<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.hoenzb
{mso-style-name:hoenzb;}
span.m-1576098249214864366hoenzb
{mso-style-name:m_-1576098249214864366hoenzb;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">A few comments about issue 1:
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Yes, this was added because of a concern about ISOC. But it could apply to various organizations with “chapters” or “sub-entities.” This is not a big deal because
it doesn’t exclude any organization from membership, only from dual representation on EC.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Not all ISOC chapters are “national.” Some are local to cities; e.g., Washington DC ISOC or ISOC New York. These chapters are actually independent of global ISOC
in terms of how they would vote or who would represent them. We should welcome all of them as members. However, given the relatively conformity of views amongst them, it makes sense to continue to restrict the number of elected officers who are from sub-entities
of a larger umbrella organization. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Here is how I would re-word the section of the bylaws:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">No two EC members may be the employees of the same organization or be representatives to the NCUC of different chapters or sub-units of the same organization.</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Obviously, not all of our organizational members have chapters. I think you can answer the ICANN staff comment by coming up with a definition of a chapter or
subunit. It should be general and flexible enough to capture ISOC chapters and other relevant sub-units. ISOC is the easy case, these organizations call themselves “chapters” – they define themselves as part of ISOC. But APC is a difficult case – their membership
consists of highly independent organizations who affiliate with APC in different ways and do not even share the same name. A lot of organizations have other organizations as members. Is that kind of a membership a “sub-unit”? I would say yes, we want to welcome
all APC members as NCUC members, but not allow them to dominate the EC. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">On the quorum issue,</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F4E79;mso-style-textfill-fill-color:#1F4E79;mso-style-textfill-fill-alpha:100.0%">
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F4E79;mso-style-textfill-fill-color:#1F4E79;mso-style-textfill-fill-alpha:100.0%">IV(C)(9)
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">part of the bylaws dates back to the bad old days when no one but the chair did anything. It was literally intended to empower the chair to do things unilaterally when necessary.
If you think we’ve moved beyond that point, I would put the quorum at 3. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></a></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Issue 1: </span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Our current Bylaws read as</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">IV(D)(4)</span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">No two EC members may be the employees of the same organization or be representatives to the NCUC of different national chapters or of the same organization.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">This is the ICANN staff comment: This term “chapter” occurs several times within the charter; however, it should be explained so that its meaning and interpretation are clear. Do all NCUC organizations
have “chapters”?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">We discussed the historical rationale of using the word "national chapters" as Milton also explained a number of times before. We<span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">thought perhaps we keep national chapters but also add sub-entities for those organizations that do not have national chapters. Mike suggested a wording that would exclude those structures
that were accountable to the same organization's hierarchy. (I hope I got that right Michael, can't clearly remember and didn't get to copy what you wrote, will have it soon). </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">We didn't want to make this clause too broad and didn't want to make it too narrow. Any ideas? please share your wisdom! </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Issue 2:</span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">IV(G)(5)</span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Appoint NCUC representatives to the ICANN Nominating Committee by majority vote, with at least four members voting.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">ICANN Staff Comment: There are 8 EC members according to Section IV-B. Does 4 constitute a minimum quorum for ALL EC votes or only for these special appointments? If it is a general constraint,
then it should be stipulated earlier in this section and, then, it does not need to be repeated in 5, 6, and 7.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Our discussion was: there are not however 8 EC members, there are 6 EC members. Considering that we have 6 EC members, should we have a quorum of 4? That aside, If we go with the quorum of
4, I think it should be only applicable to especial appointments as laid out in 4,5,6, 7.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> Other than this, having a quorum of 4 for voting in every decision making makes decisions more difficult. It also contradicts with this clause "IV(C)(9): Whenever EC votes are required by
the charter but inaction by other members of the EC prevents tasks and duties required by the charter to be executed, the Chair is empowered to act to further the interests of the constituency. In the event of a tie vote on the EC, the Chair shall act as a
tiebreaker." </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">So I suggest either to reduce the quorum to 3 and only applicable to the specific paragraphs mentioned above. ( or we could leave 4 as is)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Thanks </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#888888"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#888888"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#888888"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#888888"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#888888"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#888888"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#888888">Farzaneh</span><span style="color:#888888"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#888888"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>