[Membership-affairs] {SPAM} Re: [NCUC-EC] point on the membership survey

[Walid AL-SAQAF]

Sure thing Bill. If you and the other folks on the list are happy with it
as it stands, I don't see any reason to delay much longer.

BTW, good work at the review meeting the other day;)

Sincerely,

Walid
On Mar 6, 2015 3:52 PM, "William Drake" <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> So now that we’re over the Singapore hump, should we be looking to get the
> finalized version of this survey off the ground?
>
> Bill
>
> On Feb 23, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Walid AL-SAQAF <wsaqaf at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>
> Thanks Amr,
>
> This is quite useful. I would rather keep all WGs even if you aren't sure
> are active. I'll just change the question than to working groups that are
> related to GNSO so as to remain factually correct. As for the name of the
> review committee. That's the way it appears on the official page here:
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/projects-list.pdf. But upon checking
> the link, it looks like the name you provide is the active one. So it makes
> sense to change it to that name.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Walid
>
> -----------------
>
> Walid Al-Saqaf, PhD
>
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
>
>>  Hi,
>>
>>  On Feb 23, 2015, at 9:44 AM, Walid AL-SAQAF <wsaqaf at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [SNIP]
>>
>>    *Just so we don't spend too much more time on this, could you do me a
>> favor and point out that the below active list is what we want to include
>> in the survey? Is there anything else missing, incorrect, or needs removal?*
>>
>>  *GNSO Working Groups:*
>>
>>
>>    1.
>> *Curative Rights Protections for IGO/INGOs (IGO-INGO-CRP) *
>>
>>     Active
>>
>>
>>    1.
>> *Discussion Group – New gTLD Subsequent Rounds (ngTLDs-DG) *
>>
>>     Active
>>
>>
>>    1.
>> *GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on Early Engagement (GAC-GNSO-CG) *
>>
>>     This is Active, and although its charter was adopted by the GNSO
>> council and the GAC, it isn't a GNSO WG per se. Just a consultation group
>> consisting of some GNSO councillors and GAC members. It isn’t open to
>> participation/membership.
>>
>>
>>    1.
>> *Geo Regions Review Community-wide WG *
>>
>>     Not sure if this is active, or not. I don’t believe it is. It
>> submitted a draft final report years ago, but I don’t know if this was
>> followed up, or not.
>>
>>
>>    1.
>> *GNSO Data & Metrics for Policy Making WG *
>>
>>     Active
>>
>>
>>    1.
>> *GNSO PDP Improvements Discussion Group (PDP-IMPR) *
>>
>>     I’m not aware of this being active. I might have missed it.
>>
>>
>>    1.
>> *GNSO Review Committee (REVIEW) *
>>
>>     Not sure what this is, but you may mean the GNSO Review Working
>> Party (
>>
>>
>>    1.
>> *GNSO Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation (SCI) *
>>
>>     Not a GNSO WG, but a standing committee chartered by the GNSO
>> Council.
>>
>>
>>    1.
>> *Policy & Implementation WG (POLIMP) *
>>
>>     Active
>>
>>
>>    1.
>> *RAA Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues WG (PPSAI) *
>>
>>     Active
>>
>>
>>    1. *Translation/Transliteration of Internationalized Registration
>>    Data WG (T&T)*
>>
>>     Active
>>
>>  I don’t know wether or not you want to point out that numbers 1, 10 and
>> 11 are GNSO PDP working groups, as opposed to 5 and 9 that are GNSO
>> (non-PDP) working groups.
>>
>>  Thanks.
>>
>>  Amr
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Membership-affairs mailing list
> Membership-affairs at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/membership-affairs
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/membership-affairs/attachments/20150306/c61aae5b/attachment-0002.html>