<p>Regards this, I deliberately chose to make up my mind on and deal with *all* persons from the neck upwards. Pleased that it saved me a reasonable number of illogical arguments.<br></p>
<p>--sent from a handheld-- excuse brevity and any typos--</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 31, 2013 7:24 PM, "Carl Smith" <<a href="mailto:lectriclou@hotmail.com">lectriclou@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div>Thanks David,<br>
<br>
I have no problem with the geographic point, but If our best
choice is a woman then what is the problem? To me, the one of
whom we have the greatest confidence is who will serve our joint
interests best. I look to the minds and hearts of those I
support. There are still bigots in the world and surely that will
continue to need addressing. Though often hidden from view. If
the females of the world are to be our leaders because they have
the right stuff, we are better for that. Are men afraid of
loosing their machismo? <br>
<br>
Sorry for the rant, but I see this gender thing as demeaning to
those who have worked to get to the position which they have
rightfully earned.<br>
<br>
Respectfully,<br>
<br>
Lou<br>
<br>
On 1/30/2013 12:37 PM, David Cake wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
FWIW, only one GNSO endorsed candidate was required to meet gender
diversity requirements, and both applicants from NCSG were women,
so NCSG was inevitably going to meet the gender diversity
requirements for the council, and so gender diversity was not at
issue for this selection. One applicant from the Registries was a
woman, but they did not choose to advance them as a candidate for
endorsements.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The diversity requirement that is relevant to the council
endorsement decision was geographical diversity - we have ended
up with four GNSO endorsed candidates from North America. There
was an option for the council to endorse two extra candidates to
satisfy geographical diversity requirements, one each from NCSG
(Marie-Laure) and CSG, but the contracted parties did not vote
for it. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards</div>
<div><span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>David</div>
<div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>On 30/01/2013, at 8:38 AM, Carl Smith <<a href="mailto:lectriclou@HOTMAIL.COM" target="_blank">lectriclou@HOTMAIL.COM</a>>
wrote:</div>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div>Thanks Bill,<br>
<br>
Is this a solution looking for a problem or is there a
problem of which I am unaware. Seems to me, we have
tried to get the representation with confidence in
mind. I know we talked about diversity with
agreement. But if our best representation is not of
the right sex......? I for one just want our
consensus to be aggressively pursued by whom ever we
feel most confident. I never got the impression any
of us was a bigot. We have a liberty minded group, I
believe.<br>
<br>
Respectfully,<br>
<br>
Lou<br>
<br>
On 1/29/2013 9:51 AM, William Drake wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
Hi Alain
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The process agreed agreed June 2010 <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/other/aoc-reviews" target="_blank">http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/other/aoc-reviews</a>
is that</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>"If the list does not meet the above mentioned
diversity objectives, the Council as a whole may
choose to endorse up to two additional candidates
from the applicant pool who would help to give
the list of GNSO nominees the desired balance. In
this case, the Council would hold a vote during its
teleconference, with sixty percent support of
both houses represented in the Council being
required for endorsement. If no candidate
obtains that level of support, the list of
endorsements obtained via the bottom-up process
of stakeholder group nominations will be deemed
final and forwarded to ICANN."</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>So the additional nominees would be of the GNSO
generally, not of the houses or SGs. The CPH stance
was thus technically fine, just ill-considered.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Bill<br>
<br>
<div>
<div>On Jan 28, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Alain Berranger
<<a href="mailto:alain.berranger@gmail.com" target="_blank">alain.berranger@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:</div>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Thanks Robin,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Did not know it was an option for
contracting parties to block non-contracted
parties additional candidates. Is that the
right interpretation? Did they also blocked
additional candidates that would have
added gender diversity?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Alain<span></span><br>
<br>
On Monday, January 28, 2013, Robin Gross
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"> I am told
that the contracting parties blocked all
additional candidates that would have
added some geo diversity to the group.
