[NCUC E-team] Mailing lists

Tue Jan 22 16:17:50 CET 2013

I figure it is not for us to figure out the names of NPOC lists.

i am not in favor of discuss at ncuc as i think that is partial duplication of ncsg-discuss.  i stil think we need the ncsg-discuss list as the primary general discussions list.

how about: members at ncuc for all the administrative and general discussions - the list for subsidiarity stuff

I would also like to talk about a policy at ncuc for any ncuc person, member or member of member, who wants to participate in crafting drafts of comments and responses.

i like the idea of announce list for every group who has separate announcements - send only lists except for coordinators etc.. 

avri

On 22 Jan 2013, at 09:46, Brenden Kuerbis wrote:

> I agree a multiplicity of lists would be unfortunate.  We should consolidate where we can.
> 
> What if we had:
> 
> discuss at ncsg (for members of NCSG)
> discuss at ncuc.org (for members of NCUC)
> discuss at npoc.org (for members of NPOC)
> etc.
> 
> and
> 
> announce at ncsg.icann.org 
> 
> to which officers of the stakeholder group and all constituencies can post election announcements, position statements, calls for support, etc.?  This would give the entire SG some visibility into the activity of the constituencies (a good thing) without overwhelming.
> 
> B
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Yeah we discussed it, but the discussion never settled on a decsion.
> 
> Plus last time, the discussion was for NCSG notices and discuss.
> 
> With the resurgence of  constituencism in the SG, i.e. the victory of the CSG old model, something I for one was hoping would not happen, we now face the world of  having -notice and -discuss for both NCUC and NCSG, which I would find unfortunate.
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> On 22 Jan 2013, at 02:17, Joly MacFie wrote:
> 
> > I think we might have discussed this before as I am having deja vu.
> >
> > But yes there should be one announce 'notices' list and one discuss 'talk' list
> >
> > The first should be mandatory for NCUC members, the second optional.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Tapani Tarvainen
> > <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 09:46:13PM -0500, Joly MacFie (joly at punkcast.com) wrote:
> >>
> >>> If it will be on lists.ncuc.org or preferably @ncuc.org as the domain,
> >>> do we need ncuc on the left of the @?
> >>
> >> Not really. The point in that, as well as using -discuss
> >> in the name, would be to suggest continuity with history
> >> (no big deal, I expect "discuss at ncuc.org" would be
> >> nicknamed "ncuc discuss" anyway at least in speech).
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> If we want it to be complementary to NCSG-Discuss, I recommend we
> >>>> not use - DISCUSS, as that makes it seem a replacement.
> >>
> >> Well, it will replace part of NCSG-DISCUSS, and at least Bill
> >> wanted to preserve the history by importing the archives of
> >> old NCUC-DISCUSS/NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS/NCSG-DISCUSS to it, too.
> >>
> >> Which part of NCSG-DISCUSS it will replace remains to be seen;
> >> it could be seen as complementary even with -discuss name,
> >> in the sense that it'd take over NCUC-specific discussions.
> >> If we want to limit it to only utilitarian stuff and keep
> >> all, even NCUC-specific, policy debates in NCSG-DISCUSS,
> >> then another name would be better.
> >>
> >> The name choice would no doubt have some effect on it, as a
> >> hint of what we think should go there, although I doubt it
> >> would matter much in the end, these things tend to live
> >> their own life.
> >>
> >>>> How about something utilitarian like NCUC-Work
> >>
> >> Why not.
> >>
> >> But it occurs to me it might be useful to create _two_
> >> new lists: besides -work/-discuss/whatever, also
> >> NCUC-ANNOUNCE or something like that, where (at least almost)
> >> all members would be subscribed but posting privileges limited
> >> to select few (like the EC) and volume kept very low -
> >> just announcements of elections &c, but no discussions
> >> (even Reply-To: could go to the work list).
> >>
> >> For I'm quite sure the volume of the work list, whatever
> >> the name, will drive some members away pretty soon, and
> >> it would be useful to be able to reach them anyway.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Tapani Tarvainen
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> E-team mailing list
> >> E-team at lists.ncuc.org
> >> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/e-team
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
> > WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
> > http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
> > VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > _______________________________________________
> > E-team mailing list
> > E-team at lists.ncuc.org
> > http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/e-team
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> E-team mailing list
> E-team at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/e-team
> 
> 