<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Oct 24, 2015, at 6:39 PM, Rafik Dammak <<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com" class="">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div>Perhaps a definitional issue. This is not only the same process we’ve followed in the past years it’s the same message. If you want to consider responding to a prompt to verify email to be check in ok.<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><p dir="ltr" class="">>><br class="">
>> - the election schedule was not announced (for ncsg I announced the schedule and process 2 months before the nominations starting) and this schedule will start directly in monday.<br class="">
><br class="">
><br class="">
> It just was announced.</p><p dir="ltr" class="">Well announcement and schedule should have been discussed much more earlier.</p><div class=""><br class=""></div></div></blockquote>Same process as the last years, notice sent after the annual, prior messages mentioned that this would happen. They have two weeks for each stage in the process and it works fine. </div><div><br class=""></div><div>Bill<br class=""></div><br class=""></body></html>