more Olympic rights fun <<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/apr/13/olympics-2012-branding-police-sponsors">http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/apr/13/olympics-2012-branding-police-sponsors</a>>  Bit off topic.  <span></span><div>
<br></div><div>Adam</div><div><br></div><div><br><br>On Monday, April 16, 2012, Avri Doria  wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
What's to discuss?<br>
We presented arguments.<br>
And they were heard.<br>
<br>
Avri<br>
<br>
Milton L Mueller <<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'mueller@SYR.EDU')">mueller@SYR.EDU</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
>I am surprised there is not more discussion of these resolutions on<br>
>this list.<br>
>The good news is that in both cases, the board’s action coincides with<br>
>NCSG positions, and in the case of the second resolution, I think our<br>
>work played a role in making the decision.<br>
><br>
>My analysis of the board resolutions here:<br>
><a href="http://www.internetgovernance.org/2012/04/14/when-no-action-is-the-wisest-action-icann-does-good/" target="_blank">http://www.internetgovernance.org/2012/04/14/when-no-action-is-the-wisest-action-icann-does-good/</a><br>

><br>
><br>
</blockquote></div>