<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-7"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
I agree with T Litt's sentiments. The objective to me is also equal
protection. Especially for underfunded endeavors by small groups
and individuals. Well funded organizations are already in a better
position to defend their interests. We should resist any attempts
by any group to acquire special or unreasonable protections which do
not apply to similar groups or categories of content. <br>
<br>
On 2/3/2012 7:30 AM, Timothe Litt wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:67B8313E543145D1973BE9495539199C@sb.litts.net"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-7"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19170">
<!--[if !mso]>
<STYLE>v\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
o\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
w\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
.shape {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
</STYLE>
<![endif]-->
<style>@font-face {
font-family: Wingdings;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Wingdings;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Cambria;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Calibri;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Bodoni MT Condensed;
}
@page WordSection1 {size: 612.0pt 792.0pt; margin: 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; }
P.MsoNormal {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; FONT-SIZE: 11pt
}
LI.MsoNormal {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; FONT-SIZE: 11pt
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; FONT-SIZE: 11pt
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.EmailStyle17 {
FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; COLOR: windowtext; mso-style-type: personal
}
SPAN.EmailStyle18 {
FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-FAMILY: "Cambria","serif"; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; mso-style-type: personal-reply
}
.MsoChpDefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-style-type: export-only
}
DIV.WordSection1 {
page: WordSection1
}
</style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial"
size="2"><span class="224170011-03022012">While I agree with
the sentiment that the IRC has a marginally better claim to
"protection" than the IOC, I oppose special protection for
both.</span></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial"
size="2"><span class="224170011-03022012"></span></font> </div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial"
size="2"><span class="224170011-03022012">The existing rules
are supposed to provide a level and fair playing field for
all domain name registrants. To the extent that they don't,
modifications to the rules should be made to benefit all
registrants - not an especially well connected few.</span></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial"
size="2"><span class="224170011-03022012"></span></font> </div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial"
size="2"><span class="224170011-03022012">The primary problem
that I hear from these two is the expense of having to
defend their name(s) in multiple name spaces against fraud.
I have limited sympathy. As an individual, I do not have an
institutional law department. I don't have the
infrastructure to raise funds from a generous public to
consult with an attorney for one hour - much less to have
representation on K street in DC. These organizations do.
Certainly they (and I) would prefer that the funds they
raise for their worthy causes go to directly support their
work - not to fight (potential and real) fraud committed in
their name, trademark infringement and other criminal and/or
unsavory acts.</span></font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span class="224170011-03022012"><font color="#0000ff"
face="Arial" size="2">But I have the same risks (save
trademark, which I can't get since I'm not engaged in
commerce.) As do many other worthy non-commercial
enterprises. And many commercial enterprises - most of
which have smaller revenues than either the IOC or the IRC.
Like the 1-person barbershop owned by Henry Ford? (Of
course, not *the* Henry Ford...) Why should any of these
have to pay more to mitigate/defend against these risks than
these two? </font></span></div>
<div><span class="224170011-03022012"></span> </div>
<div><span class="224170011-03022012"><font color="#0000ff"
face="Arial" size="2">Since most of the problems involve
criminal acts, and we routinely hear about how law
enforcement needs more access to private information and
more control over the DNS to protect us: shouldn't the
demand be for effective law enforcement for all? As for the
non-criminal problems (e.g. registering related names such
as help-<tomorrows-disaster>.org and
games-in-<tbd-city>-2038.com thru
games-in-<another-city>.4113.com) - why should these
two organizations be immunized from the predation of the
cybersquatters while the rest of us have to deal with them?
