<html><body>
<div style="font-size: 16px; font-family: tahoma; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);
font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; background-image: none;
background-attachment: scroll; background-origin: padding-box;
background-clip: border-box; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);
background-size: auto; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat
repeat;">Thanks for your comments Carlos. Very interesting for a relative
newbie to read.</div>
<div style="font-size: 16px; font-family: tahoma; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);
font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; background-image: none;
background-attachment: scroll; background-origin: padding-box;
background-clip: border-box; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);
background-size: auto; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat
repeat;"> </div>
<div style="font-size: 16px; font-family: tahoma; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);
font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; background-image: none;
background-attachment: scroll; background-origin: padding-box;
background-clip: border-box; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);
background-size: auto; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat
repeat;">The solution, in my view, is quite easy and commonsensical. We
merely need to convert ICANN from being a California Public Benefits
Corporation without members to being a California Public Benefits
Corporation with members, per §5310 - §5313 of the California
Corporations Code.</div>
<div style="font-size: 16px; font-family: tahoma; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);
font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; background-image: none;
background-attachment: scroll; background-origin: padding-box;
background-clip: border-box; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);
background-size: auto; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat
repeat;"> </div>
<div style="font-size: 16px; font-family: tahoma; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);
font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; background-image: none;
background-attachment: scroll; background-origin: padding-box;
background-clip: border-box; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);
background-size: auto; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat
repeat;">This certainly isn't a new idea but in my view it remains the
best one. With one minor jump through the Corporations Code,
ICANN's problems with accountability and Board legitimacy
disappear. Mostly. Details are important - who are the members, for example
- but workable. It should be noted that most PBC's do have
members, it is ICANN that is the outlier. </div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px;
font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; background-image: none;
background-attachment: scroll; background-origin: padding-box;
background-clip: border-box; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);
background-size: auto; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat
repeat;">
<blockquote style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px;
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">-----Original
Message-----<br />
From: "Carlos A. Afonso" <ca@cafonso.ca><br />
To: Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>, Kathy Kleiman
<kathy@kathykleiman.com>, "ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org"
<ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org><br />
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:06:29 -0300<br />
Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC Delegate to the 2015 NomCom<br />
<div style="font-family: monospace, courier new, courier">Yes, we
"old-timers" recall the "big bang" of this -- the
attempt to<br />
elect board members through a planetary electoral process of the<br />
Internet users in general, the so-called "netizens", a disaster
which<br />
ended up giving birth to this thing called ALAC.<br />
<br />
Some people might think that the RIRs/NRO's method of electing board<br
/>
members gives control to holders of number resources and not "to the<br
/>
people". But does a NomCom provide any better solution to this<br />
representation issue? BTW, I have never heard of this being a<br />
significant problem in our NCUC dialogues, as we are historically mostly<br
/>
concentrated on gTLD issues and processes -- not even with the current<br />
IPv6 transition "crisis".<br />
<br />
If ICANN ends up taking care of gTLDs only (and I agree we have to think<br
/>
about how to separate policy from operation), and the board is elected<br />
only by direct votes of domain name holders (registrants), there are<br />
mechanisms to make sure there is equanimous representation irrespective<br />
