<div dir="ltr">If the NCSG doesn't have a mailman I don;t see any reason that NCUC couldn't provide that facility to the community. F'rinstance just call it <a href="mailto:ncsg-privacy@ncuc.org">ncsg-privacy@ncuc.org</a> to be clear that it group-wide list, but keep the tag as plain [privacy]. <font face="yw-b3b03f93acb29dde874548d979c14638352bd06e-2ef439d42da5ec9a52e9b1a00f4566c6--o" style></font><div>
<br></div><div>But whatever.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:28 AM, William Drake <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wjdrake@gmail.com" target="_blank">wjdrake@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi<br>
<br>
Ok, if the NCUC members who’ve said they want to work on this prefer to carry NPOC and do it as NCSG instead, then NCUC obviously cannot establish it as a NCUC Interest Group with a mailing list and position on our website. NCSG doesn’t have an independent website but does have space on the Confluence platform, so you could move it there and wiki away.<br>
<br>
Best<br>
<br>
Bill<br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
On Mar 29, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Stephanie Perrin <<a href="mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca">stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> I absolutely like the combined NCSG model, and the work is flowing from a combined NCSG presentation to the Board, so we must honour that. My nervousness about attempting to draft or reach consensus in a large group, is no doubt coloured by my incredulity at the never-ending stream of talk-no-action coming from the 1-net and IGF discussion lists. Lets give it a go, I will send the message we started with, about drafting the gap analysis, to the NCSG privacy list (assuming I am indeed on it and that it won’t take a week to rectify if I am not on it) and take it from there. Meantime my principal focus is to get the first draft done.<br>
> Thanks!<br>
> Stephanie<br>
> PS I assume <a href="mailto:privacy@ipjustice.org">privacy@ipjustice.org</a> may have folks who don’t regularly participate at ICANN on it?<br>
> On Mar 28, 2014, at 5:30 AM, Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Hi,<br>
>><br>
>> I am confused.<br>
>><br>
>> <<a href="mailto:privacy@ipjustice.org">privacy@ipjustice.org</a>> is a relatively small list. Of course it looks like it could get bigger if everyone wants to join, but I don't see that as a problem as long as it does not get as big as NCUc or the NCSG<br>
>><br>
>> I think that doing the work in a smaller open and archived group that focuses on just one subject is a good idea. I also think that we don't need separate privacy etc list for bot NCUC and NCSG. But I am one of the people that is less than excited about the competing constituency model and prefer the unified NCSG model.<br>
>><br>
>> avri<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On 28-Mar-14 15:35, Stephanie Perrin wrote:<br>
>>> I understand why you want to do this. This is a working group, to<br>
>>> draft something. I hear rumours there are 350 people on the NCSG<br>
>>> discussion list. I have worked all year trying to get basic, basic<br>
>>> concepts of data protection law understood. I am not sure drafting<br>
>>> this thing in such a big group is efficient. i have no objections<br>
>>> sending the small group's concensus draft from the working group to<br>
>>> the larger list, but I am mindful of Bill's admonition to keep the<br>
>>> traffic low. if we start discussing definitions, frameworks,<br>
>>> jurisdiction, related constitutional protections (remembering there<br>
>>> are at least 50 jurisdictions out there with data protection law,) we<br>
>>> will never get this thing done. It is supposed to be a short gap<br>
>>> analysis of their privacy policy, that is all, not a draft of a new<br>
>>> privacy policy. If that were what we are doing, then maybe we would<br>
>>> have to do it in the bigger group. Just saying. EPIC and PI found it<br>
>>> a total nightmare in recent years trying to update the Privacy and<br>
>>> Human RIghts Law Handbook, it is just too big now (see link<br>
>>> <a href="http://www.worldlii.org/int/journals/EPICPrivHR/2006/PHR2006-Defining.html" target="_blank">http://www.worldlii.org/int/journals/EPICPrivHR/2006/PHR2006-Defining.html</a>)<br>
>>> I will abide by the decision of this group, but I will also feed my<br>
>>> draft in to the EWG if we bog down and cannot reach agreement. we<br>
>>> have a major admission that they need advice, STeve is happy to get<br>
>>> it, we gotta move. Cheers SP PS Here is the link to the framework I<br>
>>> intend to reference (mostly because it is dated 2002 and I want to<br>
>>> underscore just how late ICANN is in recognizing its<br>
>>> responsibilities), referring of course to recent updates in EU law,<br>
>>> proposed regulation, and the guidance on binding corporate rules from<br>
>>> the Art 29 group.<br>
>>> <a href="http://danskprivacynet.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/ipse_finalreport1.pdf" target="_blank">http://danskprivacynet.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/ipse_finalreport1.pdf</a>.<br>
>>> If anyone can think of a decent US document to cite, I am all ears,<br>
>>> but I am not aware of one. ________________________________________<br>
>>> From: <a href="mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces@lists.ncuc.org">ncuc-discuss-bounces@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>>> <<a href="mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces@lists.ncuc.org">ncuc-discuss-bounces@lists.ncuc.org</a>> on behalf of Avri Doria<br>
>>> <<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>> Sent: March 27, 2014 10:11 PM Cc:<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org">ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] ICANN privacy<br>
>>> policy<br>
>>><br>
>>> On 27-Mar-14 13:13, Amr Elsadr wrote:<br>
>>>> I think it is important to decide early on wether we are going to<br>
>>>> have separate discussions regarding ICANN’s privacy and data<br>
>>>> protection policies within their own corporate practices and<br>
>>>> within the policies developed through the GNSO impacting<br>
>>>> obligations imposed on contracted parties, or not.<br>
>>><br>
>>> I suggest we stick to one NCSG wide discussion space for all of<br>
>>> this.<br>
>>><br>
>>> avri _______________________________________________ Ncuc-discuss<br>
>>> mailing list <a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br>
<br>
</div></div>***********************************************<br>
William J. Drake<br>
International Fellow & Lecturer<br>
Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ<br>
University of Zurich, Switzerland<br>
Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,<br>
ICANN, <a href="http://www.ncuc.org" target="_blank">www.ncuc.org</a><br>
<a href="mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch">william.drake@uzh.ch</a> (direct), <a href="mailto:wjdrake@gmail.com">wjdrake@gmail.com</a> (lists),<br>
<a href="http://www.williamdrake.org" target="_blank">www.williamdrake.org</a><br>
***********************************************<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>---------------------------------------------------------------<br>Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast<br>WWWhatsup NYC - <a href="http://wwwhatsup.com" target="_blank">http://wwwhatsup.com</a><br>
<a href="http://pinstand.com" target="_blank">http://pinstand.com</a> - <a href="http://punkcast.com" target="_blank">http://punkcast.com</a><br> VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - <a href="http://isoc-ny.org" target="_blank">http://isoc-ny.org</a><br>
--------------------------------------------------------------<br>-
</div>