<div><div dir="auto">Hey everyone,</div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">The deadline for submission of this comment is the 18th of this month and according to Rafik noone has volunteered to write an NCSG response yet. I’d be happy to help support the team of volunteers anyway possible, but cannot write the comment myself due to a big workload on the council side. However I would really encourage a small team of us to engage with this topic urgently.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Any volunteers willing to work together?</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Best,</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">E.</div><div dir="auto">—</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:39 PM Tomslin Samme-Nlar <<a href="mailto:mesumbeslin@gmail.com">mesumbeslin@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Thanks for references Elsa. I'll go dig out the archives.<br clear="all"><div><div><div><div dir="ltr" class="m_8614435709520596993gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>Very best regards</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div dir="ltr" class="m_8614435709520596993gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div>Tomslin<div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 11:27, Elsa S <<a href="mailto:elsa.saade@gmail.com" target="_blank">elsa.saade@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div dir="auto">It’s also good to note that these two instances were not the only ones, however I shared them here promptly, for the sake of providing a couple of examples. I’m sure others on the PC would be able to provide more details :)</div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Best,</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Elsa</div><div dir="auto">—</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 9:24 PM Elsa S <<a href="mailto:elsa.saade@gmail.com" target="_blank">elsa.saade@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div dir="auto">Hey Tomslin,</div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Thanks for the question! </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Actually in Kobe, (off the top of my head) we had a meeting with the board where Global Public Interest was discussed. I’m pretty sure if you look at the archives of that meeting which I think was recorded, you’d find several statements by NCSG reps on the issue in conversation with board members. I remember quite vividly that we mentioned, it’s best not to use the term loosely, if at all.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">We’ve also raised the issue of the use of “global public interest” most recently at the GNSO Council level. The board recently sent a letter to the coyncil about Phase 1 of the EPDP and referred to “Global Public Interest” in their reasoning for concern within the letter. NCSG pushed for expressing concern about the use of the term in the letter from the GNSO Council and our wording was incorporated into the GNSO Council’s reply. This should definitely be in the archives.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Apologies that i will not be able to provide links at the moment, however I thought the question needed to be answered promptly.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">E.</div><div dir="auto">—</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 8:25 PM Tomslin Samme-Nlar <<a href="mailto:mesumbeslin@gmail.com" target="_blank">mesumbeslin@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Thanks Milton for the nudge and thanks Rafik for the details.</div><div><br></div><div><a class="gmail_plusreply" id="m_8614435709520596993gmail-m_-2420301275788861807m_-6744117946013758614m_3423361865054833765plusReplyChip-0" href="mailto:elsa.saade@gmail.com" target="_blank">@Elsa S</a> , you said "<i>Even though NCSG in the past year as far as I’ve seen, has been pushing for not using the word from the start,</i>" do we (NCSG) have any formal statement on this recorded somewhere that I can take a look at?</div></div><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div>Tomslin<div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 10:05, Rafik Dammak <<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com" target="_blank">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>the details about public consultation below. I created a google doc so we can start the drafting for a NCSG Comment <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nZJ91SSW55Isl2iBAEASopfYnWcsgsBcXdB5hUUjNdI/edit" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nZJ91SSW55Isl2iBAEASopfYnWcsgsBcXdB5hUUjNdI/edit</a>. you can listen to webinar recordings here <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/prjxplrpublicint/GPI+Toolkit" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/display/prjxplrpublicint/GPI+Toolkit</a> .</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div><div>Rafik</div><div><br></div><div><div style="font-family:Roboto,RobotoDraft,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">From 18 September – 18 October 2019, a community consultation is taking place on the <span>global</span> <span>public</span> interest framework proposed by the ICANN Board. In reviewing the proposal, the ICANN Board is asking the ICANN community to consider the following questions for input to the ICANN Board:</span><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(64,63,66)"><u></u><u></u></span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:30pt;font-family:Roboto,RobotoDraft,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif"><u></u><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">1.<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman""> </span></span><u></u><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">What are your thoughts on the proposed framework approach? Do you have any suggestions for how it could be improved?<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:30pt;font-family:Roboto,RobotoDraft,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif"><u></u><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">2.<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman""> </span></span><u></u><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">What are your thoughts on the proposed approach for decisions in the ICANN ecosystem to be accompanied by a consideration of their impact on the <span>global</span> <span>public</span> interest (as well as an explanation regarding what is meant by the GPI in the specific case)?