<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body ><div>I agree as well.</div><div><br></div><div>--c.a.</div><div><br></div><div><div style="font-size:100%">Carlos A. Afonso</div></div> <br>Milton L Mueller <mueller@SYR.EDU> escreveu:<br>I agree with Avri here. The nxt NCSG EC meeting we can take this up<br><br>> -----Original Message-----<br>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf<br>> Of Avri Doria<br>> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 11:48 AM<br>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<br>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] (Re) Introduction<br>> <br>> On 24 Oct 2012, at 02:34, William Drake wrote:<br>> <br>> > While I conversely have stepped down after serving 4 years as NCUC liaison<br>> to ALAC, so we'll need to fill that slot after our election.<br>> <br>> <br>> While obviously both NCUC and NPOC can send their own liaisons to ALAC,<br>> assuming ALAC accepts them, I think it makes more sense for there to be a<br>> NCSG Liaison. The NCUC liaison is a hangover from the days before the NCSG<br>> was created. At this point, I think the more important liaison is one from<br>> NCSG.<br>> <br>> avri<br></body>