[NCUC E-team] SIGs

[Pranesh Prakash]

Dear all,
A few days back, Joly and I tested out the creation of new chatrooms.  Joly, without any special admin rights, was about to on-the-fly create a new chatroom, which could be set to be either temporary or persistent.  I see this functionality of XMPP being very useful in creating separate communication channels for working groups.

As soon as I have a little bit more breathing space, I'll get started with the installation of the web client.  That ought to make signing in easier for those who don't already use desktop clients like Pidgin/Adium/Jitsi, etc., to access Google Chat and Facebook Chat.

Regards,
Pranesh

Pranesh Prakash <pranesh at cis-india.org> [2014-01-17 05:18:06 -0500]:
> Joly MacFie <joly at punkcast.com> [2014-01-16 08:35:23 -0500]:
> > The biggest loss in my mind in the transition from the ning was the
> > deletion of the social networking function that allowed members to
> > create pages and create/join groups. 
> 
> XMPP allows any user to create ad-hoc chatrooms that others can join (in essence groups).
> 
> > You’ll note for example the
> > recent thread on ncuc-discuss about Interest Groups, in which several
> > African colleagues said they’d like to join an IG on IG4D.  We have no
> > means now to just create groups for people who want to work together
> > on issues, and no way for members to say “here’s me.”  I don’t know if
> > there’s anything that can be done about that, but would like to hear
> > from folks who are site enabled.  And if the answer is nothing, then
> > alternatives to consider…
> > 
> > Surely it would not to be hard to kick up a mailman list and a homepage on
> > the site. SIG admins could get "contributor" rights on the WordPress and
> > perhaps a category?
> 
> Mailing lists and indicating them on the website both require admin intervention but it is better for threaded asynchronous conversations.  I think this should also be done.
> 
> XMPP chatrooms (i.e., MUCs) don't require admin intervention and are better for unthreaded (synchronous and asynchronous) conversations.  Advertising SIGs internally is simple.  Advertising to the public can be automated by making the chat logs public.  And if we want, we could enable the public (non-NCUC members) join SIG chatrooms too.  But I'm not sure that is a good idea.
> 



-- 
Pranesh Prakash
Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society
T: +91 80 40926283 | W: http://cis-india.org
-------------------
Access to Knowledge Fellow, Information Society Project, Yale Law School
M: +1 520 314 7147 | W: http://yaleisp.org
PGP ID: 0x1D5C5F07 | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pranesh_prakash
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/e-team/attachments/20140120/c0a2bac7/attachment.sig>