<p dir="ltr">James to back up the onus of prove, I think the allegation should show evidence not likely bribery.<br>
So over to Raoul.<br>
Regards<br>
Remmy</p>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Nov 25, 2016 12:07 PM, "James Gannon" <<a href="mailto:james@cyberinvasion.net">james@cyberinvasion.net</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:14px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<div>
<div>
<div>Im sorry Raoul but I would appreciate if you would engage with my questions rather than dismissing them out of hand. These are serious concerns, and as someone who has spent almost 3 years working on building bridges and relationships in ICANN between
us and other stakeholders I would like to see you back up your accusations. Conspiracy and fear have no place in the ICANN and NCUC I wish to participate in.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>So please be more specific, who do you think is being bribed and by whom?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-James</div>
<div>
<div id="m_-8017229401097760966MAC_OUTLOOK_SIGNATURE"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>/I have changed the title to split this off from the originating conversation./</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="m_-8017229401097760966OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:12pt;text-align:left;color:black;BORDER-BOTTOM:medium none;BORDER-LEFT:medium none;PADDING-BOTTOM:0in;PADDING-LEFT:0in;PADDING-RIGHT:0in;BORDER-TOP:#b5c4df 1pt solid;BORDER-RIGHT:medium none;PADDING-TOP:3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Raoul Plommer <<a href="mailto:plommer@gmail.com" target="_blank">plommer@gmail.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Friday 25 November 2016 at 09:51<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>James Gannon <<a href="mailto:james@cyberinvasion.net" target="_blank">james@cyberinvasion.net</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>NCUC-discuss <<a href="mailto:ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>>, Johan Helsingius <<a href="mailto:julf@julf.com" target="_blank">julf@julf.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] NomCom Review<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:-webkit-standard;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
This is big business to the tune of billions. I think it's ludicrous to state that bribery never takes place in ICANN. People get killed for far less monies. But this is besides my point and it's insistence can be seen as a willing effort to derail the real
conversation we should be having.</div>
<br class="m_-8017229401097760966Apple-interchange-newline">
</span>
</div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>