<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small">Yes, Stephanie, you captured my point with regards to the dual leadership roles that is allowed in the bylaws. Which we hope by default will encourage more participation.  </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 2:31 AM Stephanie Perrin <<a href="mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca">stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Yes any bylaw change
          discussion would be really to address the anomaly of twin
          leadership roles, in both constituencies.  I think that is
          perhaps what Nadira meant, that the goal should be to ensure a
          person did not hold down two roles, allowing more people to
          participate.<br>
        </font></font></p>
    <p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Stephanie Perrin</font></font><br>
    </p>
    <div class="m_5238362361675051037moz-cite-prefix">On 2018-10-10 19:27, Rafik Dammak
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div dir="ltr" class="m_5238362361675051037gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div>Hi,</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>I don't think there is a specific problem here to get
                new members to get into leadership. If you check the
                candidates for the election, you can find most of them
                joined NCUC in the last 3 years or more recently. It is
                not a bylaws problem as it already set a term limit, for
                example, enabling the regular renewal of leadership (if
                you check the leadership for the last years, you can see
                a lot of changes and new faces). In the end, it is about
                encouraging more people to get involved, participate
                actively and be ready to run for positions by
                preparation and getting experience and that is not a
                bylaw or procedural issue. </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        Best,
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Rafik</div>
        <div><br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div dir="ltr">Le jeu. 11 oct. 2018 à 06:39, Nadira Alaraj
              <<a href="mailto:nadira.araj@gmail.com" target="_blank">nadira.araj@gmail.com</a>> a
              écrit :<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div dir="auto">
                <div>This email thread raises an important issue that I
                  find contradicting to what the </div>
                <div dir="auto"><span style="font-family:sans-serif">NCUC/NCSG/NPOC</span> communities
                  preaches. The tremendous efforts in capacity building
                  programs and outreach to bringing new members to
                  contribute to the policy work and leadership roles at
                  the same time the stated bylaws doesn't help on this
                  regards.</div>
                <div dir="auto"><br>
                </div>
                <div dir="auto">Thanks Tapani for pointing that the
                  bylaws does allows that. I think it might be that
                  these bylaws were put at the time when there were few
                  volunteers. But now the community is growing, hence
                  there is need to revisit these bylaws to encourage new
                  members to get into the leadership roles as an
                  incentive to their actual contributions to the
                  community work whether it is in policy or on
                  managerial work.  <br>
                  <br>
                  I suggest to add this suggestion on the agenda for
                  discussion at ICANN 63 meeting.</div>
                <div dir="auto"><br>
                </div>
                <div dir="auto">Best wishes </div>
                <div dir="auto">Nadira </div>
                <div dir="auto"><br>
                  <div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto">
                    <div dir="ltr">On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 22:31 Tapani
                      Tarvainen <<a href="mailto:ncuc@tapani.tarvainen.info" target="_blank">ncuc@tapani.tarvainen.info</a>>
                      wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">This
                      discussion has become a bit weird. After all:<br>
                      <br>
                      * There's nothing in any bylaws or charters
                      against being in NCUC EC<br>
                      and NPOC EC at the same time.<br>
                      <br>
                      * There's no inherent conflict of interest between
                      NCUC and NPOC, and<br>
                      should there be such in some individual case,
                      David presumably will<br>
                      recuse himself.<br>
                      <br>
                      * David make his plan perfectly clear before the
                      election, voters knew<br>
                      it and voted him in.<br>
                      <br>
                      Admittedly this is a completely new situation, and
                      it is an open<br>
                      question how well it will work, but NCUC members
                      have chosen to let<br>
                      David try it. If it does cause problems, by all
                      means let's fix them,<br>
                      but I find it odd people are saying we should try
                      to prevent this<br>
                      situation from reoccurring before we've seen how
                      it works out now.<br>
                      <br>
                      As for travel slots, I would find it inappropriate
                      if David were to<br>
                      declare he'll only accept them from one
                      constituency. Whatever he<br>
                      does, he should treat NCUC and NPOC as equally as
                      possible. Of course<br>
                      this situation calls for more cooperation and
                      coordination between<br>
                      NCUC and NPOC ECs than before, but I don't think
                      that's a bad<br>
                      thing.<br>
                      <br>
                      -- <br>
                      Tapani Tarvainen<br>
                      _______________________________________________<br>
                      Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br>
                      <a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
                      <a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
              _______________________________________________<br>
              Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br>
              <a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
              <a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="m_5238362361675051037mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="m_5238362361675051037moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
<a class="m_5238362361675051037moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
<a class="m_5238362361675051037moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </div>

_______________________________________________<br>
Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><br></p>
<p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Calibri"></font> </p></div></div></div></div></div>