<div><div dir="auto">Thanks Renata! So @louise @michael and @ines any feedback on your part?</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">E.</div><div dir="auto">—</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div>On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:52 PM Renata Aquino Ribeiro <<a href="mailto:raquino@gmail.com">raquino@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Whatever you decide to do, work on information on the call doc, work<br>
on another doc, decide soon and per majority please.<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
Best<br>
<br>
Renata<br>
<br>
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Elsa S <<a href="mailto:elsa.saade@gmail.com" target="_blank">elsa.saade@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hey Renata,<br>
><br>
> I think what Bruna meant is not about the call per se but what would come<br>
> before the call in terms of Operating Procedures that need to be in place<br>
> ahead of time.<br>
><br>
> E.<br>
> —<br>
><br>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 10:49 AM Renata Aquino Ribeiro <<a href="mailto:raquino@gmail.com" target="_blank">raquino@gmail.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hi Bruna<br>
>><br>
>> The draft of the call is here. The EC can add the term length or<br>
>> whichever other details it thinks is necessary<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rVg0hPQsS9fNfdnNvNCoiLVZm82inH-b9SUIL0KFTvY/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rVg0hPQsS9fNfdnNvNCoiLVZm82inH-b9SUIL0KFTvY/edit?usp=sharing</a><br>
>><br>
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Bruna Martins dos Santos<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:bruna.mrtns@gmail.com" target="_blank">bruna.mrtns@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> > I have a suggestion:<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Why dont we draft a composition, and some sort of Operating Procedures<br>
>> > and<br>
>> > share it with the list for comments? We could open our thoughts to them<br>
>> > and<br>
>> > explain that our new Bylaws state the creation of a PC but we still have<br>
>> > some doubts about its composition, date of creation (now or when the<br>
>> > next<br>
>> > leadership term begins) and etc, hence we are sharing it with the<br>
>> > constituency in an open consultation model as asking the Constituency to<br>
>> > help us create that.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > I am personally not sure whether or not we should start the PC now or<br>
>> > leave<br>
>> > it to the next leadership just so it will be well adjusted in the<br>
>> > leadership<br>
>> > terms.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Best,<br>
>> > B<br>
>> ><br>
>> > 2018-07-09 11:24 GMT-03:00 Renata Aquino Ribeiro <<a href="mailto:raquino@gmail.com" target="_blank">raquino@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Hi Rafik<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Thanks for your advice.<br>
>> >> With both yours and Farzaneh`s opposition to a PC NCUC, that leaves<br>
>> >> the EC in a difficult place.<br>
>> >> NCUC has Operating Procedures with about 1 year old, the term of the<br>
>> >> new appointees doesn`t need to be up until the election (like NCUC<br>
>> >> Nomcom rep isn`t).<br>
>> >> If there would be a need for procedures I`m sure just a clear set of<br>
>> >> guidelines would do.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> But, alas, we can`t have a PC NCUC to serve to NCSG with NCSG<br>
>> >> objection.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> That is also concerning since our sister constituency has its PC,<br>
>> >> including some who are our members too, who have tried initiaves with<br>
>> >> NCUC in policy but found other avenues at NPOC, such as their PC.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> I`m also surprised by the idea of giving up on doing things or stop<br>
>> >> moving giving elections is coming up.<br>
>> >> We should work on building, rather than stalling. If in the future<br>
>> >> there needs to be improvement or rebuilding it is not something that<br>
>> >> should justify a standstill.<br>
>> >> There has never been such a posture among NCUC leaders that I remember<br>
>> >> and it is quite uncanny to start this now.<br>
>> >> Even without trust on current or future leadership, the lack of action<br>
>> >> is the most disregard one can show towards the constituency<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> I was far from being the main co-drafter of these bylaws, previous<br>
>> >> leadership were. Yet I think they are crucial to follow and we are<br>
>> >> mandated by board to implement them. So we read them up and try to do<br>
>> >> what is in there. How we plan to do it is trusting you and Farzaneh to<br>
>> >> be supporters with NCUC, with advice on the way follow.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Well, we have a lot on our plate so PC NCUC is one of many tasks on<br>
>> >> our list. It is up to the EC whether we should move forward.<br>
>> >> As NCUC, I see no reason why we shouldn`t do these 2 appointments left<br>
>> >> for 1 year term.<br>
>> >> If we still need better guidelines for the PC-NCUC we can discuss with<br>
>> >> these new contributors involved.<br>
>> >> However, majority rules here.<br>
>> >> And would be best to decide on this with a better response than "we<br>
>> >> stopped for elections".<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Best,<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Renata<br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 10:20 PM, Rafik Dammak <<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com" target="_blank">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> wrote:<br>
