<div dir="ltr"><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Wolfgang brought up the collaboration of NCSG and ALAC and its improvement on a thread on NCUC mailing list, I thought I bring it up here and give it some thoughts. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">ALAC and NCSG have long been working with one another. This relation existed since Rafik was the chair of NCSG and he had maintained a connection with ALAC and worked with Olivier. (Rafik can add more details but this is what I heard was happening during Rafik time). When I was the chair of NCUC we started our joint NCUC/At Large outreach, that tradition is still in place until now. We also did an NCSG/ALAC outreach during the policy forum in Panama.<br></div></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">No doubt there is some more work to be done. We have some convergences but we also have some commonalities. NCSG invited them to NCSG open session in Barcelona which they kindly accepted and we will have a 30-minute discussion with them. <br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I think what NCSG needs to do instead of thinking about who to just collaborate with, is what goals we are pursuing and then see where we can forge connections and relations. We diverge on some issues with ALAC and on some issues we have commonalities. We clarify these and see if we can support each other's work when we have commonalities.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Some might think that because we criticize ALAC's governance or are not in favor of excessively funding ALAC efforts, we are against them. We are not against ALAC. We provide our opinion and feedback when asked (for example in case of the recent review or the budget). We initiate collaboration when there are commonalities and we do events with them. We should also remember that ALAC does not have solely a civil society position but an end user position which includes businesses etc. So we don't always hold hands. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Best <br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Farzaneh </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div>
</div>