<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Something like the berkman study would help if there would be lots
    of litterature to classify and assess. But I suspect there will be
    scarce learned-opinions on the matter as of yet. Which means that
    the contracted learned opinion will be among the very first ones,
    and i do not think this would be wise.<br>
    <br>
    The only way this would be wise would be a consortium of legal
    scholars giving all possible interpretation angles, within a wide
    mandate to do so. Folks let's not forget that the legal world is not
    laid on a presumed pre-political or pre-social matrix and that in
    most circumstances, it can just not be *found*, it has to be
    interpreted. <br>
    <br>
    Furthermore, the determination of the interrelation between ICANN
    and different levels of legal juridiction is very much a political
    determination. Pretending that it could be legally *found* by a
    contractor is just another political way of trying to assert it. The
    fact that it is a political way that denies its political nature
    doesn't change its nature in the least bit. The political arena
    where the political games become played by pretending that the
    political arena doesn't exist is a sorry one indeed. <br>
    <br>
    I'm unsure on which other options I would like to pursue. Maybe
    think about them all still ;(<br>
    <br>
    Nicolas<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19/07/2012 9:28 PM, Alain Berranger
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CANgs+StrxHAaoagzZs5cA+Fn76cN9saMToRiHtUMQD5WmMTQrA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">Excellent suggestion!
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Alain<br>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Adam
          Peake <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:ajp@glocom.ac.jp" target="_blank">ajp@glocom.ac.jp</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">How about
            a variation of 5, contract with<br>
            <br>
            international law firm "to conduct a legal analysis to
            substantiate/verify whether there is clear evidence of
            treaty law and/or statutes that would require registries and
            registrars to protect IOC and RCRC names by law."<br>
            <br>
            Not ICANN legal counsel.  Tender for an international legal
            firm (consortium of legal scholars?) to conduct analysis
            (there's about $357m in the TLD moneybox)<br>
            <br>
            Adam
            <div class="im"><br>
              <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              At 11:23 AM -0400 7/18/12, Avri Doria wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              Begin forwarded message:<br>
              <br>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                From: Brian Peck <<mailto:<a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:brian.peck@icann.org" target="_blank">brian.peck@icann.org</a>><a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:brian.peck@icann.org" target="_blank">brian.peck@icann.org</a>>
                <div class="im"><br>
                  <br>
                  Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] List of possible approaches
                  for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS<br>
                  <br>
                  Date: 18 July 2012 11:08:58 EDT<br>
                  <br>
                </div>
                To: "<mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org</a>><a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org</a>"
                <<mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org</a>><a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org</a>>
                <div class="im">
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in
                  new gTLDS<br>
                </div>
                <div class="im">
                  In response to the request during the last RC/IOC DT
                  call, please find below a list of possible approaches
                  that have been proposed to date for moving forward in
                  responding to the GAC proposal to protect the RCRC and
                  IOC names at the second level in new gTLDS:<br>
                  <br>
                </div>
                1.      Maintain the status quo and not provide any new
                special protections for the RCRC/IOC names (i.e., no
                changes to the current schedule of second-level reserved
                names in the new gTLD Registry Agreement).<br>
                2.      Develop recommendations to implement the GAC
                proposal such as extending protection to all or a subset
                of RCRC names only, all or a subset of IOC names only
                or, to both sets of each organization&sup1;s names.<br>
                3.      Consider the proposal to not provide any new
                protections now and wait to see if any additional
                protections may be necessary after the delegation of the
                first round new gTLD strings and/or consider lowering
                costs for each organization to utilize RPMs ( i.e.,
                Thomas Rickert&sup1;s proposal)<br>
                4.      Consider possible additional protections for the
                RCRC/IOC as part of a broader PDP on the protection of
                names for international organizations<br>
                5.      Ask ICANN General Counsel&sup1;s office to conduct a
                legal analysis to substantiate/verify whether there is
                clear evidence of treaty law and/or statutes that would
                require registries and registrars to protect IOC and
                RCRC names by law.  
                <div class="im">
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  Please let us know if you have any questions or need
                  anything further at this time.  Thanks.<br>
                  <br>
                  Best Regards,<br>
                  <br>
                  Brian<br>
                  <br>
                  Brian Peck<br>
                  Policy Director<br>
                  ICANN<br>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
            </blockquote>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
        <br clear="all">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        -- <br>
        Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
        <div>Member, Board of Directors, CECI, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/"
            target="_blank">http://www.ceci.ca</a><br>
          <div>Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, <a
              moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.schulich.yorku.ca"
              target="_blank">www.schulich.yorku.ca</a></div>
          <div>Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, <a
              moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.gkpfoundation.org"
              target="_blank">www.gkpfoundation.org</a></div>
          <div>NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, <font
              color="#0a246a" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><a
                moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.chasquinet.org"
                target="_blank">www.chasquinet.org</a></font><br>
            Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="http://npoc.org/" target="_blank">http://npoc.org/</a><br>
            O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824<br>
            Skype: alain.berranger<br>
          </div>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>