of the numbers of each domain etc.<br />
<br />
[] fraterno<br />
<br />
--c.a.<br />
<br />
On 08/25/2014 10:52 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:<br />
> Yes, it's true, Carlos, the current board selection arrangements
are an incoherent mess and their incoherence derives mainly from the utter
panic that certain ICANN founders felt at the prospect of subjecting control
of ICANN's board to a vote of members - even though that is the norm in
many other areas.<br />
><br />
> Milton L Mueller<br />
> Laura J and L. Douglas Meredith Professor<br />
> Syracuse University School of Information Studies<br />
> <a href="http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/" target="_blank">
http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/</a><br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
>> -----Original Message-----<br />
>> From: Carlos A. Afonso [mailto:<a href="mailto:ca%40cafonso.ca">
ca@cafonso.ca</a>]<br />
>> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 8:56 AM<br />
>> To: Milton L Mueller; Kathy Kleiman; <a
href="mailto:ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
<br />
>> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC Delegate to the 2015 NomCom<br />
>><br />
>> In any case we do need to think of a better representation with the
abolition<br />
>> of the NomCom once and for all, and with moving representation from
the<br />
>> contractor-"owner" relationship to the user or consumer
of the resource.<br />
>><br />
>> In the case of ccTLDs there are some good straightforward examples
-- CIRA's<br />
>> board is elected by the domain name holders, not registrars
(although its<br />
>> contracts -- both CIRA's and the domain holder -- are with
registrars).<br />
>><br />
>> If the IANA transition concludes with the IP addressing being
managed by<br />
>> some I* arrangement ex-ICANN (like formalizing NRO as the IP
addressing<br />
>> governance body, something which is basically already happening
in<br />
>> practice), and since ccTLDs are managed in practice by the
respective bodies<br />
>> in each country (with a large variety of approaches), ICANN would
be left<br />
>> with the business of gTLDs only. I may be not accurate, but I think
all the RIRs<br />
>> elect their boards much like LACNIC.<br />
>><br />
>> If this were so, ICANN's board could be elected by the gTLD
domain name<br />
>> holders' community, in a direct mechanism which would ensure<br
/>
>> proportionality (otherwise .com would always elect most if not all
board<br />
>> members).<br />
>><br />
>> fraternal regards<br />
>><br />
>> --c.a.<br />
>><br />
>> On 08/24/2014 07:08 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:<br />
>>> I think Kathy makes an important point. ICANN's contracts
are with<br />
>> registries and registrars, and more than 90% of its budget comes
from them.<br />
>> This of course indirectly affects individual and organizational
registrants such<br />
>> as the people we are supposed to represent. The idea that a board
selected<br />
>> primarily by ccTLDs and RIRs would be deciding issues that are 90%
domains<br />
>> doesn't make a lot of sense, either from an equity or an
efficiency<br />
>> standpoint.<br />
>>><br />
>>> --MM<br />
>>><br />
>>>> -----Original Message-----<br />
>>>> From: <a
href="mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces%40lists.ncuc.org">
ncuc-discuss-bounces@lists.ncuc.org</a> [mailto:ncuc-discuss-<br />
>>>> <a href="mailto:bounces%40lists.ncuc.org">
bounces@lists.ncuc.org</a>] On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman<br />
>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2014 10:51 AM<br />
>>>> To: <a href="mailto:ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">
ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br />
>>>> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC Delegate to the 2015
NomCom<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> All,<br />
>>>> My gut sense says that we should study this proposal
closely. It<br />
>>>> gives an awful lot of weight and votes to Supporting
Organizations<br />
>>>> that do not, themselves, allow ICANN a role in their
governance (ASO,<br />
>>>> ccNSO), but would now be having a much greater weight in
appointing<br />
>>>> representatives to our governance (namely the Board and its
work with<br />
>> GNSO issues). The implications could be astounding.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> I recommend that we talk more. I would value the review and
input of<br />
>>>> those who served on the Nominating Committee, those who
have a<br />
>> strong<br />
>>>> knowledge of the other supporting organizations, and
everyone.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Like the proposal to change the GAC's power, this is
one with great<br />
>>>> implications for the GNSO.<br />
>>>> Best,<br />
>>>> Kathy<br />
>>>> p.s. how does 5 GNSO representatives but only 3 votes mean?
