<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">I lend my support to options 3 and 4.<br/><br/>Nicolas<br/><div>Please excuse my mobile brevity.</div><hr/><div><b>From: </b> Robin Gross <robin@IPJUSTICE.ORG>
</div><div><b>Sender: </b> NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
</div><div><b>Date: </b>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:02:06 -0700</div><div><b>To: </b><NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU></div><div><b>ReplyTo: </b> Robin Gross <robin@IPJUSTICE.ORG>
</div><div><b>Subject: </b>Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Opinions? Fwd: [] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS</div><div><br/></div>Hi everyone,<div><br></div><div>Just a quick reminder to please send your individual feedback on the below issue to Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@ACM.ORG">avri@ACM.ORG</a>> asap so she can feed it back to the drafting team. Or (of course) continue to post your individual comments to this list and she'll see them here and we can continue a lively discussion on the issue.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Robin</div><div><br><div><div>On Jul 18, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Avri Doria wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><br><div>Begin forwarded message:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;"><span style="font-family:'Helvetica'; font-size:medium; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);"><b>From: </b></span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica'; font-size:medium;">Brian Peck <<a href="mailto:brian.peck@icann.org">brian.peck@icann.org</a>><br></span></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;"><span style="font-family:'Helvetica'; font-size:medium; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);"><b>Subject: </b></span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica'; font-size:medium;"><b>[gnso-iocrc-dt] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS</b><br></span></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;"><span style="font-family:'Helvetica'; font-size:medium; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);"><b>Date: </b></span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica'; font-size:medium;">18 July 2012 11:08:58 EDT<br></span></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;"><span style="font-family:'Helvetica'; font-size:medium; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);"><b>To: </b></span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica'; font-size:medium;">"<a href="mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org">gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org">gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org</a>><br></span></div><br>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252"><title>List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS</title>
<div>
<font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt">In response to the request during the last RC/IOC DT call, please find below a list of possible approaches that have been proposed to date for moving forward in responding to the GAC proposal to protect the RCRC and IOC names at the second level in new gTLDS:<br>
<br>
</span></font><ol><li><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt">Maintain the status quo and not provide any new special protections for the RCRC/IOC names (i.e., no changes to the current schedule of second-level reserved names in the new gTLD Registry Agreement).
</span></font></li><li><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt">Develop recommendations to implement the GAC proposal such as extending protection to all or a subset of RCRC names only, all or a subset of IOC names only or, to both sets of each organization’s names.
</span></font></li><li><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt">Consider the proposal to not provide any new protections now and wait to see if any additional protections may be necessary after the delegation of the first round new gTLD strings and/or consider lowering costs for each organization to utilize RPMs ( i.e., Thomas Rickert’s proposal)
</span></font></li><li><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt">Consider possible additional protections for the RCRC/IOC as part of a broader PDP on the protection of names for international organizations
</span></font></li><li><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt">Ask ICANN General Counsel’s office to conduct a legal analysis to substantiate/verify whether there is clear evidence of treaty law and/or statutes that would require registries and registrars to protect IOC and RCRC names by law. <br>
</span></font></li></ol><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt"><br>
Please let us know if you have any questions or need anything further at this time. Thanks.<br>
<br>
Best Regards,<br>
<br>
Brian <br>
<br>
Brian Peck<br>
Policy Director<br>
ICANN </span></font>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>