>> >> > Hi,<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > I would start first to give some background and context as I<br>
>> >> > explained<br>
>> >> > partly in NCSG or NCUC list. The PC is not a new idea, it was in<br>
>> >> > previous<br>
>> >> > NCUC Bylaws even predating NCSG formation. What happened is when NCSG<br>
>> >> > was<br>
>> >> > formed and NCUC position was to move all policy to SG level, the<br>
>> >> > NCUC<br>
>> >> > PC<br>
>> >> > became dormant de facto and even previous NCUC bylaws inconsistent<br>
>> >> > with<br>
>> >> > NCSG<br>
>> >> > charter as not updated. When Farzaneh, myself and other members of EC<br>
>> >> > worked<br>
>> >> > on the last bylaws review, we updated the text, made it consistent it<br>
>> >> > with<br>
>> >> > the NCSG charter and also took into account some previous cases.<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > As I said, NCUC position since GNSO restructuring and moving to SG<br>
>> >> > model<br>
>> >> > was<br>
>> >> > to do policy at SG level. However, there were rare cases when NCUC<br>
>> >> > could<br>
>> >> > make a statement and NCUC EC was in a situation to endorse it while<br>
>> >> > it<br>
>> >> > is<br>
>> >> > not its remit. The new bylaws make the NCUC PC as a vehicle for that<br>
>> >> > and<br>
>> >> > can<br>
>> >> > be used when needed and relevant such supporting NCSG position to<br>
>> >> > give<br>
>> >> > more<br>
>> >> > weight.<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > With regard to implementing the new bylaws in general, I think it<br>
>> >> > would<br>
>> >> > be<br>
>> >> > more useful to think about an implementation plan first. For example,<br>
>> >> > it<br>
>> >> > was<br>
>> >> > unclear why EC decided to start with Vice-chair position and what was<br>
>> >> > the<br>
>> >> > rationale for such priority. With an implementation plan, such action<br>
>> >> > could<br>
>> >> > have been discussed and prioritized. I believe that instead of trying<br>
>> >> > to<br>
>> >> > implement here and there some elements of the new bylaws, it would<br>
>> >> > make<br>
>> >> > sense for the EC as a team effort to go through the bylaws, identify<br>
>> >> > what is<br>
>> >> > requested to be implemented either as a role, committee or elaborated<br>
>> >> > as<br>
>> >> > operating procedures. That would make a draft implementation plan<br>
>> >> > when<br>
>> >> > relevant tasks are identified and discussed with membership to<br>
>> >> > decided<br>
>> >> > about priority. All elements of bylaws must be implemented but they<br>
>> >> > should<br>
>> >> > be done following a plan and outline the tasks needed to be done.<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > so I advise doing that instead of focusing on NCUC PC only. I also<br>
>> >> > notice<br>
>> >> > that members raised concerns on the mailing list and I cannot talk<br>
>> >> > what<br>
>> >> > was<br>
>> >> > discussed during the session at Panama meeting as I couldn't attend<br>
>> >> > it<br>
>> >> > because of a clash with council session. With a full implementation<br>
>> >> > plan<br>
>> >> > and<br>
>> >> > explanation, I think a proper consultation can be done with<br>
>> >> > membership<br>
>> >> > and<br>
>> >> > that would help a lot for communication.<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > with regard to NCUC PC, I think before focusing on composition which<br>
>> >> > articulated enough in bylaws, it is important to work on related<br>
>> >> > operating<br>
>> >> > procedures and more the guidelines. Concerns were made about syncing<br>
>> >> > and<br>
>> >> > coordinating with NCSG PC and that cannot be just tweaked just around<br>
>> >> > representation. While in bylaws we thought that having councilors<br>
>> >> > presences<br>
>> >> > plus NCUC rep to NCSG would help, outlining clear guidelines and<br>
>> >> > rules<br>
>> >> > of<br>
>> >> > engagement for coordinating and working with NCSG PC are needed<br>
>> >> > before<br>
>> >> > setting the NCUC PC in order to avoid duplication, optimizing the<br>
>> >> > work<br>
>> >> > and<br>
>> >> > having consistent positions. There is some caveat here, NCSG and NCUC<br>
>> >> > elections are just a few weeks away and so composition would change<br>
>> >> > again.<br>
>> >> > better to use this precious time by EC to do the groundwork such<br>
>> >> > guidelines<br>
>> >> > instead of starting the NCUC PC and not giving it a real chance to<br>
>> >> > succeed.<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > Another point, the role of NCUC PC is indicated by the bylaws, I<br>
>> >> > would<br>
>> >> > advise against using it for any other purpose. If for example, you<br>
>> >> > are<br>
>> >> > thinking about capacity building, you shouldn't use such a vehicle<br>
>> >> > but<br>
>> >> > create another ad-hoc one fit for the purpose. I recall some<br>
>> >> > self-organized<br>
>> >> > efforts like having drafters group of newcomers and so on. better to<br>
>> >> > nurture<br>
>> >> > those efforts having all kind of flexibility than trying to use a<br>
>> >> > bylaws-mandated structure for a specific purpose.<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > Also please stick with the bylaws, for example, I saw in the draft<br>
>> >> > call,<br>
>> >> > that NCUC rep to NCSG PC are co-chairs. Bylaws say Chair and<br>
>> >> > vice-chair,<br>
>> >> > so<br>
>> >> > you get to follow that and not creating new positions while I may<br>
>> >> > understand<br>
>> >> > the rationale. having NCSG and PC chair as observers when NCUC<br>
>> >> > members,<br>
>> >> > is a<br>
>> >> > fine proposal.<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > hope that helps.<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > Best,<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > Rafik<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > Le jeu. 5 juil. 2018 à 22:02, Renata Aquino Ribeiro<br>
