[ncdnhc-discuss] Non-Commercial Supporting Organization

[Jefsey Morfin]

Bravo!

Dear YJ,
could it be thinkable that the NCSO goes by "Dedicated Interest Groups"
(you know how much the multiple meaning word "constituency" is a
problem for many with English, American, Napoleonic, and probably
many other cultural legal meanings) of different categories including
the IU (Internet Users) and the IDNH (indivicual Domain Holders)?

You saw that I got a support from Peter de Blanc to gave the ccTLD
a proposition to every Registrant. If I got your support we could simplify
this a lot: there could be :

- a Dedicated Interest Group in the NCSO for the Individual Domain
   Name Holders non-profit associations. The first one being the IDNO.
   But others could be accepted. There is a few and some are under
   consideration in Europe.

- a Dedicated Interest Group for Consumer Organizations. I am right
   taking advantage from my candidacy to the BoD to work on that
   subject. This would provide the NCSO a real international support,
   a lot of press coverage once it gets organized and a real opening
   on cultures and local demands.  It would probably also help on the
   financial aspects.

Thank you for your comments. The only thing is that we all are short
on personal resources and money and we have better to coordinate
not to waste our few possibilibties :-)
All the best.
Jefsey



PS. For you information, I think that a new working method should be
suggest to the Board. On every topic the comment of every SO should
be required - even if the responce is none. Every one is affected by
Protocols, by IP addressing, by DNS mangement, by Commercial
and Non Commercial issues. This would permit to have a ccSO and
a BCSO to develop while resticting the DNSO to its initial purpose
(before Dennis Jennings proposition).  It could lead to cross-SO WGs
and a normal work being developped.

Also, the ccTLD should be you allies in this endeavor as it would be
much easier to have one large revolution than two smallers.





On 14:38 17/08/01, YJ Park said:

>August. 17, 2001
>
>YJ Park
>
>
>                                     Resolution for
>Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Supporting Organization
>
>
>The current Non-Commercial Domain Names Holders Constituency
>of Domain Names Supporting Organization has been recognized by
>the ICANN Board in Santiago in August ICANN meeting, 2000.
>
>Since then, non-commercial domain names holders constituency
>has been encountering an endless challenge in the DNSO. It is always
>outnumbered in DNSO decision-making process by the majority votes.
>
>It turned out that it is almost impossible for Non-commercial domain
>name holders constituency to address its concerns which has been
>many times quite different from the other constituencies especially
>commercial-based constituencies easily to be buried due to innate
>DNSO imbalanced structure, five commercial constituencies,
>Registrar, ISP, IP, Business, gTLD, one non-commercial and ccTLD
>[note1], which has been pointed out by WG-Review report earlier this
>year and by At-Large Study Committee process, recently.
>
>On the other hand, there have been concerns expressed by NCDNHC
>members that there are too diverse interests mixed in this same
>group under the name of non-commercial domain names holders
>constituency, which is too vague to define its common ground and too
>broad to reach consensus many times within the constituency: There
>are education and research organizations, civil society groups,
>consumer groups, activist groups for citizens, non-commercial
>purpose lobbyist groups etc..
>
>Therefore, the non-commercial domain name holders constituency
>of the DNSO hereby declare its withdrawl from DNSO in Montevideo
>and its new formation of Non-Commercial Domain Names Holders
>Supporting Organization, NCSO.
>
>[Note1] ccTLD is difficult to categorize whether it is commercial or
>non-commercial in a simple way.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss