<p dir="ltr">Yes</p>
<p dir="ltr">Rafik</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 8, 2014 5:49 PM, "Matthew Shears" <<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mshears@cdt.org</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Is the meeting going ahead?<br>
<br>
<div>On 12/8/2014 8:02 AM, William Drake
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
Joy would you be able to come to DC if we have an extra slot?
<div><br>
</div>
<div>BD</div>
<div><br>
<div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>On Dec 7, 2014, at 7:01 PM, joy <<a href="mailto:joy@apc.org" target="_blank">joy@apc.org</a>> wrote:</div>
<br>
<div>
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> Hi Bill<br>
Thanks for your note on this - just wondering what other
support or assitance you need for this now? Please just
let us know.<br>
<br>
Joy <br>
<div>On 26/11/2014 9:57 p.m.,
William Drake wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
Hi
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks folks for the good suggestion.
It’s not clear we'd need to do this with the CSG
since a) the 4 plenary slots look to be full, b)
their forward looking agenda would be different from
ours, and c) co-designing it this would turn into
another protracted negotiation with our hydra-headed
counterpart. My suggestion would be that we do this
amongst ourselves in one of the two time slots
reserved for NCSG. There are a number of other
items we may also want to pack into those slots,
e.g.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Procedural: dialogue on improving the
functioning of NCSG</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Substantive: discussions in various
places led me to believe that people would like to
talk about IANA and/or EWG and privacy. CSG is not
interested in either of these as plenary topics
(although if we do the open fourth session I propose
we could still raise some things to air views and
see what they’ll say). </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>(Privacy was part of why I reach out to
Rotenberg as a possibility for one of the three
additional slots, along with Kathy K and another
player TBD. If we drop it probably he skips,
whatever. Or we could maybe do an outreach thing
Wed where he’d fit. Matt is there someone from CDT
that might be interested in attending?)</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Fadi: We need the man the morning of day
2 after he visits CSG. I think it’s important that
we are well prepared to lay out our concerns and
seek concrete look me in the eye responses,
otherwise he’ll fill the void and give us a speech
like last time, when we learned that civil society
is a bunch of crazies locked in the basement
(seriously). So really, unless we do it online
prior, I’d suggest that the day 2 slot entail
Fadi-prep. Which would mean packing everything else
into the day one slot, and the constituency slots.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>In any event: the participants (NCSG
Councilors + 3 others from the PC, NCUC EC, NPOC EC)
should have a dialogue about how they want to use
those slots.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Bill<br>
<br>
<div>
***********************************************<br>
William J. Drake<br>
International Fellow & Lecturer<br>
Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ<br>
University of Zurich, Switzerland<br>
Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, <br>
ICANN, <a href="http://www.ncuc.org/" target="_blank">www.ncuc.org</a><br>
<a href="mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch" target="_blank">william.drake@uzh.ch</a> (direct), <a href="mailto:wjdrake@gmail.com" target="_blank">wjdrake@gmail.com</a>
(lists),<br>
<a href="http://www.williamdrake.org/" target="_blank">www.williamdrake.org</a><br>
*********************************************** </div>
<br>
<div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>On Nov 25, 2014, at 12:52 PM,
Matthew Shears <<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org" target="_blank">mshears@cdt.org</a>>
wrote:</div>
<br>
<div>
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Excellent idea - Rafik and I were just
discussing the same. Should we create some
shareable doc to start the process? Is
there some more formal way of doing it
within the PC?<br>
<br>
Matthew<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 11/25/2014
9:56 AM, joy wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
Hi Bill - thanks a lot for sharing this -
just wondering .... would it also be
useful to do some kind of forward looking
exercise to help planning? For example,
mapping those new or emerging issues
likely to impact on policy work in the
2015 as well as those spaces outside ICANN
where SGs are planning to engage in 2015.<br>
Joy<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 25/11/2014
10:02 p.m., William Drake wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
Hi
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Just to keep folks in the
loop on discussions about January.
