<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p>It is unfortunate that the original perspectives and issues from
      early on in this process are not reflected in the new paper and
      certainly not in the second half which is - as Ed describes below
      - entirely and very unfortunately focussed on getting rid of the
      house structure.  <br>
    </p>
    <p>Attached are the early "findings" that reflect a far broader and
      more representative set of issues of concern to GNSO.   Some of
      these I think we could have agreed to work on - but these are not
      in the new paper.<br>
    </p>
    <p>Matthew<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03/11/2016 01:44, Edward Morris
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:3DAE00A5-A43D-452C-8599-E32F2E3FFE56@toast.net"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <div>Fellow NCUC members,</div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
      </div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature">At last year's intercessional meeting
        the CSG and NPOC combined to cause creation of this GNSO Futures
        group. Arriving late due to flight problems, I opposed creation
        of a NCPH working group such as this as being completely
        illegitimate and inimical to the interests of the NCUC. Too
        late. The group was formed.</div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
      </div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature">This report by Tony Holmes is a
        completely biased farce. It is the CSG's wet dream with all
        proposed "solutions" to the "problem" of the GNSO House
        structure calling for the elimination of the House structure.
        That is not in the interest of the NCUC nor is further
        participation in this group. Any consideration of the future of
        the GNSO should be done alongside our partners in the Contracted
        Party House. The NCPH is a voting structure that has served us
        well, not an organisational cohort with which we should be
        involved in as a policy making or proposing institution.</div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
      </div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature">I am not a member of the GNSO Futures
        Group as I opposed its creation and existence. Let me state my
        belief that the House structure has served the NCUC and the
        noncommercial community well and that any switch to a
         constituency based structure is contrary to the interests of
        the NCUC and our members. The Westlake study, despite its many
        flaws, correctly did not support structural change in the GNSO
        at this time. This so called Futures group and this report is
        nothing more than a backwards run around the proper and
        legitimate GNSO review that included all components of the GNSO.
        Therefore:</div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
      </div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature">1. I ask all NCUC members of this
        group to oppose publication of this report;</div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
      </div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature">2. I would ask the NCUC EC and our
        membership to reconsider our participation in this group and, in
        fact, to affirmatively cease our support of and participation in
        this group in any way, shape and manner.</div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
      </div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature">I would also suggest that once
        consensus in this matter is reached within the NCUC we reach out
        to our colleagues in NPOC to discuss this matter. I do not
        believe empowerment of the CSG, the end result of any of the
        "reform" options, is in the interest of any component of the
        NCSG. </div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
      </div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature">In our Council meeting next week we
        will be considering approval of a drafting team (DT) report that
        brings the transition reforms into the GNSO. The four members of
        the NCUC who participated on the DT (myself, Farzi, Matt and
        Amr) worked diligently and successfully to port the new powers
        into the GNSO based upon the current house structure within
        Council. We did so with the full support of RrSG and RySG. They,
        not the CSG, are our true partners in structural issues within
        the GNSO. We should no longer participate in a GNSO review that
        excludes them. This proposed report is an example of how giving
        the NCPH legitimacy as  anything more than a voting algorithm is
        not in our interest. </div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
      </div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature">Kind Regards,</div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
      </div>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature">Ed Morris <br>
        <br>
        Sent from my iPhone</div>
      <div><br>
        Begin forwarded message:<br>
        <br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div><b>From:</b> Chantelle Doerksen <<a
            moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:chantelle.doerksen@icann.org"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:chantelle.doerksen@icann.org">chantelle.doerksen@icann.org</a></a>><br>
          <b>Date:</b> 3 November 2016 at 02:54:51 GMT+5:30<br>
          <b>To:</b> "<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:ncph-gnsofutures@icann.org">ncph-gnsofutures@icann.org</a>"
          <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:ncph-gnsofutures@icann.org">ncph-gnsofutures@icann.org</a>><br>
          <b>Subject:</b> <b>[Ncph-gnsofutures] ICANN57: GNSO Futures
            Meeting - Agenda/Presentation | Thursday, 3 November, 13:45
            - 15:00 | Room: G.03/04</b><br>
          <br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><span></span></div>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div>
          <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
            charset=utf-8">
          <meta name="Title" content="">
          <meta name="Keywords" content="">
          <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
            medium)">
          <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:Calibri;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#0563C1;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#954F72;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-compose;
        font-family:Calibri;
        color:windowtext;}
span.msoIns
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        mso-style-name:"";
        text-decoration:underline;
        color:teal;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-family:Calibri;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
          <div class="WordSection1">
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Dear
                all,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">In
                advance of the GNSO Futures meeting to be held during
                ICANN57 on Thursday afternoon, please see Tony Holmes’
                note below and related attachment.
                <o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Kind
                regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Chantelle<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Meeting
                details:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><b><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt">GNSO
                    Futures | ICANN57 Schedule Link:
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://sched.co/8czi">http://sched.co/8czi</a>
                    <o:p></o:p></span></u></b></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> Room:
                G.03/04<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Time:
                13:45 – 15:00 local time (UTC+5.30)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Adobe
                Connect:<u> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="https://participate.icann.org/hyd57-g3-c/">
                    https://participate.icann.org/hyd57-g3-c/</a><o:p></o:p></u></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">___________________<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Dear
                all, <o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">The
                attached report has no official status, but will be
                discussed during the GNSO Futures session to be held on
                Thursday 13.45 to 15.00.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">The
                attached report summarises the status of the discussions
                presented during the last GNSO Futures Conference call
                with the addition of a number of possible options for
                structural change in Section 7. None of those scenarios
                have been discussed; however, they are put forward as a
                starting point and will form the basis for discussion on
                agenda items 4 and 5.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Draft
                  Agenda – NCPH GNOS Futures Group session<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Thursday,
                3 November 13.45 to 15.00<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">1.      
                Introductions<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">2.      
                Adoption of agenda<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">3.      
                Update on status of discussions<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">4.      
                Interim Draft report<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">5.      
                Key questions:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><i><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt">-          Is there support
                  to publish a draft report within the NCPH for the
                  record?<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><i><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt">-          If so should that
                  report include the identification of future options
                  and a rationale outlining each approach (Sections 7
                  and 8)?<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><i><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt">-          The possible
                  expansion of those section to include other options?<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><i><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt">-          Is there a need
                  for this group to continue its activities?<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><i><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt">-          Next steps and how
                  best to proceed?<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">6.      
                Agreement on the way forward<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">7.      
                AoB<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
          <span>Ncph-gnsofutures mailing list</span><br>
          <span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:Ncph-gnsofutures@icann.org">Ncph-gnsofutures@icann.org</a></span><br>
          <span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-gnsofutures">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-gnsofutures</a></span><br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss">http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987</pre>
  
<br /><br />
<hr style='border:none; color:#909090; background-color:#B0B0B0; height: 1px; width: 99%;' />
<table style='border-collapse:collapse;border:none;'>
        <tr>
                <td style='border:none;padding:0px 15px 0px 8px'>
                        <a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient">
                                <img border=0 src="http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png" alt="Avast logo" />
                        </a>
                </td>
                <td>
                        <p style='color:#3d4d5a; font-family:"Calibri","Verdana","Arial","Helvetica"; font-size:12pt;'>
                                This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
                                <br><a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient">www.avast.com</a>
                        </p>
                </td>
        </tr>
</table>
<br />
</body>
</html>