[ncdnhc-discuss] In Support of an NCSO

[Jefsey Morfin]

Dear Danny,
do you drop the SME Constituency project or are you just not willing to pay 
for the Membership?

I am interested at YK Park proposition to include the SMEs in her SO. This 
probably means that SMEs are more in the NCDNHC than BC?

Are you an NCDNHC Member yourself or just an ML Member?

You saw my mail exchange with Marilyn. I responded to her this morning 
politely but firm that her document had no meaning and unless she wanted to 
start a war she should remove it. This is not going to help my BoD election 
:-) but I cannot accept an absurd document against my business...

Jefsey


At 10:27 30/08/01, DannyYounger at cs.com wrote:
>Alejandro writes:  "Any restructuring as massive as the one you are proposing
>must be based on
>careful consideration of the results of the DNSO Review as well as the ALSC,
>the views of other DNSO constituencies, and complex issues such as one you
>mention..."
>
>I would like to comment on the "results" of the DNSO Review.
>
>At the point that the membership of the Review Working Group began arriving
>at conclusions that threatened the ongoing dominance of certain
>constituencies, the Review Working Group was instantly terminated by the
>leadership of the Council.
>
>The Council was subsequently given the opportunity by the Board, via
>resolutions 01.28 and 01.29, to put forth plans that outlined DNSO procedural
>and structural changes.  The Council declined to put forth any such plans
>within the timeline specified or thereafter.
>
>In the last six months, the Council's Review Task Force has generated no more
>than nine brief messages on their Task Force mailing list, and has not
>considered any restructuring options whatsoever.
>
>Their is no intent on the part of the Council to either "manage" a Review, or
>to reform.
>
>We have a dysfunctional unit (the DNSO) within our ICANN organization.  The
>management of that unit was afforded the opportunity to evaluate and correct
>its problems.  It elected not to do so.   In light of the ALSC proposal, it
>would be thoroughly appropriate along functional lines to decommission the
>DNSO and to reintegrate its constituent units into new structures.
>
>If you cannot treat a cancer, you must cut it out.
>
>The proposal that YJ has put forth is indicative of a proper step forward in
>the evolution of our organization.  It recognizes that there are
>institutional needs that are not sufficiently addressed only within the
>context of an ALSO, and that those needs cannot be served by continued
>participation in a dysfunctional DNSO that is not amenable to change.
>
>I support her efforts to achieve bottom-up self-organization as the needs of
>her constituents are not being met within the present structure.  While such
>restructuring may be perceived by some as "massive",  it is both warranted
>and in the best interests of the Corporation.
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss