[NCUC E-team] Website revisions by Constituency Day?

[Brenden Kuerbis]

Tapani,

Could you runa query that provides an organizational membership table
or csv similar to what is on the current website?  I.e.,

Organizational Members of NCUC (Name, Official Representative)


Thanks!

Brenden


On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Tapani Tarvainen
<ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:

> Best data we have is on the new site, it could be imported to Ning
> or linked to from there (though then some prettyfication would be nice):
> http://ncuc1.ncuc.org/members/
>
> If you want more data on the members you can use the phppgadmin
> viewer account, or let me know what you want and I can create
> similar ugly reports (or csv files) easily enough.
>






>> Member Teams (what I'd call them, anyway)
>> http://ncuc.org/page/working-teams. This now under Participate
>> rather than Governance, which would make more sense to me, but
>> anyway:
>
>> *The first thing that jumps out at me is that in some cases the
>> lists of team members are shorter than the actual lists of team list
>> subscribers. There's no need to underplay the level of member
>> engagement...
>
>> *Second thing: while some teams have been slow to get going,
>> eventually each will have content, activities to report. So why not
>> create separate pages for each team, linked to this main page?
>> Each could have a one sentence descriptor for now at the top saying
>> what the team's about, the list of participants, the link to the
>> mailing list, and then any docs/records of activity.
>
> As a starting point, how about just a link to the mailing list?
> Participants can be found there as well (although only as email
> addresses rather than names, ugly).
>
>> *Since there's been no mail yet but we will try to start in the next
>> quarter, Tapani would it be possible to rename the team and list
>> Bylaws Revision rather than Charter?
>
> Renaming the charter mailing list you mean? Sure.
> For technical reasons there should be no space though, so
> it'd have to be either "bylaws" or "bylaws-revision" or similar.
> Would "bylaws" be OK? It'd be usable later for interpretation
> debates &c after revision is (at least temporarily) done.
>
>> I'm not sure how I screwed that up
>
> Maybe because "charter" is what used to be in the Ning site...
> (seems to have gone now, presumably thanks to Brenden).
>
>> *With the old Interest Group pages participants with personal member
>> pages would show up in the groups. Is that no longer possible?
>
> It should be possible once we get the new (Wordpress-based) site
> up to speed, but probably not before Beijing.
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
> _______________________________________________
> E-team mailing list
> E-team at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/e-team
>