Why should equally valuable charities (e.g. United Way) have
higher costs? Why should individuals/small businesses?</font></span></div>
<div><span class="224170011-03022012"></span><span
class="224170011-03022012"></span> </div>
<div><span class="224170011-03022012"><font color="#0000ff"
face="Arial" size="2">If the system we have is insufficient
or too expensive to protect the rights of the small domain
name holder (which I suspect is, or will be the majority),
it needs to be fixed in a way that benefits them (us) as
well as the large institutions. </font></span></div>
<div><span class="224170011-03022012"></span> </div>
<div><span class="224170011-03022012"><font color="#0000ff"
face="Arial" size="2">The IOC and the IRC would get a more
support and assistance from me (and I expect this community)
if they contributed to a reform effort that addressed the
problems of all domain name registrants, rather than this
proposal to carve out special exceptions for themselves and
leave the rest of us to fend for ourselves. Especially
since once they have their "special protection", I don't
see why they would use their resources to file amicus briefs
in our cases or otherwise significantly assist us...</font></span></div>
<div><span class="224170011-03022012"></span> </div>
<div><span class="224170011-03022012"><font color="#0000ff"
face="Arial" size="2">Like any community, the internet works
best when we all work together. </font></span></div>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format --><br>
<p><font size="2"><!-- Converted from text/plain format --></font></p>
<font size="2">
</font>
<p><font size="2"><font size="2">Timothe Litt<br>
ACM Distinguished Engineer<br>
---------------------------------------------------------<br>
This communication may not represent the ACM or my
employer's views,<br>
if any, on the matters discussed.<br>
<br>
</font></font>
</p>
<hr tabindex="-1">
<font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>From:</b> NCSG-Discuss
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU">mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Konstantinos
Komaitis<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, February 02, 2012 04:49<br>
<b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [NCSG-Discuss] FW: Questions/Options for
Protection of IOC/Red Cross Names at Top Level<br>
</font><br>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Cambria','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d">Dear all,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Cambria','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Cambria','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d">As you know, a policy
group has been created to discuss the GAC¢s request for
special protection of the Olympic and Red Cross marks and
their variations. The group came up with a set of questions
and possible options that will be discussing in next week¢s
call. Please note that at this stage discussions are
focusing only at the top level and not the second. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Cambria','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Cambria','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d">Can I please ask for your
feedback on these possible recommendations? You all know
where I stand on this issue (especially with regards to the
OLYMPIC mark) and I am very annoyed that the Greek GAC rep
is not with me on this </span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
Wingdings; COLOR: #1f497d">L</span><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Cambria','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Cambria','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Cambria','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d">Anyway, the next call is
scheduled for next Wednesday and Jeff, chairing the group,
is asking for any comments by Sunday. Apologies for sending
this quite late.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Cambria','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Cambria','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d">Thanks<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Cambria','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Cambria','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d">KK<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Cambria','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Bodoni MT
Condensed','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">Dr.
Konstantinos Komaitis,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Bodoni MT
Condensed','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Bodoni MT
Condensed','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">Senior
Lecturer,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Bodoni MT
Condensed','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">Director
of Postgraduate Instructional Courses<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Bodoni MT
Condensed','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">Director
of LLM Information Technology and Telecommunications Law<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Bodoni MT
Condensed','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">University
of Strathclyde,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Bodoni MT
Condensed','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">The
Law School,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Bodoni MT
Condensed','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">Graham
Hills building, <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Bodoni MT
Condensed','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">50
George Street, Glasgow G1 1BA <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Bodoni MT
Condensed','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">UK<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Bodoni MT
Condensed','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">tel:
+44 (0)141 548 4306<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Bodoni MT
Condensed','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765">http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765</a></span><span
style="COLOR: #1f497d"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Bodoni MT
Condensed','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">Selected
publications: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038">http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Bodoni MT
Condensed','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">Website:
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.komaitis.org">www.komaitis.org</a></span><span
style="COLOR: #1f497d"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Cambria','serif'; COLOR: #1f497d"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium
none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0cm; PADDING-LEFT: 0cm; PADDING-RIGHT:
0cm; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium
none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Tahoma','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE:
10pt" lang="EN-US"> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org">owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org">mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of
</b>Neuman, Jeff<br>
<b>Sent:</b> ÐÝìðôç, 26 Éáíïõáñßïõ 2012 1:48 ðì<br>
<b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org">gnso-iocrc-dt@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [gnso-iocrc-dt] Questions/Options for
Protection of IOC/Red Cross Names at Top Level<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 12pt" class="MsoNormal"><span
lang="EN-US">All,<br>
<br>
Thanks for the very productive session today during our
call. Given the feedback on the call, we have revised the
questions and options for protecting the IOC and Red
Cross/Red Crescent names at the top level. On the call, we
discussed a fifth option for Question 1 which included the
notion of a letter of non-objection from either the IOC/Red
Cross or a relevant governmental entity (See options 5(a)
and 5(b) below). It also occurred to me after the call that
there is a sixth option, which enable an appeal process
(like option 4) for entities that apply for strings that are
found to have string similarity, but are unable to secure a
letter of non-objection from the IOC/Red Cross or the
relevant governmental authority, but still nonetheless have
legitimate rights to the string. Options 6(a) and 6(b) may
be overkill, but I wanted to make sure all the options are
on the table. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 12pt" class="MsoNormal"><span
lang="EN-US">As requested during the call, these
questions/options are being presented for your review and
discussion within your respective groups. Please provide
any comments and/or feedback you may have <b><span
style="COLOR: red">by Sunday, February 5th</span></b>.
