[NCUC-EC] Report from NCUC issue forum

[Kathy Kleiman]

Tx Mili, thanks for your response and agreed that it takes a lot of work 
to make a forum happen.

Let me follow-up with two quick questions. Could you share the source of 
the funds (was this PIR money?) and how much you paid? Also who owns the 
report this group produced?  These seem like fair questions, but if 
there is a concern about transparency, please let me know.

Best regards, Kathy

On 11/2/2023 10:40 AM, Mili wrote:
> Hi Kathy
>   As mentioned in my earlier emails too, we hired a rapporteur (a 
> writing agency that has writers) to prepare this report for us.
>
> For everyone’s clarity, I did not write the report. I am merely 
> facilitating it as we divided the various tasks for the issue forum 
> and I took over the task of looking for a rapporteur and co ordinating 
> this.
>
> And yes everyone put in a lot of work to make the issue forum happen 
> and it’s great to see the collective result of all our efforts.
>
>
> --
> With gratitude
> Mili Semlani
> Journalist & Engagement Manager
> Founder @ Youth4IG <http://youth4ig.asia/>
> Instagram <https://www.instagram.com/theuntraveller/> | LinkedIn 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/milisemlani/>
>
> On Nov 2, 2023, at 19:56, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at dnrc.tech> wrote:
>
> 
>
> Hi Mili,
>
> A lot of people spent a lot of time preparing for this issues forum 
> (as well as the first).  Can I ask how much you got paid to write this 
> report (and how  long it took)?
>
> Best and thanks,
>
> Kathy
>
> On 11/2/2023 2:13 AM, Mili Semlani wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> As a part of the 20th anniversary celebration, we organised an issue 
>> forum at ICANN78. It was decided that we hire a rapporteur to prepare 
>> a brief report of the discussion.
>>
>> I have attached the first draft of the report they have sent me. 
>> Kindly take a look and let me know if it's okay (check for factual 
>> errors, if its readable well and detailed enough for us).
>>
>> Can we add a link to the comparison between At large and NCSG 
>> applicant support proposals (the printed version that you prepared 
>> and circulated at the session) to this report? If yes, please share 
>> the link or send the document as an attachment.
>>
>> Also let me know if there is any other feedback on the attached 
>> report, changes, amendments etc. We ideally should share and publish 
>> it for our members before the readout scheduled for Nov 6.
>>
>> --
>> With gratitude
>> *Mili Semlani*
>> Community specialist
>> Instagram <https://www.instagram.com/theuntraveller/>|LinkedIn 
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/milisemlani/>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 01:59, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at dnrc.tech> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Mili,
>>
>>     Good to see you and Hamburg, and nice to have a chance to talk.
>>     Still in catch-up mode here; I'll have things over to you 
>>     tomorrow (11/2).
>>
>>     Also, what is a soft copy for and who is the writer?  Not sure I
>>     understand the request...
>>
>>     Best, Kathy
>>
>>     On 11/1/2023 11:14 AM, Mili wrote:
>>>     Noted. @milton do you have any additional resources, links that
>>>     point to this?
>>>
>>>     @kathy maybe we can also attach the comparison between At large
>>>     and NCSG applicant support proposals (the printed version that
>>>     you prepared and circulated at the session). Can you also send
>>>     me a soft copy for the same so I can share it with the writer to
>>>     incorporate.
>>>
>>>     @all of no further comments, I will send this with the below
>>>     feedback for final drafting. Kindly let me know by EOD (Nov 1).
>>>
>>>     --
>>>     With gratitude
>>>     Mili Semlani
>>>     Journalist & Engagement Manager
>>>     Founder @ Youth4IG <http://youth4ig.asia/>
>>>     Instagram <https://www.instagram.com/theuntraveller/> | LinkedIn
>>>     <https://www.linkedin.com/in/milisemlani/>
>>>
>>>     On Nov 1, 2023, at 00:37, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>
>>>     <mailto:milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>     
>>>
>>>     Hello, Mili
>>>
>>>     I think the report on RVCs would be improved if we could attach
>>>     the framework Kathy and I developed for allowable RVCs. It could
>>>     also discuss some of the “stress test” studies we discussed.
>>>
>>>     *From:*NCUC-EC <ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org>
>>>     <mailto:ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> *On Behalf Of *Mili Semlani
>>>     *Sent:* Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:31 AM
>>>     *To:* Exec. Comm <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
>>>     <mailto:ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
>>>     *Subject:* [NCUC-EC] Report from NCUC issue forum
>>>
>>>     Hello all
>>>
>>>       As a part of the 20th anniversary celebration, we organised an
>>>     issue forum at ICANN78. It was decided that we hire a
>>>     rapporteur to prepare a brief report of the discussion.
>>>
>>>     I have attached the first draft of the report they have sent me.
>>>     Kindly take a look and let me know if it's okay (check for
>>>     factual errors, if its readable well and detailed enough for
>>>     us). If it's good to go and doesn't require any changes, we can
>>>     furnish their invoice and they will pass the rights for us to
>>>     publish this report.
>>>
>>>     --
>>>
>>>     With gratitude
>>>
>>>     *Mili Semlani*
>>>
>>>     Community specialist
>>>
>>>     Instagram <https://www.instagram.com/theuntraveller/> | LinkedIn
>>>     <https://www.linkedin.com/in/milisemlani/>
>>>
>>     -- 
>>     Kathy Kleiman
>>     President, Domain Name Rights Coalition
>>
> -- 
> Kathy Kleiman
> President, Domain Name Rights Coalition

-- 
Kathy Kleiman
President, Domain Name Rights Coalition
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20231102/2ef8e717/attachment-0001.htm>