<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:΢ÈíÑźÚ
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'><div>Hi Rafik, Hi Ed,</div><div><br></div><div>First, thanks Ed for the hard work. <span style="font-size: 12pt;">It is such a consolidated draft comment.</span></div><div><br></div><div>The points are summarized as follows£º</div><div><br></div><div>NCUC does not accept:</div><div><br></div><div><b>Recommendation 1:</b> Establishing an Empowered Community for Enforcing Community Powers</div><div><div><b>Recommendation 9: </b>Incorporation of the Affirmation of Commitments</div><div><b>Recommendation 10:</b> Enhancing the accountability of Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees</div><div><b>Recommendation 11:</b> Board Obligations with Regards to Governmental Advisory Committee Advice (Stress Test 18)</div></div><div><br></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">NCUC accepts:</span></div><div><br></div><div><b>Recommendation 2:</b> Empower the Community Through </div><div>Consensus: Engage, Escalate, Enforce</div><div><b>Recommendation 3:</b> Redefining ICANN¡¯s Bylaws as </div><div>¡®Standard Bylaws¡¯ and ¡®Fundamental Bylaws¡¯</div><div><b>Recommendation 4: </b>Empowering Community </div><div>Involvement in ICANN Decision-making: Seven New </div><div>Community Powers</div><div><b>Recommendation 5:</b> Changing Aspects of ICANN¡¯s </div><div>Mission, Commitments and Core Values</div><div><b>Recommendation 6:</b> Reaffirming ICANN's Commitment to </div><div>Respect Internationally Recognized Human Rights as it </div><div>Carries Out It¡¯s Mission</div><div><b>Recommendation 7:</b> Strengthening ICANN's Independent Review Process</div><div><b>Recommendation 8:</b> Fortifying ICANN's Request for Reconsideration Process</div><div><b style="font-size: 12pt;">Recommendation 12:</b><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> Committing to Further Accountability Work in Work Stream 2</span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I strongly support the comment to Recommendation 1. </span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Currently, ACs are not the same as SOs. </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This point is related to the foundation of the CCWG report.</span></div><div><br></div><div>Looking forward to possible awareness and solution to adress this point.</div><div><br></div><div>I agree to submit this comment in the name of NCUC.</div><div><br></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Best</span></div><div>Peter</div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><br></div><div><hr id="stopSpelling">Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 08:35:45 +0100<br>From: farzaneh.badii@gmail.com<br>To: rafik.dammak@gmail.com<br>Subject: Re: [NCUC-EC] NCUC statement for CCWG report<br>CC: ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org<br><br><div dir="ltr">Hello Rafik,<div><br></div><div>I have been involved with drafting it and I endorse it. </div><div><br></div><div>Best </div><div><br></div><div>Farzaneh</div></div><div class="ecxgmail_extra"><br><div class="ecxgmail_quote">On 21 December 2015 at 05:12, Rafik Dammak <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com" target="_blank">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="ecxgmail_quote" style="border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div dir="ltr"><div class="ecxgmail_quote"><div class="ecxgmail_quote">Hi everyone,
</div><div class="ecxgmail_quote"><br></div><div class="ecxgmail_quote">Ed suggested and worked on drafting the attached comment on CCWG report for NCUC, summarising main points in the NCSG report. NCSG will submit its comment and NCUC statement would strengthen that.</div><div class="ecxgmail_quote">we have short timeframe to submit this (deadline is 21st Dec 23:59UTC), @Milton and @Farzaneh since you are involved in CCWG and the NCSG discussion, can you help for this?</div><div class="ecxgmail_quote"><br></div><div class="ecxgmail_quote">Best,</div><div class="ecxgmail_quote"><br></div><div class="ecxgmail_quote">Rafik</div>
</div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
NCUC-EC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org">NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="ecxgmail_signature">Farzaneh </div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________
NCUC-EC mailing list
NCUC-EC@lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec</div> </div></body>
</html>