Can<br />
>>>> anyone previously on the NomCom talk about some
complexities that<br />
>>>> might add (currently I think it is one rep, one vote).<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> Hi,<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Further, i neglected to say, i think they thought it
through in<br />
>>>>> admirable fashion and make sense.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> I see their solution as being fair. I suggest we
do not oppose it,<br />
>>>>> neither as a constituency nor as SG, but rather comment
individually<br />
>>>>> if we wish.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> avri<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> On 22-Aug-14 16:52, avri doria wrote:<br />
>>>>>> The only people losing votes are csg Why is
that a problem for ncsg?<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Business is not our business. And as the lone civil
society sg, we<br />
>>>>>> should ally ourselves more with other non
business.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> I do not see this as a bad thing.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> avri<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> -------- Original message --------<br />
>>>>>> From: Kathy Kleiman<br />
>>>>>> Date:08/22/2014 4:21 PM (GMT-05:00)<br />
>>>>>> To: <a href="mailto:ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">
ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br />
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC Delegate to the
2015 NomCom<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Wow, if these rules are adopted, we (the GNSO)
would be outvoted by<br />
>>>>>> Supporting Organizations who do not allow ICANN to
run their<br />
>>>>>> businesses (ccNSO and ASO). This is a real
problem.<br />
>>>>>> Best,<br />
>>>>>> Kathy<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> :<br />
>>>>>>> Carlos,<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> While it may not go away soon, it may look
substantially different<br />
>>>>>>> in the future. The Board Working Group Report
on Nominating<br />
>>>>>>> Committee<br />
>>>>>>> (BWG-NomCom) was just released for public
comment. I'm still<br />
>>>>>>> digesting what they've recommended, but
they propose some<br />
>>>>>>> substantial<br />
>>>> changes:<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> <a
href="https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bwg-nomcom-2014-08-21-"
target="_blank">
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bwg-nomcom-2014-08-21-</a><br />
>> en<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> I encourage everyone to take a moment to read
through this.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> -Brenden<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Carlos A.
Afonso <<a href="mailto:ca%40cafonso.ca">ca@cafonso.ca</a><br />
>>>>>>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ca%40cafonso.ca">
ca@cafonso.ca</a>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Since this NomCom
concoction will not go away any soon, I of<br />
>> course<br />
>>>>>>> support Brenden.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> --c.a.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> On 08/22/2014 02:59 PM,
Marilia Maciel wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> > Yes, +1 to Brenden.<br
/>
>>>>>>> > Marília<br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014
at 2:37 PM, Robin Gross<br />
>>>>>>> <<a
href="mailto:robin%40ipjustice.org">robin@ipjustice.org</a> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:robin%40ipjustice.org">robin@ipjustice.org</a>><br />
>>>>>>> > <mailto:<a
href="mailto:robin%40ipjustice.org">robin@ipjustice.org</a> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:robin%40ipjustice.org">robin@ipjustice.org</a>>>><br />
>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> > Brenden
has my full support for 2nd term. NCUC is lucky<br />
>>>>>>> that he is<br />
>>>>>>> > willing
to do it again.<br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> >
Thanks,<br />
>>>>>>> > Robin<br
/>
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> > On Aug
22, 2014, at 4:10 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> >>
Hi,<br />
>>>>>>> >><br />
>>>>>>> >>
I'm all for Brenden staying on for another term as NCUC's<br />
>>>>>>> delegate<br />
>>>>>>> >> to
the NomCom. Glad he's willing.<br />
>>>>>>> >><br />
>>>>>>> >>
Thanks.<br />
>>>>>>> >><br />
>>>>>>> >>
Amr<br />
>>>>>>> >><br />
>>>>>>> >> On
Aug 22, 2014, at 9:31 AM, William Drake<br />
>>>>>>> <<a
href="mailto:wjdrake%40gmail.com">wjdrake@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:wjdrake%40gmail.com">wjdrake@gmail.com</a>><br />
>>>>>>> >>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:wjdrake%40gmail.com">wjdrake@gmail.com</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:wjdrake%40gmail.com">wjdrake@gmail.com</a>
>>><br />
>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> >><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Hi<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
We need to appoint a NCUC delegate to the 2015 ICANN<br />
>> NomCom<br />
>>>> in<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
the next week or so. It's unfortunate that NomCom's cycle<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
doesn't synch with our election cycle but c'est la vie.<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
*What is the Nomcom?*<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
ICANN's Nominating Committee (NomCom) is responsible<br />
>> for the<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
selection of eight ICANN Board Members and for other<br />
>>>>>>> selections<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
as are set forth in the Bylaws. (See Bylaws Article VII,<br />
>>>>>>> Section<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
1 <a href="athttp://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#VII-1" target="_blank">
athttp://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#VII-1</a><br />
>>>>>>> <<a
href="http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#VII-1" target="_blank">
http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#VII-1</a>>)<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