That part is disappointing.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>Begin forwarded message:</div>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><font style="font:12.0px Helvetica" size="3" face="Helvetica"><b>From:
</b></font><font style="font:12.0px Helvetica" size="3" face="Helvetica">"Jonathan
Robinson" <<a>jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com</a>></font></div>
<div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><font style="font:12.0px Helvetica" size="3" face="Helvetica"><b>Date:
</b></font><font style="font:12.0px Helvetica" size="3" face="Helvetica">January
27, 2013 12:49:41 PM PST</font></div>
<div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><font style="font:12.0px Helvetica" size="3" face="Helvetica"><b>To:
</b></font><font style="font:12.0px Helvetica" size="3" face="Helvetica">"Steve
Crocker" <<a>steve@shinkuro.com</a>>,
<<a>Heather.Dryden@ic.gc.ca</a>>,
<<a>jeannie.ellers@icann.org</a>></font></div>
<div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><font style="font:12.0px Helvetica" size="3" face="Helvetica"><b>Cc:
</b></font><font style="font:12.0px Helvetica" size="3" face="Helvetica"><<a>council@gnso.icann.org</a>>,
<<a>marilynscade@hotmail.com</a>>,
<<a>krosette@cov.com</a>>,
"tony holmes" <<a>tonyarholmes@btinternet.com</a>>,
"William Drake" <<a>william.drake@uzh.ch</a>>,
<<a>alain.berranger@gmail.com</a>>,
<<a>robin@ipjustice.org</a>>,
"'KEITH DRAZEK'" <<a>kdrazek@Verisign.com</a>>,
"Matt Serlin" <<a>matt.serlin@markmonitor.com</a>></font></div>
<div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><font style="font:12.0px Helvetica" size="3" face="Helvetica"><b>Subject:
</b></font><font style="font:12.0px Helvetica" size="3" face="Helvetica"><b>GNSO
applicants to the ATRT2 team</b></font></div>
<div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;min-height:14px"><br>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear Steve,
Dear Heather,</p>
<div> <br>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Please see
attached letter regarding
appointment of applicants
arising from within the GNSO
to the ATRT2 team.</p>
<div> <br>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank-you
for giving this matter your
attention.</p>
<div> <br>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best
wishes,</p>
<div> <br>
</div>
<div> <br>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Jonathan</p>
<div style="border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">
<div><span> </span><br>
</div>
</div>
<div><span> </span><br>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Jonathan
Robinson</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Chair</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>ICANN
GNSO Council</span></p>
<div><span> </span><br>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><a>jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>skype:
jonathan.m.r</span></p>
<div> <br>
</div>
<div> <br>
</div>
<div> <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
<div>Member, Board of Directors, CECI, <a href="http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/" target="_blank">http://www.ceci.ca</a><br>
<div>Executive-in-residence, Schulich School
of Business, <a href="http://www.schulich.yorku.ca/" target="_blank">www.schulich.yorku.ca</a></div>
<div>Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership
Foundation, <a href="http://www.gkpfoundation.org/" target="_blank">www.gkpfoundation.org</a></div>
<div>NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation,
<font color="#0a246a" face="'Times New
Roman', Times, serif"><a href="http://www.chasquinet.org/" target="_blank">www.chasquinet.org</a></font><br>
Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, <a href="http://npoc.org/" target="_blank">http://npoc.org/</a><br>
O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824<br>
Skype: alain.berranger<br>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ</div>
<div>Ce courriel est confidentiel et est à
l’usage exclusif du destinataire ci-dessus.
Toute personne qui lit le présent message
sans en être le destinataire, ou
l’employé(e) ou la personne responsable de
le remettre au destinataire, est par les
présentes avisée qu’il lui est strictement
interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer,
de le modifier ou de le reproduire, en tout
ou en partie . Si le destinataire ne peut
être joint ou si ce document vous a été
communiqué par erreur, veuillez nous en
informer sur le champ et détruire ce
courriel et toute copie de celui-ci. Merci
de votre coopération.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>CONFIDENTIALITY MESSAGE</div>
<div>This e-mail message is confidential and
is intended for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Please note that, should this
message be read by anyone other than the
addressee, his or her employee or the person
responsible for forwarding it to the
addressee, it is strictly prohibited to
disclose, distribute, modify or reproduce
the contents of this message, in whole or in
part. If the addressee cannot be reached or
if you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify us immediately and delete this
e-mail and destroy all copies. Thank you for
your cooperation.</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div>