<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">A huge smile for Magaly who keeps
everything in perspective... and keeps everyone smiling!<br>
Tx Magaly :-),<br>
Kathy<br>
<br>
:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAFayLJs8AqQCgwoHeVVxAny3OumN=v3G3_34fsLNBxdX8zYThw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
People, please be relax... it is carnival and the Pope has
resigned! Let's celebrate!
<div>Websites, wikis etc. are always a working in progress... I am
happy that there are vonlunteers and icann staff working on that
:-)<br>
<div>Magaly<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Avri
Doria <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:avri@acm.org" target="_blank">avri@acm.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
cheers<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On 11 Feb 2013, at 00:03, Edward Morris wrote:<br>
<br>
><br>
> Thanks for clarifying that Avri.<br>
><br>
> I assume this was informal?<br>
<br>
</div>
There was not vote on the issue if that is what you mean
by formal.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
><br>
> One of the best parts of transparency is everyone
knows who made what decision. That way displeasure or
approval are directed at the proper parties.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>
It was done on the NCSG-PC list, which has an open archive
<<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/"
target="_blank">http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/</a>>
which everyone in the world is free to peruse any time
they wish.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
> At NCUC we now know we can't count on the stability
of our confluence presence should our NCSG colleagues
have a change of heart. As such, we can act
appropriately in redesigning our web presence.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>
As far as i know, the NCUC has chosen NOT to use the
confluence wiki, whereas NCSG has, and it looks like NPOC
has as well.<br>
<br>
Other then making any references to the NCUC that are
appropriate, I see NO connection between the NCSG wiki and
the NCUC wiki.<br>
<br>
Certainly I think it will be useful to track any
statements that might come out of the NCUC or NPOC on the
NCSG wiki and thus have attempted to take that into the
account in the tables I am proposing for tracking the
NCSG-PC's work.<br>
<br>
But the NCUC should feel free to do whatever it pleases in
terms of establishing its own wiki. I do not see why NCSG
wiki decisions have any bearing on that at all.<br>
<br>
Also in terms of transparency, I think saying "look, look,
what I have done" covers that at least to some extent. As
for accountability, the NCUC-EC that appointed me to the
NCSG-PC, can withdraw my appointment anytime it is
displeased. I think that is how accountability in the
NCSG works: you fire the bums. As one of the NCUC
Executives, it is in your power to initiate that process
should you feel I have transgressed against transparency
or accountability.<br>
<br>
BTW, while we are asking questions based on my request for
WG participation info, are you participating in Working
Groups, the question that started this entire thread? One
of the interesting things some of are discovering is that
in the GNSO, in general, we have more people in
Constituency and Stakeholder boss roles than we have in
Working Groups - sort of an inverse pyramidical notion of
bottom-up. In addition to finding out where NCSG people
are working on policy, i.e. the working groups, I am
curious as to what the NCSG ratio of bosses:workers is.<br>
<br>
thanks<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><br>
avri<br>
<br>
</span></blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>