Any thoughts on any of the below?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Bill<br>
<div><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>Begin forwarded
message:</div>
<br>
<div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,'Helvetica Neue',Helvetica,sans-serif"><b>Subject: </b></span><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,sans-serif"><b>Re: For
Review and Feedback -- Draft
NCPH Meeting Agenda</b><br>
</span></div>
<div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,'Helvetica Neue',Helvetica,sans-serif"><b>From: </b></span><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,sans-serif">William Drake <<a href="mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch" target="_blank">william.drake@uzh.ch</a>><br>
</span></div>
<div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,'Helvetica Neue',Helvetica,sans-serif"><b>Date: </b></span><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,sans-serif">November 25, 2014 at
9:55:39 AM GMT+1<br>
</span></div>
<div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,'Helvetica Neue',Helvetica,sans-serif"><b>Cc: </b></span><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,sans-serif">Robert Hoggarth <<a href="mailto:robert.hoggarth@icann.org" target="_blank">robert.hoggarth@icann.org</a>>,
Tony Holmes <<a href="mailto:tonyarholmes@btinternet.com" target="_blank">tonyarholmes@btinternet.com</a>>,
Elisa Cooper <<a href="mailto:Elisa.Cooper@markmonitor.com" target="_blank">Elisa.Cooper@markmonitor.com</a>>,
"<a href="mailto:rudi.vansnick@isoc.be" target="_blank">rudi.vansnick@isoc.be</a>"
<<a href="mailto:rudi.vansnick@isoc.be" target="_blank">rudi.vansnick@isoc.be</a>>,
Marilyn Cade <<a href="mailto:marilynscade@hotmail.com" target="_blank">marilynscade@hotmail.com</a>>,
"<a href="mailto:lori.schulman@ascd.org" target="_blank">lori.schulman@ascd.org</a>"
<<a href="mailto:lori.schulman@ascd.org" target="_blank">lori.schulman@ascd.org</a>>,
Kristina Rosette <<a href="mailto:krosette@cov.com" target="_blank">krosette@cov.com</a>>,
Rafik Dammak <<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com" target="_blank">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>>,
Jimson Olufuye <<a href="mailto:jolufuye@kontemporary.net" target="_blank">jolufuye@kontemporary.net</a>>,
Maryam Bakoshi <<a href="mailto:maryam.bakoshi@icann.org" target="_blank">maryam.bakoshi@icann.org</a>>,
Brenda Brewer <<a href="mailto:brenda.brewer@icann.org" target="_blank">brenda.brewer@icann.org</a>>,
Benedetta Rossi <<a href="mailto:benedetta.rossi@icann.org" target="_blank">benedetta.rossi@icann.org</a>>,
Stefania Milan <<a href="mailto:Stefania.Milan@EUI.eu" target="_blank">Stefania.Milan@EUI.eu</a>>,
William Drake <<a href="mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch" target="_blank">william.drake@uzh.ch</a>><br>
</span></div>
<div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,'Helvetica Neue',Helvetica,sans-serif"><b>To: </b></span><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,sans-serif">"Metalitz, Steven"
<<a href="mailto:met@msk.com" target="_blank">met@msk.com</a>><br>
</span></div>
<br>
<div>
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">Hi
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>On Nov 25,
2014, at 12:17 AM,
Metalitz, Steven <<a href="mailto:met@msk.com" target="_blank">met@msk.com</a>>
wrote:</div>
<br>
<div>
<div style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">I
second Bill’s
thanks to Rob
for this draft. <u></u><u></u></span></div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">I also
think Bill’s
suggestions re
possible topics
for the Monday
AM sessions make
sense. Would be
interested in
others’ views.</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
Yes, please<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u><u></u></span></div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Beyond
accountability,
one topic IPC
would like to
see addressed in
the “plenary”
(perhaps on
Tuesday
afternoon) would
be New gTLDs,
which should
include
preparation for
the AOC review
as well as the
other
initiatives
staff is
undertaking. <span> </span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u><u></u></span></div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">I don’t
think EWG is a
great topic for
this meeting.
GNSO review
certainly could
be contentious
but maybe good
to start having
that discussion
here, as I see
was discussed in
dialogue between
Bill and Tony
earlier today.
</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Ok, so if
I’m remembering the
conversation correctly,
the items suggested so
far by more than one SG
would be</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1.
Accountability </div>
<div>2. GNSO
review including SG/C
issues</div>
<div>3. In-house
coordination as needed
in light of past
differences on board,
GNSO VC, etc. (if we
exhaust this topic
quickly or hit a wall
the remaining time could
be spent on larger
intra-GNSO dynamics,
e.g. role of the Council
in relation to the GNSO
community,
contracted/noncontracted,
whatever)</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>And options
suggested by one SG
include</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>*IANA or EWG
(NCSG)</div>
<div>*New gTLDs
and AOC (CSG)</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u><u></u></span></div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">We need
to build in a
little
flexibility to
account for the
possibility
(likelihood?)
that the House
will want to
“revisit” on
Tuesday one or
more of the
topics first
broached on
Monday. For
example, we
might reach
agreement in
principle on
something and
ask a subgroup
to draft a
statement for
discussion the
next day. In
other words,
best to
frontload the
plenary topics a
bit so there is
some extra time
on Tuesday
afternoon. <span> </span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>3 morning
coffee thoughts:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>*As the SGs
have separate meetings
in slots E and H, we’ll
have chances to talk
about items of less
interest to the other
SG.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>*To leave
time for Steve’s
flexibility and
accommodate any
unfinished
conversational threads
or unaddressed items,
why not leave the fourth
slot unprogrammed, like
a big AOB? It’s only 90
minutes, and an open
discussion opportunity
would allow for
reflections on the
meeting and ensure
nobody goes away feeling
like they didn’t get to
raise something they
care about. Would be an
integrative way to end
the two days.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>*Per
previous I tend to think
it better to lead off
with items where there’s
broad agreement and ease
into topics that might
be more difficult after
people have been
together a bit, which
might suggest proceeding
1, 2, 3 above => 4
open/loose ends
discussion.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thoughts?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Other bits:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>*Additional
bodies: I believe we
have agreed 3 per SG.
