<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Thanks, Mary for the advice, and David
      for the follow-up.<br>
      <br>
      I appreciate such orientation as I am preparing to substitute
      again for Joy at the GNSO meeting in a couple of hours.<br>
      <br>
      Any further advice from anybody?<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      Norbert<br>
      <br>
      =<br>
      <br>
      On 14 2.2013 10:32, David Cake wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:EE34B20B-AA52-4B48-9BF1-D7B95AF9D32E@difference.com.au"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=ISO-8859-1">
      <br>
      <div>
        <div>On 14/02/2013, at 9:48 AM, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:Mary.Wong@LAW.UNH.EDU">Mary.Wong@LAW.UNH.EDU</a>
          wrote:</div>
        <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div style="margin-right: 4px; font-variant: normal;
            font-weight: normal; margin-left: 4px; margin-top: 4px;
            font-family: Lucida Grande; font-size: 12pt; font-style:
            normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 1px">
            <div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px; "> <font
                size="3" face="Lucida Grande">Good to see the support
                from NCUC and NPOC members! I was on the call with Avri
                today and it was really odd. May I request our
                Councilors to make the point Avri made about maintaining
                the integrity of the PDP process during the Council call
                tomorrow?</font> </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>I
        am willing to speak during the council call to make this point.
        I strongly agree that any move to restrict IGO/INGO names at
        this point is very premature. </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span></div>
      <div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Regards</div>
      <div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>David<br>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div style="margin-right: 4px; font-variant: normal;
            font-weight: normal; margin-left: 4px; margin-top: 4px;
            font-family: Lucida Grande; font-size: 12pt; font-style:
            normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 1px">
            <br>
            <div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px; "> <font
                size="3" face="Lucida Grande">It seems to me that all
                the GNSO Council needs to say to the Board at this time
                is that the Working Group for the PDP is going strong,
                doing plenty of work and having lots of excellent
                discussions. As such, rather than act in haste/under
                pressure from the GAC/peremptorily, the Board ought to
                wait for the GNSO's PDP to run its course. The Council
                should convey to the Board its belief that the PDP WG
                will come up with a set of firm and implementable
                recommendations that will have been thoroughly discussed
                with some of the affected IGOs and INGOs, and advise the
                Board to desist till this is the case.</font> </div>
            <br>
            <div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px; "> <font
                size="3" face="Lucida Grande">Cheers</font> </div>
            <div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px; "> <font
                size="3" face="Lucida Grande">Mary</font><br>
              <br>
              <font style="font-size: 12pt" face="Lucida Grande"><br>
                Mary W S Wong
                <br>
                Professor of Law
                <br>
                Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
                <br>
                Chair, Graduate IP Programs
                <br>
                UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
                <br>
                Two White Street
                <br>
                Concord, NH 03301
                <br>
                USA
                <br>
                Email: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:mary.wong@law.unh.edu">mary.wong@law.unh.edu</a>
                <br>
                Phone: 1-603-513-5143
                <br>
                Webpage: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php">http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
                </a><br>
                Selected writings available on the Social Science
                Research Network (SSRN) at: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://ssrn.com/author=437584">http://ssrn.com/author=437584</a> 
                <br>
                <br>
                <br>
              </font>>>> </div>
            <table style="margin-right: 0; margin-left: 15px;
              margin-top: 0; font-size: 1em; margin-bottom: 0"
              bgcolor="#f3f3f3" border="0">
              <tbody>
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <div style="padding-left: 7px; border-left: solid
                      1px #050505">
                      <table style="font-variant: normal; font-weight:
                        normal; font-family: Lucida Grande; font-size:
                        12pt; font-style: normal; line-height: normal"
                        bgcolor="#f3f3f3">
                        <tbody>
                          <tr valign="top">
                            <td>
                              <div style="margin-bottom: 0px;
                                margin-top: 0px; "> <b>From: </b> </div>
                            </td>
                            <td>
                              <div style="margin-bottom: 0px;
                                margin-top: 0px; "> "klaus.stoll" <<a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  href="mailto:klaus.stoll@CHASQUINET.ORG">klaus.stoll@CHASQUINET.ORG</a>>
                              </div>
                            </td>
                          </tr>
                          <tr valign="top">
                            <td>
                              <div style="margin-bottom: 0px;
                                margin-top: 0px; "> <b>To:</b> </div>
                            </td>
                            <td>
                              <div style="margin-bottom: 0px;
