<div><div dir="auto">Dear Farzaneh and Bruna,</div></div><div dir="auto">I really did not know what Farzaneh meant here because this seems to me as looking for excuses.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">You had brought this issue earlier and I reworked the document afresh. It all arose from the fact that I resaved without accompanying comments.this was corrected when my attention was drawn to it in the V1B document and I urged us to use this as most current and requested further comments, but you did not respond to that before it was shared for community comment by FC chairman.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">What I did as the penholder after you unilaterally removed it and eventually return access was to rework the document afresh and requested if there is any other thing based on the comments you made, especially on obligation. I also explained that I did not resolve issues I am not sure of was resolved that is why you can see unresolved comments.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">So using it as an excuse here is trying to paint the FC and myself in bad colour, which invariably you have succeeded in doing because I just saw the note from Bruna, which is not the fact. It's a mischief to say the least and I do not think that will get NCSG or FC anywhere.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Creating such an impression is too inimical for any success, please let's be guided. I am not aware this FC is interested in fighting anyone or group, but to contribute it's quota in repositioning NCSG FC, pure and simple.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">If you have any concern do bring them on, the Operating Procedures (OP) for NCSG-FC is not and cannot be exclusive to the current FC and is meant to live much beyond it. Undue allegations as raised in your mail is uncalled for and can best be described as diversion.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I will reiterate once again that frustrating FC as an agenda by anyone will not help NCSG strengthen its processes and it's important we get over the teething challenges beyond individual human ego, rather it leaves a lot of suspicions and I am very sure this current FC is not focusing on and will likely not focus on as far as I am concerned.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Best of the day</div><div dir="auto">Remmy</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:35 PM farzaneh badii <<a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@gmail.com">farzaneh.badii@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Remmy and Thato </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Since for many of the points I raised on the doc, the penholder did not come up with any compromise, nor remove the language and or just pose the issues as questions to be responded to later and kept the original language and it now posted on the list, and since my suggestion for inviting those who drafted the charter to tell us about the obligations of FC and the meaning of the charter is being rejected I have to post the link to the documents with all the comments that were not resolved. I can't argue more than 10 times over one point.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xUEOsE5Ju4ZnmJKK3M43cHWltrElt1W5YPy2LOaT9r4/edit?usp=sharing" style="color:rgb(17,85,204);font-size:small;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xUEOsE5Ju4ZnmJKK3M43cHWltrElt1W5YPy2LOaT9r4/edit?usp=sharing</a><br></div></div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Farzaneh<br></div><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:28 AM James Gannon <<a href="mailto:james@cyberinvasion.net" target="_blank">james@cyberinvasion.net</a>> wrote:<br></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word;line-break:after-white-space">
NCSG is not NCUC+NPOC, these are three separate entities, myself and others have tried to impress this open the FC for 2 weeks with no change in your position.
<div>Until this distinction is understood these OP cannot be approved as their baseline is incorrect.<br>
<div><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>On 17 Jul 2018, at 14:27, Remmy Nweke <<a href="mailto:remmyn@gmail.com" target="_blank">remmyn@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="m_-527106356510745171m_5579412824713180602Apple-interchange-newline">
<div>
<div dir="auto" style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none">
I have copied and pasted below a part of the charter under Section 2.6 outside the charge for FC to account for all funds received by NCSG (NPOC and NCUC).</div>
<br class="m_-527106356510745171m_5579412824713180602Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
_______________________________________________<br>
Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br>
</blockquote></div></blockquote></div></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Remmy Nweke, Esq
lead strategist/group executive editor,
DigitalSENSE Africa Media Ltd, publishers of:
[DigitalSENSE Business News | ITRealms | NaijaAgroNet]
Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza
Bolade Junction, Oshodi, Lagos-Nigeria
234-8023122558, 8051000475, 08033592762, 08172004283
<a href="mailto:Remmyn@gmail.com">Remmyn@gmail.com</a></div>