<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Thanks, Jeremy. I just asked them to clarify again. If that is the case, then great.  A better understanding of their abuse policy and take down policy would be also good which I think we will discuss during the meeting. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Farzaneh </font></div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Jeremy Malcolm <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jmalcolm@eff.org" target="_blank">jmalcolm@eff.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><span class="">
    On 21/9/17 9:05 pm, farzaneh badii wrote:<br>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div>
        <div>One of the agenda items that I think NCUC would be
          interested in is their takedown policy. If you remember, PIR
          wanted to come up with the Systematic Alternative Dispute
          Resolution which would resolve copyright related disputes
          through a third party. We opposed their plan and especially
          asked them not to develop the policy any further. 
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I am not sure of the
            status of this policy but they asked how they can seek
            public comment for the dispute resolution and we again
            responded that we disagree with having such policy in the
            first place.</div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br></span>
    FWIW I spoke to Brian Cute from PIR back in July and he told me that
    the policy had been permanently shelved.<br>
    <br>
    <pre class="m_8912546950746962196moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Jeremy Malcolm
Senior Global Policy Analyst
Electronic Frontier Foundation
<a class="m_8912546950746962196moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://eff.org" target="_blank">https://eff.org</a>
<a class="m_8912546950746962196moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jmalcolm@eff.org" target="_blank">jmalcolm@eff.org</a>

Tel: <a href="tel:(415)%20436-9333" value="+14154369333" target="_blank">415.436.9333 ext 161</a>

:: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::

Public key: <a class="m_8912546950746962196moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.eff.org/files/2016/11/27/key_jmalcolm.txt" target="_blank">https://www.eff.org/files/<wbr>2016/11/27/key_jmalcolm.txt</a>
PGP fingerprint: 75D2 4C0D 35EA EA2F 8CA8 8F79 4911 EC4A EDDF 1122</pre>
  </div>

<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-<wbr>bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-<wbr>discuss</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>