>> >> > <<a href="mailto:raquino@gmail.com" target="_blank">raquino@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> > a<br>
>> >> > écrit :<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> Hi<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> Answers inline<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:44 AM, farzaneh badii<br>
>> >> >> <<a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@gmail.com" target="_blank">farzaneh.badii@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 10:00 AM Renata Aquino Ribeiro<br>
>> >> >> > <<a href="mailto:raquino@gmail.com" target="_blank">raquino@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> > wrote:<br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> Hi Farzaneh<br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> Thanks for these answers<br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> So by "priviledge of birth" GNSO Council are already members<br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> > Previeledge of birth???? Members elect them to the council. What<br>
>> >> >> > birth.<br>
>> >> >> > By<br>
>> >> >> > being elected to the council they will be on ncuc policy<br>
>> >> >> > committee.<br>
>> >> >> > kindly<br>
>> >> >> > choose your words carefully Renata especially as the chair it's<br>
>> >> >> > important.<br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> [RAR] I would also kindly ask you to reminder not to use your primal<br>
>> >> >> response here, which you would have learned it is a primary anger<br>
>> >> >> instinct should you have attended NCSG course.<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> Of course I`m not talking about birth as in ICANN baby GNSO<br>
>> >> >> Councillors, you misinterpret me.<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> I`m saying, just like you did, when they are "born" into office,<br>
>> >> >> inaugurated, anointed - whichever word for this ritual you may want<br>
>> >> >> to<br>
>> >> >> use - they become too PC NCUC - automatically, you said.<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> As well as PC NCSG are already chair and vice-chair<br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> > Don't understand<br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> these also have the automated ritual in place<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> So the call we'll issue will serve to identify the 2 remaining<br>
>> >> >> >> slots<br>
>> >> >> >> and observers<br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> > Yes.<br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> So that is what I was confirming<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> As for the purpose of the PC NCUC being disagreeing w/ PC NCSG<br>
>> >> >> >> that<br>
>> >> >> >> also seems impossible to me as they are "automatically" linked<br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> > Well you don't know the rationale behind this. Not always all or<br>
>> >> >> > most<br>
>> >> >> > councilors belong to one constituency. Policy committee is really<br>
>> >> >> > a<br>
>> >> >> > measure<br>
>> >> >> > to trigger under special circumstances.<br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> unlikely to happen anytime soon<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> We'll likely have the GNSO Council members as "dorment" in the PC<br>
>> >> >> >> NCUC<br>
>> >> >> >> as they are already spread thin on the PC NCSG<br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> > As I said Policy committee is only needed at constituency level<br>
>> >> >> > under<br>
>> >> >> > special circumstances. You will probably have a dormant NCUC PC<br>
>> >> >> > even.<br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> Could be. That doesn`t mean we shouldn`t implement the bylaws as<br>
>> >> >> they<br>
>> >> >> were approved by the board. It will be up for next NCUC leadership<br>
>> >> >> next steps with this PC.<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> However, the other purposes of the PC NCUC are legitimate and can<br>
>> >> >> >> help<br>
>> >> >> >> also create better communication and participation in policy.<br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> > I'd discuss with NCUC EC the need for pc at the moment.<br>
>> >> >> > Communication<br>
>> >> >> > doesn't have to be through a policy committee. As I did during my<br>
>> >> >> > term,<br>
>> >> >> > I<br>
>> >> >> > periodically informed members. Also you need to be careful in not<br>
>> >> >> > communicating duplicates of NCSG mailing list people don't want to<br>
>> >> >> > receive<br>
>> >> >> > two identical email. If you want to help find volunteers etc for<br>
>> >> >> > writing<br>
>> >> >> > public comments then I think that's good but I do not encourage<br>
>> >> >> > duplicates.<br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> We have discussed the PC NCUC during NCUC Members session and we<br>
>> >> >> will<br>
>> >> >> be careful not issuing duplicate messages as we have been.<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> I find the idea itself of not having it as limiting the<br>
>> >> >> implementation<br>
>> >> >> of bylaws and much more closer to incurring in liability than having<br>
>> >> >> it and collectively overseeing it, hopefully with your advice,<br>
>> >> >> Rafik`s<br>
>> >> >> and whoever wants to chime in.<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> I`d also believe NCSG Chairs and NCSG PC Chair should be part of<br>
>> >> >> >> the<br>
>> >> >> >> committee, although as advisors/observers - again, I'm aware that<br>
>> >> >> >> there are already too much tasks on those roles.<br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> I don't think you should allow ncsg chair and pc automatically<br>
>> >> >> >> become<br>