Personally, I would not
designate them as
‘observers’, if we are
going to invite someone
they shouldn’t be
somehow marked as
different and should be
able to participate
fully like anyone else.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>*Lunch
speakers: Per previous
my suggestion would be
to let people chat on
the first day, and would
strongly encourage
people to sit
intermingled rather than
self-segregated into
NCSG and CSG tables. On
the second day, we could
do a) Larry; b) a less
familiar-to-all beltway
denizen, e.g. a
Congressional or think
tank poobah; or c) Fadi,
who will have just met
separately with the two
SGs and might helpfully
address us on an
integrative basis
thereafter. I guess one
also could argue it’d be
sort of bad form to not
invite him to address us
as group, no?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>*Markus: I
would suggest that he be
asked to participate in
Fadi’s Day 2 discussions
with the SGs so he can
get more familiar with
our respective concerns.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>*”Day 3”: I
asked yesterday if
others are planning on
doing any sort of
outreach meeting
Wednesday morning on a
SG or constituency
basis, if so I’d think
we should do the same
and would need to factor
that into our planning
soon as it could affect
travel schedules etc.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Bill</div>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
<div><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u><u></u></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> <u></u><u></u></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></div>
<div>
<div style="border-style:solid none none;border-top-color:rgb(181,196,223);border-top-width:1pt;padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<div><b><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif"><span> </span>William Drake [<a href="mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch</a>]<span> </span><br>
<b>Sent:</b><span> </span>Saturday, November 15, 2014 9:35
AM<br>
<b>To:</b><span> </span>Robert Hoggarth<br>
<b>Cc:</b><span> </span>Tony Holmes; Elisa Cooper;<span> </span><a href="mailto:rudi.vansnick@isoc.be" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">rudi.vansnick@isoc.be</a>;
Marilyn Cade;<span> </span><a href="mailto:lori.schulman@ascd.org" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">lori.schulman@ascd.org</a>;
Kristina
Rosette;
Metalitz,
Steven; Rafik
Dammak; Jimson
Olufuye;
Maryam
Bakoshi;
Brenda Brewer;
Benedetta
Rossi;
Stefania
Milan; William
Drake<br>
<b>Subject:</b><span> </span>Re: For Review and Feedback --
Draft NCPH
Meeting Agenda<u></u><u></u></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div><u></u> <u></u></div>
<div>Hello<u></u><u></u></div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">Thanks
Rob for moving us
along. Some
initial reactions:<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">The
overall schedule
maps well with
what we discussed.<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">Re:
the Day 1
morning NCPH
sessions, perhaps
one option would
be to lead with
one on broader
changes/conditions
in the ICANN
environment on
which
non-contracted
would have broadly
similar concerns,
e.g.
expansion/diversification
of contracted
parties and
possible GNSO
implications; and
then do the second
one on our
intra-house
dynamics and
cooperation, e.g.
conduct of
elections etc. In
other words, lead
off with shared
stuff to get
everyone
acclimated and
then ease into
items on which
we’ve struggled a
bit?<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">Re:
the Day 2
afternoon NCPH
sessions, it
sounded on the
call like we all
agreed on
Accountability as
a substantive
discussion topic.
If I understood
Steve correctly
CSG would be less
interested in
talking about IANA
stewardship in
this context. If
so, perhaps EWG?
Or would we want
to discuss the
GNSO Review and
structural issues
in more detail?<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">I
suppose the four
NCPH sessions
could be ordered a
number of ways. We
also could for ex
hold the
intra-house
discussion for one
of the Day 2
slots, after folks
have been spending
time together and
are warmed up etc…<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">Re:
lunches, on the
first day, maybe
we’d want more
casual
conversation
opportunities? A
speaker on the
second day might
be good, a beltway
luminary of some
sort? <u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">Steve
suggested
expanding the head
count a little so
a few local
community members
could join. As
discussed,
alternative
considerations
would be keeping
the group size
reasonably
conversational and
not being
asymmetric. Could
we compromise on
adding two heads
per house?<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">I
had a drink with
Markus the other
night and he
didn’t know about
the meeting, but
he checked his
schedule and is
available. I
agree it’d be good
to have him there
so folks who
aren’t could get
acquainted. <u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div><u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div>Also,
going forward,
two process
requests:<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div><u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div>*Please
include my NCUC
EC colleague
Stefania Milan
on the Cc, <a href="mailto:Stefania.Milan@EUI.eu" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">Stefania.Milan@EUI.eu</a>.
She is copied
here.<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div><u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div>*Please
send to me at
only one
address, <a href="mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">william.drake@uzh.ch</a>,
I don’t need
copies of every
message in both
my accounts.<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div><u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div>thanks
much<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div><u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div>Bill<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt"></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
PC-NCSG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:PC-NCSG@ipjustice.org">PC-NCSG@ipjustice.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg" target="_blank">http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg</a><br>
<br>...</blockquote></div>