<html><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"><META name="Author" content="GroupWise WebAccess"><style type="text/css">
body p
{
margin: 0px;
}
</style></head><body style='font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; '><p>What about an improvement of NCSG-ALAC relationship?</p><p> </p><p>Wolfgang</p><p> </p><p> </p><div><div class="GroupWiseMessageBody" id="GroupWiseSection_1538431206000_wolfgang.kleinwaechter@medienkomm.uni-halle.de_03848B1F14C900009867776461663435_"><br><span> </span><span class="GroupwiseReplyHeader"><br><br>>>> Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc@tapani.tarvainen.info> 01.10.18 20.45 Uhr >>><br></span>Hi Elsa,<br><br>On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:32:55PM -0400, Elsa S (elsa.saade@gmail.com) wrote:<br><br>> I must say that I am appalled by the repeated mentioning of ‘the<br>> need for repairing relationships between NCUC and NPOC’ while in the<br>> past year, being in the NCUC EC, I only saw very constructive and<br>> encouraging exchanges as well as engagement between both<br>> constituencies.<br>[...]<br>> if all that i witnessed in the past year was only an illusion of a<br>> healthy development [...]<br><br>No, I think it's been very real, indeed NCUC-NPOC relations have been<br>steadily improving over the past three or four years. But I remember<br>only too well when they were much worse, and I'm worried that things<br>could go to the wrong direction again. And a liaison, whether such<br>overlapping EC membership as Dave is now attempting or not, could<br>help, acting like the hotline during Cold War to alert early and help<br>resolve potential problems before they become too difficult.<br><br>Regards,<br><br>-- <br>Tapani Tarvainen<br>_______________________________________________<br>Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br>Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org<br>https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss<br></div></body></html>