>> >> >> >> observers unless they are ncuc members.<br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> I think no addition of observer is automatic but if there isn`t a<br>
>> >> >> majority of opposition, it is EC decision.<br>
>> >> >> EC wants you and Rafik to stay involved and advise us. Sometimes EC<br>
>> >> >> may decide their own path but they will always listen.<br>
>> >> >> It is important to keep communication between NCUC EC and NCSG Chair<br>
>> >> >> (if you don`t want to talk to, let`s say, NCUC Chair).<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> Again, this is a new implementation of our bylaws so we`ll learn<br>
>> >> >> >> it<br>
>> >> >> >> as<br>
>> >> >> >> we go along.<br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> Thanks<br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> Renata<br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 12:21 AM, farzaneh badii<br>
>> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@gmail.com" target="_blank">farzaneh.badii@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >> >> >> > Hi<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> > In response to Renata, I first want to tell you why the idea<br>
>> >> >> >> > having a<br>
>> >> >> >> > policy<br>
>> >> >> >> > committee is in the bylaws in the first place. My opinion from<br>
>> >> >> >> > my<br>
>> >> >> >> > experience<br>
>> >> >> >> > is that constituency's PC react when 1. consensus not possible<br>
>> >> >> >> > at<br>
>> >> >> >> > the<br>
>> >> >> >> > SG<br>
>> >> >> >> > level 2. They want to re-emphasize the points of NCSG PC 3.<br>
>> >> >> >> > They<br>
>> >> >> >> > want<br>
>> >> >> >> > to<br>
>> >> >> >> > add<br>
>> >> >> >> > to their public comments or modify it.<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> > The Bylaws say NCUC "shall" have a policy committee. Shall does<br>
>> >> >> >> > not<br>
>> >> >> >> > mean<br>
>> >> >> >> > must, it means "may". So I interpret that if there is a need<br>
>> >> >> >> > for a<br>
>> >> >> >> > policy<br>
>> >> >> >> > committee at the NCUC level then NCUC will convene a policy<br>
>> >> >> >> > committee.<br>
>> >> >> >> > Seems<br>
>> >> >> >> > like you have established the need.<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> > Now we go to Renata's questions:<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> - The members of GNSO Council have seats on this safeguarded<br>
>> >> >> >> >> by<br>
>> >> >> >> >> the<br>
>> >> >> >> >> bylaws. Is it their obligation or do they need to confirm they<br>
>> >> >> >> >> want<br>
>> >> >> >> >> to<br>
>> >> >> >> >> be a part of this?<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> > GNSO councilors who are NCUC members are automatically assigned<br>
>> >> >> >> > a<br>
>> >> >> >> > seat<br>
>> >> >> >> > on<br>
>> >> >> >> > NCUC PC. They are not obligated to but it's their right to be<br>
>> >> >> >> > assigned a<br>
>> >> >> >> > seat. So no need for confirmation or acceptance. They already<br>
>> >> >> >> > have<br>
>> >> >> >> > SOIs<br>
>> >> >> >> > for<br>
>> >> >> >> > GNSO council.<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> - EC has to elect Chair and Vice-chair of the PC NCUC, I<br>
>> >> >> >> >> assume<br>
>> >> >> >> >> they<br>
>> >> >> >> >> can be out of the safeguarded seats too right?<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> > [Paragraph B explicitly says: The Chair and the Vice Chair of<br>
>> >> >> >> > the<br>
>> >> >> >> > Policy<br>
>> >> >> >> > Committee shall be appointed by the EC and the Chair shall also<br>
>> >> >> >> > serve<br>
>> >> >> >> > on<br>
>> >> >> >> > the<br>
>> >> >> >> > NCSG Policy Committee. ]<br>
>> >> >> >> > This means that the chair of the policy committee should be<br>
>> >> >> >> > serving<br>
>> >> >> >> > on<br>
>> >> >> >> > NCSG<br>
>> >> >> >> > PC. So only Farrel or Claudio can be chair. This design is on<br>
>> >> >> >> > purpose.<br>
>> >> >> >> > The<br>
>> >> >> >> > chair of NCUC policy committee has to know what is going in<br>
>> >> >> >> > NCSG<br>
>> >> >> >> > Policy<br>
>> >> >> >> > Committee and see if there are actions required to be taken at<br>
>> >> >> >> > NCUC<br>
>> >> >> >> > level.<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> - Chairs of PC NCSG and NCSG are not referred in the bylaws as<br>
>> >> >> >> >> part<br>
>> >> >> >> >> of<br>
>> >> >> >> >> PC NCUC however I`d take it they have to be included and<br>
>> >> >> >> >> consulted<br>
>> >> >> >> >> on<br>
>> >> >> >> >> approval of the call as GNSO Council members are under their<br>
>> >> >> >> >> purview?<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Well, let me know if I missed anything<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> > These two positions are not mentioned because there might come<br>
>> >> >> >> > a<br>
>> >> >> >> > time<br>
>> >> >> >> > that<br>
>> >> >> >> > these two positions are not filled by NCUC members. Then you<br>
>> >> >> >> > don't<br>
>> >> >> >> > want<br>
>> >> >> >> > to<br>
>> >> >> >> > have non-NCUC members on your PC. But the Bylaws also say that<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> > G) "Other individuals shall be invited to participate in the<br>
>> >> >> >> > deliberations<br>
>> >> >> >> > of the NCUC Policy Committee, including: 1. Members (or their<br>
>> >> >> >> > Official<br>
>> >> >> >> > Representatives) who are serving on GNSO Working Groups, ICANN<br>
>> >> >> >> > Advisory<br>
>> >> >> >> > Committees, presidential committees, and other policy bodies<br>
>> >> >> >> > (standing<br>
>> >> >> >> > or ad<br>
>> >> >> >> > hoc) within ICANN; and<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> > So in effect, you shall (which means may, not must) invite them<br>
>> >> >> >> > if<br>
>> >> >> >> > you<br>
