I personally have no expectation on this: as Klaus says, the gates are already open.<div><br></div><div>Why the UN and 10 more. Why not 100 more? or 1024 more? </div><div><br></div><div>The process is contaminated, and this is exactly what any wise person would avoid.</div>
<div><br></div><div>BR</div><div>NG<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 7 April 2012 17:36, klaus.stoll <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:klaus.stoll@chasquinet.org">klaus.stoll@chasquinet.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="WORD-WRAP:break-word" dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Calibri'">
<div>Dear Friends</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Greetings. I think we need to limit the possibility to an absolute minimum,
(UN + 10 max), IF ANY !, everything else will as Avri says open up the flood
gates and make the whole gTLD system unmanageable because there will we hundreds
if not thousands of exceptions and an equal number of legal actions for those
who think they deserve them.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Yours</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Klaus</div>
<div style="font-size:small;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:'Calibri';display:inline;font-weight:normal">
<div style="FONT:10pt tahoma">
<div> </div>
<div style="BACKGROUND:#f5f5f5">
<div><b>From:</b> <a title="robin@IPJUSTICE.ORG" href="mailto:robin@IPJUSTICE.ORG" target="_blank">Robin Gross</a> </div>
<div><b>Sent:</b> Saturday, April 07, 2012 5:51 PM</div>
<div><b>To:</b> <a title="NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" target="_blank">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a>
</div>
<div><b>Subject:</b> Re: Update on IOC/RC issue: motion proposed by NCSG for
PDP</div></div></div>
<div> </div></div><div><div class="h5">
<div style="font-size:small;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:'Calibri';display:inline;font-weight:normal">Thanks.
I thought we were going to add "IF ANY" to the clause asking about what other
orgs deserve such rights? I worry that we are inviting a flood gate of
requests for privileges by assuming there will be others (rather than ask the
question IF there should be others first).
<div> </div>
<div>Robin<br>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div>On Apr 6, 2012, at 10:31 AM, <a href="mailto:Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu" target="_blank">Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu</a> wrote:</div><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div style="MARGIN:4px 4px 1px;FONT:10pt tahoma">
<div>Hello everyone,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The NCSG Policy Committee agreed that, in view of the passage of the
motion which adopted the IOC-RC Drafting Team's recommendations for
first-round protections for the IOC and RC, the GNSO should consider
additional protections - including any that might apply to other international
governmental organizations (IGOs) who have requested similar protections -
through a full Policy Development Process (PDP) rather than through an ad-hoc
drafting team.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Accordingly, we proposed a motion that will be discussed at the upcoming
GNSO Council meeting next week on Thursday 12 April. Coincidentally, a similar
(but not identical) motion was also proposed by Thomas Rickert, the Nominating
Committee appointee to the Contracted Parties' House. Both motions can be
viewed at <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+12+April+2012" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+12+April+2012</a>.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Between now and the Council meeting, we'll be discussing with Thomas ways
to combine both motions so that the Council need only vote on one unified
motion. Early indications are that the concept is acceptable to some of the
other Council members, so I'm hopeful that if we can successfully fuse both
motions, there is a fair chance of its passage.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Cheers</div>
<div>Mary</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong><font color="#800080">Mary W S Wong</font></strong></div>
<div><em>Professor of Law</em></div>
<div><em>Chair, Graduate IP Programs</em></div>
<div><em>Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP</em></div>
<address>UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW</address>
<address>Two White Street</address>
<address>Concord, NH 03301</address>
<address>USA</address>
<address>Email: <a href="mailto:mary.wong@law.unh.edu" target="_blank">mary.wong@law.unh.edu</a></address>
<address>Phone: 1-603-513-5143</address>
<address>Webpage: <a href="http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php" target="_blank">http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php</a></address>
<address>Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
(SSRN) at: <a href="http://ssrn.com/author=437584" target="_blank">http://ssrn.com/author=437584</a></address></div></blockquote></div>
<div> </div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>