<p dir="ltr">Hi Ed.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Thanks for your interest and your detailled message.</p>
<p dir="ltr">As matter of fact, you are mentioning a report of the kickoff confcall to start the planning for intersessional meeting, held this Friday. The report was shared in NCUC EC list but there was no discussion yet as you know. Members can check that email in the NCUC EC list so they can make their opinion <a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2016-October/003143.html">http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2016-October/003143.html</a> </p>
<p dir="ltr">I couldn't attend the call so I was chairing the CCWG diversity subgroup call as co-rapporteur in the same time . As you know diversity as topic has a strong interest among NCUC membership.</p>
<p dir="ltr">While I couldn't attend, I suggested : to not hold the meeting in an US city again and thinking about having it as pre-event for icann meeting B instead for some reasons. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Yes like many I don't have the luxury to be away for long time from work and family and I usually take that on my limited holidays. The meeting B in johanesburg next year is shorter by design and also focused on policy. I think CCWG meeting will be held in sunday as happened in Helsinki meeting and we can avoid any clash.<br>
It is more easier for people to add 2 days to 5 days meeting than taking 5 or 6 separate days off (at least depending on the itinerary) to attend a standalone meeting such the intersessional. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Having it in Johanesburg also means a possible outreach and also having the opportunity to members to attend the meeting and not just the leadership. <br>
I have no specific position about Iceland why I know that we have to consider issues such visa and itineraries for those from LAC, Africa and APAC. <br>
At least Hyderabad meeting made all of us equals with regard to visa hurdles and difficulties, something some of us have to handle for every ICANN meeting. </p>
<p dir="ltr">It is too early to dismiss any option or push for a specific one and we will have to see all pros and cons according to objective criteria. When we get more information and suggestions, I think we can make a decision with acceptable trade-off.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Hope that helps.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Best,</p>
<p dir="ltr">Rafik <br></p>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Oct 22, 2016 11:12 AM, "Edward Morris" <<a href="mailto:egmorris1@toast.net">egmorris1@toast.net</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span style="font-family:'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',Sans-Serif;font-size:14px"><div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">Hi everybody,</span></span></div>
<div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">A bit of history: since the NCPH intercessional meeting was started four years ago every meeting has been held in the United States. The CSG contingent is largely US based. We are far more diverse. That’s why I support any and all efforts to have the next such meeting hosted outside the boundaries of the USA.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">I understand a bit why the meeting is unlikely to happen in Asia or South America or Africa. I would support holding a meeting in any of those regions. Unfortunately the budget for the intercessional meeting is not large and because of the CSG’s largely American composition bringing attendees to most, if not all, of those regions is not within the budget. Zika is also an issue for some, whether a rational concern or not.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">I should note that rotating the meeting between ICANN’s three hub cities – Los Angeles, Singapore and Istanbul – makes a lot of sense to me but then again I also supported putting ICANN Meetings themselves on a similar rotation. Apparently doing the rotation for the intercessional is also a no go.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">I was pleasantly surprised when I learned that at long last Reykjavik appears to be getting serious consideration for a small group ICANN meeting. I had argued for CCWG F2F meetings to be held there but without success. Reykjavik just makes sense.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">Thus, I was sad to see on the NCUC EC page that this wonderful city was disparaged as “some city in Iceland (please forgive me I will never ever be able to spell that city’s name).” I was happy to learn that some in the noncommercial community do support Reykjavik. Just apparently not within the NCUC EC leadership. Again, sad.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">One of the NCUC suggestions was that the intercessional meeting be attached to a normal Meeting, at the beginning or end. I strongly oppose that idea for the following reasons:</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">1. ICANN meetings are already too long.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">For those who are single, are students, academics, unemployed or unattached it might be easy to pop off for 10 days to two weeks a few times a year. For the rest of of us it is not. I would find it much easier to get away for a three day and a five day meeting (two meetings) than I would for a single eight day meeting. I suspect I am not alone with this preference.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">2. The front end of meetings are already used by other groups.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">The CCWG will be meeting prior to the next three Meetings. Many NCUC members volunteer on the CCWG. Do we proceed to have an intercessional without these volunteers? Or do we extend the meeting even longer?</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">3. People are tired after an ICANN Meeting.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">Do we want to meet for a few days at the end of an ICANN Meeting? After a week of nonstop work I’m not sure it would be productive to add another few days of work to the schedule. I doubt many would stick around to participate. Those who do may have the battles of the previous week on their mind. I know I would. I’m not sure I would be up to being overly friendly to CSG members I’d just battled for several days.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">4. The whole idea of the intercessional meeting was to bring the NCPH together <em>away </em>from the ICANN Meeting, where things could be a bit more relaxed. </span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">This was a poor idea and I’m sorry to see the NCUC proposing it.