>> >> >> >> > want.<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> > Farzaneh<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 4:44 PM <<a href="mailto:ncuc-ec-request@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">ncuc-ec-request@lists.ncuc.org</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> > wrote:<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Send NCUC-EC mailing list submissions to<br>
>> >> >> >> >> <a href="mailto:ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> <a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
>> >> >> >> >> <a href="mailto:ncuc-ec-request@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">ncuc-ec-request@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
>> >> >> >> >> <a href="mailto:ncuc-ec-owner@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">ncuc-ec-owner@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more<br>
>> >> >> >> >> specific<br>
>> >> >> >> >> than "Re: Contents of NCUC-EC digest..."<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Today's Topics:<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> 1. Call for appointments for PC NCUC - please review by 10<br>
>> >> >> >> >> July<br>
>> >> >> >> >> (Renata Aquino Ribeiro)<br>
>> >> >> >> >> 2. NCUC Members call week of 16 July - Agenda and doodle<br>
>> >> >> >> >> poll<br>
>> >> >> >> >> request (Renata Aquino Ribeiro)<br>
>> >> >> >> >> 3. Re: NCUC Members call week of 16 July - Agenda and<br>
>> >> >> >> >> doodle<br>
>> >> >> >> >> poll request (Elsa S)<br>
>> >> >> >> >> 4. Re: Call for appointments for PC NCUC - please review by<br>
>> >> >> >> >> 10<br>
>> >> >> >> >> July (Elsa S)<br>
>> >> >> >> >> 5. Re: debriefing notes (Mike)<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Message: 1<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 15:22:31 -0300<br>
>> >> >> >> >> From: Renata Aquino Ribeiro <<a href="mailto:raquino@gmail.com" target="_blank">raquino@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> To: "Exec. Comm" <<a href="mailto:ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org</a>>, Maryam Bakoshi<br>
>> >> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:maryam.bakoshi@icann.org" target="_blank">maryam.bakoshi@icann.org</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Subject: [NCUC-EC] Call for appointments for PC NCUC - please<br>
>> >> >> >> >> review<br>
>> >> >> >> >> by 10 July<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Message-ID:<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:CAMokdMw-QxtfNDSxikwp8NPaA3sq7T1K7V2ZWoWpiSFRJj4Ycg@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank">CAMokdMw-QxtfNDSxikwp8NPaA3sq7T1K7V2ZWoWpiSFRJj4Ycg@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Hi all<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> This is the draft of the call for PC NCUC<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rVg0hPQsS9fNfdnNvNCoiLVZm82inH-b9SUIL0KFTvY/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rVg0hPQsS9fNfdnNvNCoiLVZm82inH-b9SUIL0KFTvY/edit?usp=sharing</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Maryam, can you please check it too<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> A few doubts:<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> - The members of GNSO Council have seats on this safeguarded<br>
>> >> >> >> >> by<br>
>> >> >> >> >> the<br>
>> >> >> >> >> bylaws. Is it their obligation or do they need to confirm they<br>
>> >> >> >> >> want<br>
>> >> >> >> >> to<br>
>> >> >> >> >> be a part of this?<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> - EC has to elect Chair and Vice-chair of the PC NCUC, I<br>
>> >> >> >> >> assume<br>
>> >> >> >> >> they<br>
>> >> >> >> >> can be out of the safeguarded seats too right?<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> - Chairs of PC NCSG and NCSG are not referred in the bylaws as<br>
>> >> >> >> >> part<br>
>> >> >> >> >> of<br>
>> >> >> >> >> PC NCUC however I`d take it they have to be included and<br>
>> >> >> >> >> consulted<br>
>> >> >> >> >> on<br>
>> >> >> >> >> approval of the call as GNSO Council members are under their<br>
>> >> >> >> >> purview?<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Well, let me know if I missed anything<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Thanks<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Message: 2<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 15:47:44 -0300<br>
>> >> >> >> >> From: Renata Aquino Ribeiro <<a href="mailto:raquino@gmail.com" target="_blank">raquino@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> To: "Exec. Comm" <<a href="mailto:ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org</a>>, Maryam Bakoshi<br>
>> >> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:maryam.bakoshi@icann.org" target="_blank">maryam.bakoshi@icann.org</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Subject: [NCUC-EC] NCUC Members call week of 16 July - Agenda<br>
>> >> >> >> >> and<br>
>> >> >> >> >> doodle poll request<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Message-ID:<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> <CAMokdMxKvmbi6kDkF6TXybgO0UgL-30Kiyzevfaxt=<a href="mailto:2FJ_BoXA@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank">2FJ_BoXA@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Hi<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Let`s have a member`s call on the week of the 16th July to try<br>
>> >> >> >> >> and<br>
>> >> >> >> >> inform properly of upcoming news and latest developments<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Provisional agenda:<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rCw9naZvd0MstJSyBLtZgzYNveXlB7Roj-OEQAIMDa4/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rCw9naZvd0MstJSyBLtZgzYNveXlB7Roj-OEQAIMDa4/edit?usp=sharing</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Maryam can you please send a poll to NCUC-Discuss to find a<br>
>> >> >> >> >> time<br>
>> >> >> >> >> on<br>