The NomCom is also charged with appointing some members<br />
>> of<br />
>>>>>>> the At<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), the Country Code Names<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Supporting Organization (ccNSO) Council and the Generic<br />
>> Names<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council. The NomCom<br />
>>>> complements<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
the other means for filling a portion of key ICANN leadership<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
positions achieved within the Supporting Organizations and<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Advisory Committees.<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Together, the NomCom and Supporting<br />
>> Organization/Advisory<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Committee selection pathways ensure that ICANN benefits<br />
>> from<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
functional, cultural and geographic diversity in its policy<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
development and decision-making as the Internet evolves.<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
*Who serves on Nomcom? *<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
ICANN's SOs and ACs send appointees to serve up to two<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
consecutive one-year terms on the Nomcom. You can read<br />
>>>>>>> more about<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
the structure here <<a href="http://nomcom.icann.org" target="_blank">
http://nomcom.icann.org</a><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
<<a href="http://nomcom.icann.org/" target="_blank">
http://nomcom.icann.org/</a>>>.<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
*Who is NCUC's current appointee to Nomcom?*<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
For 2014-2015, Brenden Kuerbis of the Internet Governance<br />
>>>>>>> Project<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
served. He took over for Rafik Dammak, who was elected to<br />
>>>>>>> NCSG Chair.<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Brenden has expressed interest to the Exec Com in<br />
>>>>>>> continuing as<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
NCUC's appointee. Despite joining midstream, he was able<br />
>>>>>>> to make<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
a positive impact from recruiting applicants to selecting<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
individuals to positions. Selections were announced on the<br />
>>>>>>> ICANN<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
website August 15<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
<<a href="https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-15-"
target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-15-</a><br />
>> en>.<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Next year is an important cycle for Nomcom. It includes<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
selections for 3 board seats and 2 NCAs to the GNSO, as<br />
>>>>>>> well as<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
other positions. Brenden has asked the EC for names of<br />
>>>>>>> people we<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
should approach about applying, as well as opportunities<br />
>>>>>>> where we<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
might do general outreach. He is also happy to speak with us<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
about the process and how NCUC can best engage it.<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Would anyone else be interested in being considered for this<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
position? If so we could have the contending applicants<br />
>> make<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
their cases here on the list and then the EC would decide<br />
>>>>>>> taking<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
into account the views expressed, an assessment of the<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
applicants' qualifications, etc. If not, the EC can just go<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
ahead and vote on Brenden's renewal.<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Let's please move on this in the next week, before the IGF.<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Thanks,<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Bill<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>> ***********************************************<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
William J. Drake<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
International Fellow & Lecturer<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
University of Zurich, Switzerland<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
ICANN, <a href="http://www.ncuc.org" target="_blank">www.ncuc.org</a>
<<a href="http://www.ncuc.org" target="_blank">http://www.ncuc.org</a>
><br />
>>>>>>> <<a
href="http://www.ncuc.org/" target="_blank">http://www.ncuc.org/</a>><br
/>
>>>>>>> >>>
<a href="mailto:william.drake%40uzh.ch">william.drake@uzh.ch</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:william.drake%40uzh.ch">william.drake@uzh.ch</a>
><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:william.drake%40uzh.ch">william.drake@uzh.ch</a>
<br />
>>>>>>> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:william.drake%40uzh.ch">william.drake@uzh.ch</a>>>
(direct), <a href="mailto:wjdrake%40gmail.com">wjdrake@gmail.com</a><br />
>>>>>>> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:wjdrake%40gmail.com">wjdrake@gmail.com</a>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:wjdrake%40gmail.com">wjdrake@gmail.com</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:wjdrake%40gmail.com">wjdrake@gmail.com</a>
>><br />
>>>> (lists),<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
<a href="http://www.williamdrake.org" target="_blank">
www.williamdrake.org</a> <<a href="http://www.williamdrake.org"
target="_blank">http://www.williamdrake.org</a>><br />
>>>>>>> <<a
