economic espionage occurs outside of the
> United States. Under Section 1837 of the Act, a foreign corporation that sells ...
> www.carolinapatents.com/ts_articles/trade_secret4.htm - 29k - Cached - Similar pages
>
> Foreign Economic and Industrial Espionage Remains A Threat in ...
> ... employee. This case marks the first conviction of foreign individuals or a foreign
> company that has gone to trial under the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. The ...
> www.fas.org/irp/ops/ci/docs/fy99.htm - 8k - Cached - Similar pages
>
> security resource net's intelligence community
> ... Held Companies; Uniform Trade Secrets Act; 1998 Annual Report to Congress on Foreign
> Economic Collection and Industrial Espionage; 1997 Annual Report to Congress ...
> nsi.org/Intelligence.html - 10k - Cached - Similar pages
>
> Despite passage of the 1996 Economic Espionage Act, the FBI ...
> ... Despite passage of the 1996 Economic Espionage Act, the FBI says foreign spies have
> stepped up their attacks on US-based companies, and a new national survey ...
> www.infowar.com/class_2/class2_011498b.html-ssi - 13k - Cached - Similar pages
>
> Article: The Economic Espionage Act of 1996
> ... 1839. Definitions. 1831. Economic Espionage (a) In General: Whoever ... foreign instrumentality,
> or foreign agent, knowingly-- (1 ... persons do any act to effect the ...
> www.brinkshofer.com/resources/eea_act.cfm - 10k - Cached - Similar pages
>
> FindLaw: CyberSpace Law Center: Crimes: Economic Espionage Act
> ... for the record on allied foreign governments' economic espionage activities against
> the United States. The Economic Espionage Act: Turning Fear into Compliance ...
> cyber.lp.findlaw.com/criminal/econ_esp.html - 28k - Cached - Similar pages
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian at hursley.ibm.com>
> To: "Kwok-Ho Chan" <khchan at nortelnetworks.com>
> Cc: "Andrew Smith" <ah_smith at acm.org>; "Diff Serv" <diffserv at ietf.org>; "Bert Wijnen" <bwijnen at lucent.com>; "Randy Bush"
> <randy at psg.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 8:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [Diffserv] diffserv PIB: a question to the WG
>
>
> > I think the notes from Bert and Randy have explained why they
> > asked me to ask the question.
> >
> > BTW, Kwok, your mail agent seems to think it is still September 13.
> >
> >    Brian
> >
> > Kwok-Ho Chan wrote:
> > >
> > > DiffServ PIB just completed WG last call and sought only
> > > "proposed standard" now.
> > > When I asked this question in tonight's IESG Planary,
> > > Scott Bradner, Transport Area (DiffServ's Area) Director have confirmed
> > > many implementations and proven interoperability is not required at this point.
> > > -- Kwok --
> > >
> > > At 03:49 PM 12/12/01 +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > > >You'll have to ask the Ops & Mgt ADs that. As far as Draft Standard
> > > >is concerned, the actual requirement is proven interoperability. We
> > > >aren't there yet.
> > > >
> > > >   Brian
> > > >
> > > >Andrew Smith wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Brian,
> > > > >
> > > > > Seems odd that this formal request would come when it's only "proposed
> > > > > standard" that is being sought - have They changed the rules? It used to be
> > > > > that such implementation experience was only requested when "draft
> > > > standard"
> > > > > status was sought.
> > > > >
> > > > > Andrew Smith
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: diffserv-admin at ietf.org [mailto:diffserv-admin at ietf.org]On Behalf
> > > > > Of Brian E Carpenter
> > > > > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:55 AM
> > > > > To: Lloyd Wood
> > > > > Cc: Diff Serv
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Diffserv] diffserv PIB: a question to the WG
> > > > >
> > > > > Lloyd,
> > > > >
> > > > > No, it belongs here because it is a formal request from two Area Directors
> > > > > as part of the IESG's decision process.
> > > > >
> > > > >   Brian
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > diffserv mailing list
> > diffserv at ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
> > Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html
> >
> >
>