>> >> >> >> >> the week of the 16th?<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Times should be Mon - Thu - 13UTC 17UTC or 20UTC<br>
>> >> >> >> >> We may do 2 similar if we have enough responses for different<br>
>> >> >> >> >> times<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Thanks<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Message: 3<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 16:27:01 -0400<br>
>> >> >> >> >> From: Elsa S <<a href="mailto:elsa.saade@gmail.com" target="_blank">elsa.saade@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> To: Renata Aquino Ribeiro <<a href="mailto:raquino@gmail.com" target="_blank">raquino@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Cc: "Exec. Comm" <<a href="mailto:ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org</a>>, Maryam Bakoshi<br>
>> >> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:maryam.bakoshi@icann.org" target="_blank">maryam.bakoshi@icann.org</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: [NCUC-EC] NCUC Members call week of 16 July -<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Agenda<br>
>> >> >> >> >> and<br>
>> >> >> >> >> doodle poll request<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Message-ID:<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:CAHFwYbeGYURU6QUao9vM7zt0heoHk3c_hYMThC1hxE0wvJYxDw@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank">CAHFwYbeGYURU6QUao9vM7zt0heoHk3c_hYMThC1hxE0wvJYxDw@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Thanks Renata, can’t seem to be able to open the google doc!<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Any<br>
>> >> >> >> >> chance<br>
>> >> >> >> >> the<br>
>> >> >> >> >> link might be broken?<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> E.<br>
>> >> >> >> >> —<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 2:48 PM Renata Aquino Ribeiro<br>
>> >> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:raquino@gmail.com" target="_blank">raquino@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> wrote:<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Hi<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Let`s have a member`s call on the week of the 16th July to<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > try<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > and<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > inform properly of upcoming news and latest developments<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Provisional agenda:<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rCw9naZvd0MstJSyBLtZgzYNveXlB7Roj-OEQAIMDa4/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rCw9naZvd0MstJSyBLtZgzYNveXlB7Roj-OEQAIMDa4/edit?usp=sharing</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Maryam can you please send a poll to NCUC-Discuss to find a<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > time<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > on<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > the week of the 16th?<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Times should be Mon - Thu - 13UTC 17UTC or 20UTC<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > We may do 2 similar if we have enough responses for<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > different<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > times<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Thanks<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > NCUC-EC mailing list<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > <a href="mailto:NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > <a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> --<br>
>> >> >> >> >> --<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Elsa Saade<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Consultant<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Gulf Centre for Human Rights<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade<br>
>> >> >> >> >> -------------- next part --------------<br>
>> >> >> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
>> >> >> >> >> URL:<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> <<a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180703/e5e60b6a/attachment-0001.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180703/e5e60b6a/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Message: 4<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 16:29:29 -0400<br>
>> >> >> >> >> From: Elsa S <<a href="mailto:elsa.saade@gmail.com" target="_blank">elsa.saade@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> To: Renata Aquino Ribeiro <<a href="mailto:raquino@gmail.com" target="_blank">raquino@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Cc: "Exec. Comm" <<a href="mailto:ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org</a>>, Maryam Bakoshi<br>
>> >> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:maryam.bakoshi@icann.org" target="_blank">maryam.bakoshi@icann.org</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: [NCUC-EC] Call for appointments for PC NCUC -<br>
>> >> >> >> >> please<br>
>> >> >> >> >> review by 10 July<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Message-ID:<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:CAHFwYbcKrW0gcxF8%2BkD9wK_5Vdj2WVdEOwKVsh__tJd0DX%2BwrA@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank">CAHFwYbcKrW0gcxF8+kD9wK_5Vdj2WVdEOwKVsh__tJd0DX+wrA@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Hey Renata,<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Very valid questions as we should be careful with the<br>
>> >> >> >> >> operating<br>
>> >> >> >> >> procedures<br>
>> >> >> >> >> we apply. I’ll be waiting for Maryam’s reply, and maybe some<br>
>> >> >> >> >> advice<br>
