<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">Hi Jeremy,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Thanks for the proposing, I do think that is doable and probably we can other groups interested.</div><div class="gmail_extra">let's work on this proposal.</div><div class="gmail_extra">waiting for other suggestions for topics.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Best,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Rafik<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-08-10 5:47 GMT+09:00 Jeremy Malcolm <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jmalcolm@eff.org" target="_blank">jmalcolm@eff.org</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span class="">
<p>On 9/08/2016 6:59 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">in fact it is unclear: since Helsinki meeting and
with new meeting format, the planning and meeting request
process is different than it was previously. I also highlights
that SO/AC leaders are involved in the process e.g. GNSO chair
and vice-chairs. we didn't have enough visibility for Helsinki
and hope that things would be more smooth for Hydrabad.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>we usually go via GNSO secretariat or our admin support for
meeting requests for NCUC sessions. I already tasked Maryam to
liaise with ICANN meeting team to get more details about the
process and meeting skeleton. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>back to high interest topics, previously ICANN staff asked
SO/AC, stakeholder group and constituency chairs inputs in
consultation with their own groups. I guess we can for NCUC in
coordination with NCSG discuss some cross-community topics we
would like to riase. then Maryam or myself on behalf of NCUC
can submit the proposal(s) .</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
Back in Dublin we had discussed having a session on intermediary
liability as it affects the domain name industry. The idea is to
push back against the notion that registries and registrars are
responsible for policing the content of websites hosted at their
domains, and also to keep a watch on industry schemes such as the
Healthy Domains Initiative.<br>
<br>
This would also tie in with two EFF/joint campaigns, firstly the
Manila Principles on Intermediary Liability, and second our
soon-to-be-launched "Shadow Regulation" project which is about how
industry agreements can have real regulatory impacts on users which
avoid public scrutiny and accountability.<br>
<br>
I would love to be involved in promoting this as a high interest
topic, either through NCUC or separately.<br>
<br>
<pre cols="72">--
Jeremy Malcolm
Senior Global Policy Analyst
Electronic Frontier Foundation
<a href="https://eff.org" target="_blank">https://eff.org</a>
<a href="mailto:jmalcolm@eff.org" target="_blank">jmalcolm@eff.org</a>
Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161
:: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::
Public key: <a href="https://www.eff.org/files/2014/10/09/key_jmalcolm.txt" target="_blank">https://www.eff.org/files/<wbr>2014/10/09/key_jmalcolm.txt</a>
PGP fingerprint: FF13 C2E9 F9C3 DF54 7C4F EAC1 F675 AAE2 D2AB 2220
OTR fingerprint: 26EE FD85 3740 8228 9460 49A8 536F BCD2 536F A5BD</pre>
</div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>