[Membership-affairs] Survey results

[Walid AL-SAQAF]

Hi Bill,

Yes. That's exactly what I had in mind. I just wanted to also get the
perspectives from you to add to the takeaways I think are noteworthy.

Alternatively, I can summarize those takeaways and introduce them here
first and invite comments before formulating the official summary that
would go public.

Best.

Walid
On Apr 17, 2015 1:59 PM, "William Drake" <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:

>  Hi Walid
>
>  So before we post the privacy protected version to the website, do you
> want to craft an short email notification highlighting the main take-aways
> and recommendations for possible action, to see if these generate some
> uptake?
>
>  Best
>
>  Bill
>
>
>  On Apr 17, 2015, at 1:26 PM, Walid AL-SAQAF <walid.al-saqaf at ims.su.se>
> wrote:
>
>  Thank you Seun for your important observation. I also noticed that the
> response rate was highest when individual emails were sent to members in a
> way similar to that used when sending voting ballots.
>
> I also thank those of you who provided comments off list. I encourage you
> to post them to the list as well.
>
> Best.
>
> Walid
> On Apr 15, 2015 9:59 PM, "Walid AL-SAQAF" <wsaqaf at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear MAT members,
>>
>> I have removed the public link I sent earlier and have instead put a
>> PDF file for offline viewing and also removed the answers to the first
>> and second questions (name and email) for privacy reasons.
>>
>> Find the PDF file here:
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6mAtpcLlTBBaFNDWE5EdEsyLWc/view
>>
>> Best.
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Walid
>>
>> -----------------
>>
>> Walid Al-Saqaf, PhD
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Walid AL-SAQAF <wsaqqaf at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Dear MAT members,
>> >
>> > A summary of the survey results is now accessible here:
>> >
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Qp5TCXCKfByrTzb9pLc9AymJYR-gCC8PvrAGBL18eas/viewanalytics#start=publishanalytics
>> >
>> > While the response rate is lower than what I had hoped for (around a
>> third
>> > of the total that voted in the 2015 EC election), I still see this as a
>> > welcome step to engage more members.
>> >
>> > We should now start going through the results to find takeaways. I would
>> > love to get some initial thoughts from you to discuss how we could make
>> the
>> > best out of those findings to improve member engagement. I can compile
>> your
>> > ideas and combine them to the results to write a short report that
>> would be
>> > formally presented to the NCUC community at ICANN53.
>> >
>> > Your ideas are welcome.
>> >
>> > W.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Membership-affairs mailing list
>> Membership-affairs at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/membership-affairs
>>
>  _______________________________________________
> Membership-affairs mailing list
> Membership-affairs at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/membership-affairs
>
>
>   *********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
>   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>   University of Zurich, Switzerland
> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
>   ICANN, www.ncuc.org
> william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
>   www.williamdrake.org
> *Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap *http://goo.gl/sRR01q
> *********************************************************
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/membership-affairs/attachments/20150417/e2935ae5/attachment-0002.html>