<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">Hi Farzaneh,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_extra">I.B.: Should we list broader, more general NCUC interests or should we</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">list specific issues? ( as it is, we have specific issues). Recommended a</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">change.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">[Rafik] as I added in the document, I don't think we should be restrictive. currently we don't have an exhaustive or restricted list but gives indication of topics that can interest or matter to members. new topics and issues can pop-up any time. before 2014, we didn't listt IANA stewardship transition as a topic.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">2. Matt and Accountability: Wants it under section I. And suggests we say</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">something to this effect: Perhaps add something here on what the NCUC</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">commits to do vis-a-vis the orgs and interests that it represents? I think</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">from an accountability perspective it would be useful to make explicit</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">how we communicate (website, newsletter), how we involve (open</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">meetings etc.), how we “report back on activities, and how we manage the</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">membership lists to ensure that it is up to date etc.]</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">[Rafik] while it is good to list some expectations in term of reporting and accountability, we shouldn't be detailling how that should be done. we should define what is the expected behavior or performance and leave a room on how it is implemented. EC can work on procedural or implementation, and review that regularly. I also dont think that section I is the right place for that,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">3. Ayden’s comment on social purpose companies has gained Matt’s</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">attention. Look at the comment. III(A)(2)</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">[Rafik] while they have a social purpose, they are still for-profit. we have to put some limits and restrictions on who join us. they can join the commercial side since they are running businesses. we have similar discussion before at NCSg level when cybercafes and telecentres tried to create constituencies, cybercafes are basically business even if they are set to serve and provide access to communities.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">4. Decide on whether keep “good standing” or not</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">[Rafik] I thought in the call we discussed to use "eligible" word instead.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">5. Calling for more details on how we remove people from people at NCUC.</div><div class="gmail_extra">[Rafik] maybe adding text that when situation change and member is not matching the eligibility criteria , he can be removed. NCSG charter itself leave the definition of removal procedure to be set by NCSG EC</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">"<strong style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:20px">.2.6. Procedural rules</strong></div><div class="gmail_extra"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:20px">The Executive Committee shall create procedural rules for membership and for existing members to maintain their good standing or for removal of membership for cause. Any such procedure will be subject to membership approval.</span>"</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">NCSG charter has this article too:</div><div class="gmail_extra">"<strong style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:20px">2.2.9 Loss of Membership</strong></div><p style="margin:10px 0px 0px;padding:0px;color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:20px">Any member who no longer meets the membership criteria established in this charter is obligated to notify the NCSG‑EC and resign membership.</p><div class="gmail_extra"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:20px">In the event that an NCSG member in good standing believes that membership is held inappropriately by another organization or individual, a request can be made to the NCSG‑EC to review whether the disputed member meets the criteria for membership. In performing review, the NCSG‑EC will review any evidence provided in the request and will solicit a response from the member whose membership is being questioned. Any decision by the NCSG‑EC on revoking membership may be appealed according to the procedures set out in Section 2.4.2.1</span>" </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">6. IX. B</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Charter amendments shall be passed if at least two thirds of the votes cast in</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">the election favor its adoption (provided 40% or more of the eligible Voters</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">cast a ballot in the election).Ron says: 40% of the eligible individual and</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">organizational members. not 40% of the elegible "votes" where organizations</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">get multiple votes</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">[Rafik] yes correct 40% in the voters list which include individuals and organizations.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Best,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Rafik </div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-10-16 10:30 GMT+09:00 farzaneh badii <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@gmail.com" target="_blank">farzaneh.badii@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi all, <div><br></div><div>I have gone through the bylaws and tried to resolve as many comments as possible. But please go through it and write down what you think for each point so that we can resolve.</div><div><br></div><div>I have carried out all the tasks you assigned me to. So over to you. <span class="gmail-HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail-m_-3432052245965443831gmail_signature">Farzaneh</div>
</font></span></div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
NCUC-EC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org">NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>