>> >> >> >> >> from<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Farzi and Rafik on this one.<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Best,<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Elsa<br>
>> >> >> >> >> —<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 2:23 PM Renata Aquino Ribeiro<br>
>> >> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:raquino@gmail.com" target="_blank">raquino@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> wrote:<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Hi all<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > This is the draft of the call for PC NCUC<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rVg0hPQsS9fNfdnNvNCoiLVZm82inH-b9SUIL0KFTvY/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rVg0hPQsS9fNfdnNvNCoiLVZm82inH-b9SUIL0KFTvY/edit?usp=sharing</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Maryam, can you please check it too<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > A few doubts:<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > - The members of GNSO Council have seats on this safeguarded<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > by<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > the<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > bylaws. Is it their obligation or do they need to confirm<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > they<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > want<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > to<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > be a part of this?<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > - EC has to elect Chair and Vice-chair of the PC NCUC, I<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > assume<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > they<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > can be out of the safeguarded seats too right?<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > - Chairs of PC NCSG and NCSG are not referred in the bylaws<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > as<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > part<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > of<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > PC NCUC however I`d take it they have to be included and<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > consulted<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > on<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > approval of the call as GNSO Council members are under their<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > purview?<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Well, let me know if I missed anything<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Thanks<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > NCUC-EC mailing list<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > <a href="mailto:NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > <a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> --<br>
>> >> >> >> >> --<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Elsa Saade<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Consultant<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Gulf Centre for Human Rights<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade<br>
>> >> >> >> >> -------------- next part --------------<br>
>> >> >> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
>> >> >> >> >> URL:<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> <<a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180703/e58f1d46/attachment-0001.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180703/e58f1d46/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Message: 5<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 18:21:29 +0900<br>
>> >> >> >> >> From: Mike <<a href="mailto:mkaranicolas@gmail.com" target="_blank">mkaranicolas@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> To: Renata Aquino Ribeiro <<a href="mailto:raquino@gmail.com" target="_blank">raquino@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Cc: Elsa S <<a href="mailto:elsa.saade@gmail.com" target="_blank">elsa.saade@gmail.com</a>>, "Exec. Comm"<br>
>> >> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: [NCUC-EC] debriefing notes<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:1200B345-004C-41EC-99C1-E79674132FD7@gmail.com" target="_blank">1200B345-004C-41EC-99C1-E79674132FD7@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Hi,<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> I plan on applying for ICANN63, just have to clear a couple if<br>
>> >> >> >> >> things<br>
>> >> >> >> >> this<br>
>> >> >> >> >> week first.<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Michael<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > On Jul 3, 2018, at 12:39 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > <<a href="mailto:raquino@gmail.com" target="_blank">raquino@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > wrote:<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Yes, per travel policy each funded traveler has to write a<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > report<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Since this time you were funded by NCSG that is w them<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > For ICANN63 slots we had no EC candidates<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Should EC wish to apply please get that in order<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Thanks<br>