                                margin-top: 0px; "> <<a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a>>
                              </div>
                            </td>
                          </tr>
                          <tr valign="top">
                            <td>
                              <div style="margin-bottom: 0px;
                                margin-top: 0px; "> <b>Date: </b> </div>
                            </td>
                            <td>
                              <div style="margin-bottom: 0px;
                                margin-top: 0px; "> 2/13/2013 5:46 PM </div>
                            </td>
                          </tr>
                          <tr valign="top">
                            <td>
                              <div style="margin-bottom: 0px;
                                margin-top: 0px; "> <b>Subject: </b> </div>
                            </td>
                            <td>
                              <div style="margin-bottom: 0px;
                                margin-top: 0px; "> Re: [NCSG-Discuss]
                                The Board, IGO entitlement to special
                                protections and 28 Feb </div>
                            </td>
                          </tr>
                        </tbody>
                      </table>
                      <div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px; ">
                        Dear Avr<br>
                        <br>
                        Greetings. If there is any way I can help to
                        draft a statement to the board<br>
                        before the 28th please let me know.<br>
                        <br>
                        Yours<br>
                        <br>
                        Klais<br>
                        <br>
                        -----Original Message-----<br>
                        From: Carl Smith<br>
                        Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 11:23 PM<br>
                        To: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a><br>
                        Subject: Re: The Board, IGO entitlement to
                        special protections and 28 Feb<br>
                        <br>
                        Thanks Avri,<br>
                        <br>
                        This is disturbing news.  Hope you can get a
                        quorum of the brainy people<br>
                        in the group to create a sound response.  I wish
                        I was thirty years<br>
                        younger.  Looking forward to discussions.<br>
                        <br>
                        Best<br>
                        <br>
                        Lou<br>
                        <br>
                        On 2/13/2013 2:44 PM, Avri Doria wrote:<br>
                        > Hi,<br>
                        ><br>
                        > During yesterday's meeting we discussed the
                        irem on the g-cpuncil agenda<br>
                        > pertaining to special protection for IGO,
                        given the deadline of 28 Feb for<br>
                        > Board consideration of yet another
                        preemptive assignment of an entitlement<br>
                        > to protection, as was done for the RCRC and
                        IOC.<br>
                        ><br>
                        > It appears that Thomas is planning to
                        suggest that the GNSO support a<br>
                        > decision by the Board granting entitlements
                        to IGO names as suggest by the<br>
                        > GAC.<br>
                        ><br>
                        > Unfortunately Evan and I were the only one
                        to speak out agains the board<br>
                        > making the decisions at this time because:<br>
                        ><br>
                        > A. it is not the same as the RCRC/IOC case
                        since a PDP is ongoing and this<br>
                        > prejudices that work<br>
                        > B.  It is not an emergency<br>
                        ><br>
                        > But Alan, the IOC and the Greg Shatan (IGO)
                        spoke in favor of getting this<br>
                        > new entitlement as soon as possible, so the
                        recommendation from Thomas<br>
                        > will be for the creation of the new
                        entitlements, once again preempting<br>
                        > the rule of PDP.<br>
                        ><br>
                        > Note: Alan also suggested that if we don't
                        like this or the previous<br>
                        > RCRC/IOC entitlement decision, we should
                        file a reconsideration.  For<br>
                        > once, I agree with him.<br>
                        ><br>
                        > I would also note that no one from the RrSg
                        or RySG ventured an opinion.<br>
                        ><br>
                        > At this point we have, perhaps, until 28
                        Feb to file a statement rejecting<br>
                        > yet another attack against the Rule of
                        PDP.  Should we be working on one?<br>
                        ><br>
                        > Also should we file a request for
                        reconsideration of the previous decision<br>
                        > on RCRC and IOC?  I am less sure about this
                        because since there was no PDP<br>
                        > in process at the time.  While the best
                        thing for the Board to have done<br>
                        > would have been to request a PDP, there was
                        no rule that barred them from<br>
                        > the making a preemptive decision as they
                        did.  Yes it is against the pubic<br>
                        > interest in that it erodes the confidence
                        in the ICANN and its processes,<br>
                        > but it is not prevented by the bylaws.<br>
                        ><br>
                        > avri<br>
                        ><br>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>