<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:30pt;font-family:Roboto,RobotoDraft,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif"><u></u><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">3.<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman""> </span></span><u></u><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">How do you see this working for the Supporting Organization (SO), Advisory Committee (AC), constituency, group, review team, or cross-community working group (CCWG) to which you are contributing?<u></u><u></u></span></p><div style="font-family:Roboto,RobotoDraft,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(64,63,66)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div><div style="font-family:Roboto,RobotoDraft,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">The <span>global</span> <span>public</span> interest is central to many of ICANN’s primary governance documents, and the ICANN Board hopes to play a role in facilitating a bottom-up, community-driven process to develop a framework as a toolkit for the ICANN community to consider the <span>global</span> <span>public</span> interest. These considerations would not change the process by which decisions are made but could instead serve as tools for the community to reinforce the commitment to the <span>public</span> interest and to demonstrate how specific recommendations, advice, and <span>public</span> comments are in the <span>global</span><span>public</span> interest. This includes the ICANN community guiding the ICANN Board about the <span>public</span> interest determination the latter must make in its decisions.</span><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(64,63,66)"><u></u><u></u></span></p></div><div style="font-family:Roboto,RobotoDraft,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(64,63,66)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div><div style="font-family:Roboto,RobotoDraft,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">To learn more about the framework, please read the </span><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(64,63,66)"><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__r20.rs6.net_tn.jsp-3Ff-3D0014631p6ECz1koeg6ajMSzZrFT7DO05069BKNDJvhNpKDU-2D38mdcxCqJ1EJzj5gscgfkGfGj-2DFGI3o7d-5FcGAxvEYcLuDt-2DuNbFw7pLtAPwsOOBVyljJ-5FnOUkAdXGEq-5Fpqhnx9MAz7aDEHi3hvOaYb3gqWjXDXghZrpf0Ca1iUZzXdnGBbim2ZY09p7WU0m-2DXOMIhpn2CTVR7lR4v-2DDeX-5F4RZFHV0Vx2gnIRwJwkZKqQoiglVM4l6PG-2Df7xB-5FIkXMVwTDMtu5FHvXFhlTLLJIN5Jg-3D-3D-26c-3Dz44JySTIvEGqNJPIjwWImwF59dG21I-2DoxnM1Mz6G5PmaucLg5GaW-5Fg-3D-3D-26ch-3DFcbT1z5bmkz6UEfk6eUJehq3ywPR-5FHTaxr7BzhY6q17TcrAkO831rw-3D-3D&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=Zrm2TmioSoHmD-RVsf08eb9s33A4I2k08_uP0LOo_zA&s=Y1oSQaaaH67cndtqhCcGryOkThAU0RpFNJVzZzD0mGc&e=" target="_blank"><span style="color:rgb(72,161,153)">discussion paper [r20.rs6.net]</span></a></span><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">. Community feedback is welcome by <b>Friday, 18 October 2019 via email at </b></span><b><u><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(72,161,153)"><a href="mailto:gpitoolkit@icann.org" target="_blank">gpitoolkit@icann.org</a></span></u></b><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">. After the community consultation, there will be a <span>public</span> session at ICANN66, followed by a <span>Public</span> Comment proceeding.</span></p></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le mar. 24 sept. 2019 à 08:53, Elsa S <<a href="mailto:elsa.saade@gmail.com" target="_blank">elsa.saade@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div dir="auto">Thanks for sharing Milton!</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">ICANN seems adamant about using the terms on a context to context basis given the new proposed path forward, also shared in two webinars this month.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Even though NCSG in the past year as far as I’ve seen, has been pushing for not using the word from the start, it seems we might have to actively work on mitigating the risk of its use in a more structurally biased way.</div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I’m keeping an eye out for any developments on the consultation phase (even though I would have preferred a formal public comment phase instead), but would also invite that we all have a discussion about the proposed way forward by ICANN, more meticulously and collectively.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Best,</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Elsa</div><div dir="auto">—</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 5:59 PM Mueller, Milton L <<a href="mailto:milton@gatech.edu" target="_blank">milton@gatech.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I was reading some scholarly literature about public service broadcasting and came across this statement from a GigaNet colleague, Yik Chin:
<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">“The Constitution of the PRC indeed speaks the language of the Public Interest (PI), and the term regularly appears in legal provisions without definition. There have been no juridical interpretations of ‘PI’, either. This ambiguity gives
discretionary power to the authorities to interpret ‘PI’ in ways that invade and deprive individuals of their rights. Chin, Y.C 2012.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Food for thought<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dr. Milton L Mueller<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">School of Public Policy <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Georgia Institute of Technology<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">--<br><br>Elsa Saade<br>Consultant</div></div><div>Gulf Centre for Human Rights</div><div>Twitter: @Elsa_Saade</div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">--<br><br>Elsa Saade<br>Consultant</div></div><div>Gulf Centre for Human Rights</div><div>Twitter: @Elsa_Saade</div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">--<br><br>Elsa Saade<br>Consultant</div></div><div>Gulf Centre for Human Rights</div><div>Twitter: @Elsa_Saade</div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">--<br><br>Elsa Saade<br>Consultant</div></div><div>Gulf Centre for Human Rights</div><div>Twitter: @Elsa_Saade</div></div></div></div></div>