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">I was happy to see the NCUC suggest Singapore as a possible meeting site (see above). I’m sorry the budget seems not to allow for it.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">I understand from posts by our representatives to the planning meeting that the cities that may have received traction are Washington, Boston and Reykjavik. Two years ago the intercession was in DC. Do we need to go back to the U.S. capital every two years? Remember that thing called the transition? Or do we go to Boston: my birthplace, but only a whole 7 hours drive away from Washington in the same country? One country, one internet?</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">Why Reykjavik, or as it was called in a post on the NCUC EC message board, “some city in Iceland”? Because it just makes sense.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">1. Ease of travel</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">The large of majority of intercessional attendees come from either Europe or the east coast of the United States. Here are some nonstop travel times to Reykjavik:</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">Berlin: 3 hours 45 minutes</span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">Boston: 5 hours 5 minutes</span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">London: 3 hours 10 minutes</span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">New York: 5 hours 25 minutes</span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">Paris: 3 hours 30 minutes</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">Shared pain. Yes, Reykjavik is in Europe but it is fairly close to North America. Of great importance when travelling in winter there are nonstop flights to Reykjavik from a surprising number of North American cities, east and west coasts, and European cities, north and south (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keflav%C3%ADk_International_Airport" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/<wbr>wiki/Keflav%C3%ADk_<wbr>International_Airport</a> ). I had weather related connection problems while transiting to two of the three intercessions I was supposed to attend. Nonstop flights lessen that possibility.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">Those coming from outside these two regions will need to change planes to get to Iceland, the same as many have to do no matter where we may hold the meeting.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">2. Cost</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">The US Department of State per diem rate for Reykjavik is $318 a day (includes all expenses, including accommodation. Compare that to Paris ($497) or London ($468).</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">3. Infrastructure</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">Iceland is a modern Nordic country. Things work and the meeting infrastructure is fantastic: <a href="http://www.meetinreykjavik.is/planyourevent" target="_blank">http://www.meetinreykjavik.is/<wbr>planyourevent</a> .</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">4. Weather</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">It’s not the tropics, but in February Reykjavik’s average high temperature of 39 degrees F is actually 2 degrees higher than Boston – an apparent alternate choice.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">5. Attractiveness</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">We’re there to work and Iceland has excellent facilities for that. For those who also like fine dining Icelandic seafood and lamb are world famous. Pollution, traffic congestion: non existent. Sightseeing, unique and tremendous. Nightlife: voted many times being amongst the best on earth.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">The big thing though is work. This is a two day meeting. Reykjavik offers the potential to bring the greatest number of attendees to a central location with the least amount of travel wear and tear. Is it perfect for anyone? No. Is it good for many? Yes.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">It certainly is worthy of consideration. And as a non US resident I would have serious reservations travelling once again to the USA for the intercessional meeting. Is it too much to ask that it be held outside of the USA once every four or five years? I will also note that the NCUC has more members based in Europe than in any other region (<a href="http://www.ncuc.org/about/members/" target="_blank">http://www.ncuc.org/about/<wbr>members/</a> ). How about making the CSG folks have to travel to the region we have the most members for once?</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">Having said all of this I would also opine that I don’t really see the value in even having the intercessional meeting. It seems to largely exist to allow the CSG members to lobby staff. No wonder they want to keep having it in the country with the most ICANN staff. Perhaps instead of debating where we should be having the meeting we should be debating whether to have it at all.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">If we are going to have it, though, and there are some good reasons to do so, let’s really consider the options, without disparaging one of the most remarkable cities and societies in the world. Reykjavik, the capital of the country with the oldest Parliament in the world (the Althing, founded 930), is not all that hard to spell. It’s also very easy to get to, has tremendous facilities, reasonable costs, and a wonderful democratic tradition. All reasons why the intercessional should be held there. At least once.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">Reykjavik: it just makes sense.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">Ed</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">- It makes sense particularly for the NCUC. I note that the NCUC currently has no members in Iceland. As a technologically advanced country with high education levels and high levels of English competence, a country that has led the world in privacy and online free speech initiatives, this is surprising. This should be prime NCUC membership territory. If we take the intercessional to Reykjavik, do some outreach, it just very well may become one of our more prolific countries in terms of membership. Demographically and ideologically it should be. Given Iceland’s unequaled democratic tradition it’s also a place we may be able to learn from ourselves as we transition ICANN into it’s exciting new era.</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">More information:</span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif">Let’s Meet In The Middle: <a href="https://vimeo.com/77711285" target="_blank">https://vimeo.com/77711285</a></span></span></div>
</div>
<div> </div></span>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>