href="http://www.williamdrake.org/" target="_blank">
http://www.williamdrake.org/</a>><br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>> ***********************************************<br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>>>>>>> >>><br />
>> _______________________________________________<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br />
>>>>>>> >>>
<a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">
Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br />
>>>>>>> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
><br />
>>>>>>> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
<br />
>>>>>>> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
>><br />
>>>>>>> >>>
<a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss"
target="_blank">
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br />
>>>>>>> >><br />
>>>>>>> >>
_______________________________________________<br />
>>>>>>> >>
Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br />
>>>>>>> >> <a
href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
<br />
>>>>>>> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
><br />
>>>>>>> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
<br />
>>>>>>> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
>><br />
>>>>>>> >> <a
href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss"
target="_blank">
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> >
_______________________________________________<br />
>>>>>>> >
Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br />
>>>>>>> > <a
href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
<br />
>>>>>>> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
><br />
>>>>>>> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
<br />
>>>>>>> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
>><br />
>>>>>>> > <a
href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss"
target="_blank">
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> > --<br />
>>>>>>> > *Marília
Maciel*<br />
>>>>>>> > Pesquisadora Gestora -
Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV<br />
>>>>>>> Direito Rio<br />
>>>>>>> > Researcher and
Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society -<br />
>>>>>>> FGV Law<br />
>>>>>>> > School<br />
>>>>>>> > <a
href="http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts" target="_blank">
http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts</a><br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> > DiploFoundation
associate - <a href="http://www.diplomacy.edu" target="_blank">
www.diplomacy.edu</a><br />
>>>>>>> <<a
href="http://www.diplomacy.edu" target="_blank">http://www.diplomacy.edu</a>
> <<a href="http://www.diplomacy.edu" target="_blank">
http://www.diplomacy.edu</a>><br />
>>>>>>> > PoliTICs Magazine
Advisory Committee -<br />
>> <a href="http://www.politics.org.br/" target="_blank">
http://www.politics.org.br/</a><br />
>>>>>>> > Subscribe
"Digital Rights: Latin America & the<br />
>>>>>>> > Caribbean" - <a
href="http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en" target="_blank">
http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en</a><br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>> >
_______________________________________________<br />
>>>>>>> > Ncuc-discuss mailing
list<br />
>>>>>>> > <a
href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">
Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>><br />
>>>>>>> > <a
href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss"
target="_blank">
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br />
>>>>>>> ><br />
>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________<br />
>>>>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing
list<br />
>>>>>>> <a
href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">
Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>><br />
>>>>>>> <a
href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss"
target="_blank">
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________<br />
>>>>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br />
>>>>>>> <a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">
Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br />
>>>>>>> <a
href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss"
target="_blank">
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> _______________________________________________<br
/>
>>>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br />
>>>>>> <a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">
Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br />
>>>>>> <a
href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss"
target="_blank">
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>> _______________________________________________<br />
>>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br />
>>>>> <a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">
Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br />
>>>>> <a
href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss"
target="_blank">
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> _______________________________________________<br />
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br />
>>>> <a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">
Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br />
>>>> <a
href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss"
target="_blank">
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br />
>>> _______________________________________________<br />
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br />
>>> <a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">
Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br />
>>> <a
href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss"
target="_blank">
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br />
>>><br />
><br />
_______________________________________________<br />
Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br />
<a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss%40lists.ncuc.org">
Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br />
<a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss"
target="_blank">
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body></html>