>> >> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Em seg, 2 de jul de 2018 21:13, Elsa S<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > <<a href="mailto:elsa.saade@gmail.com" target="_blank">elsa.saade@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > escreveu:<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks Renata! I just added a small comment on the report<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> point<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> to<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> add<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> an action item! Would be happy to help write a report in<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> the<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> next<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> week or<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> two.<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Best,<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Elsa<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> —<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 1:05 PM Bruna Martins dos Santos<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> <<a href="mailto:bruna.mrtns@gmail.com" target="_blank">bruna.mrtns@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> Thank you, Renata! Should we push the idea of the series<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> of<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> post<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> from<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> EC members about this past meeting ? Each of us could<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> focus<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> on a<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> theme/track.<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> cheers,<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> B.<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> 2018-07-02 9:58 GMT-03:00 Renata Aquino Ribeiro<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> <<a href="mailto:raquino@gmail.com" target="_blank">raquino@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Hi<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Please find here our debriefing ICANN62 meeting notes<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hj4uIwKTjFuCnYMAL4db7jewVa8-njegLj43iexPUwg/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hj4uIwKTjFuCnYMAL4db7jewVa8-njegLj43iexPUwg/edit?usp=sharing</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Best,<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Renata<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> NCUC-EC mailing list<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> <a href="mailto:NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> <a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> --<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> Bruna Martins dos Santos<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> @boomartins<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> NCUC-EC mailing list<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> <a href="mailto:NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> <a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> --<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> --<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Elsa Saade<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Consultant<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Gulf Centre for Human Rights<br>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > NCUC-EC mailing list<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > <a href="mailto:NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >> > <a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >> -------------- next part --------------<br>
>> >> >> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
>> >> >> >> >> URL:<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> <<a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180703/3f5e7090/attachment.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180703/3f5e7090/attachment.html</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Subject: Digest Footer<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >> >> >> >> NCUC-EC mailing list<br>
>> >> >> >> >> <a href="mailto:NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >> <a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec</a><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> End of NCUC-EC Digest, Vol 66, Issue 5<br>
>> >> >> >> >> **************************************<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________<br>
>> >> >> >> > NCUC-EC mailing list<br>
>> >> >> >> > <a href="mailto:NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>> >> >> >> > <a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec</a><br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> > --<br>
>> >> >> > Farzaneh<br>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >> >> NCUC-EC mailing list<br>
>> >> >> <a href="mailto:NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>> >> >> <a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec</a><br>
>> >> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >> NCUC-EC mailing list<br>
>> >> <a href="mailto:NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>> >> <a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec</a><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > --<br>
>> > Bruna Martins dos Santos<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos<br>
>> > @boomartins<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> NCUC-EC mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>> <a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec</a><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> --<br>
><br>
> Elsa Saade<br>
> Consultant<br>
> Gulf Centre for Human Rights<br>
> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade<br>
</blockquote></div></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">--<br><br>Elsa Saade<br>Consultant</div></div><div>Gulf Centre for Human Rights</div><div>Twitter: @Elsa_Saade</div></div></div></div></div>