This will enable us to assimilate the responses prior to
our next call on February 8<sup>th</sup>. Thank you very
much in advance for your consideration and time.<br>
<br>
<b>Question 1. How should the Olympic and Red Cross/Red
Crescent Terms be Treated in the Current Application Round<br>
</b><u><br>
GAC Proposal<br>
</u>At the top level, the request is to protect the Olympic
and Red Cross terms like the words “test” and “example” in
the Applicant Guidebook (Section 2.2.1.2), extending those
terms to multiple languages and receiving consideration
during the String Similarity review. Right now, these terms
(in not every language) is in the section entitled “Strings
Ineligible for Registration” and would not invoke String
Similarity Review.<br>
<u><br>
</u></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Symbol" lang="EN-US">·
</span><span lang="EN-US"> <u>Option 1</u>: Recommend no
changes to Guidebook and reject GAC Proposal. This means
that the names set forth in 2.2.1.2.3:<br>
a) Are not considered “Reserved Names”<br>
b) Applied for strings are <u>not</u> reviewed for
similarity to the names in Section 2.2.1.2.3.<br>
<u><br>
</u></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Symbol" lang="EN-US">·
</span><span lang="EN-US"> <u>Option 2:</u> Treat the
terms set forth in Section 2.2..1.2.3 as “reserved names”
under Section 2.2.1.2. This means that:<br>
a) the names are not available as gTLD strings to anyone;
and<br>
b) applied-for gTLD strings are reviewed during the String
Similarity review to determine whether they are similar to
those in Section 2.2.1.2.3. An application for a gTLD string
that is identified as too similar to a Reserved Name will
not pass this review.<br>
c) Like other applied for gTLDs not passing String
Similarity Review, there is <u>no</u> appeal.<br>
<br>
</span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Symbol" lang="EN-US">· </span><span
lang="EN-US"> <u>Option 3</u>: Treat the terms set
forth in Section 2.2.1.2.3 as “modified reserved names”
meaning:<br>
a) The names are available as gTLD strings only to the
International Olympic Committee, International Red Cross and
Red Crescent Movement, as applicable.<br>
b) applied-for gTLD strings are reviewed during the
String Similarity review to determine whether they are
similar to those in Section 2.2.1.2.3. An application for a
gTLD string that is identified as too similar to a Reserved
Name will not pass this review.<br>
c) Like other applied for gTLDs not passing String
Similarity Review, there is <u>no</u> appeal.<br>
<br>
</span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Symbol" lang="EN-US">· </span><span
lang="EN-US"> <u>Option 4a</u> – Same as Option 2,
except there would be an appeal process for those
organizations that can demonstrate legitimate rights to the
“reserved names.” Appeal mechanism TBD.<br>
</span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Symbol" lang="EN-US">· </span><span
lang="EN-US"> <u>Option 4b</u> – Same as Option 3,
except there would be an appeal process for those
organizations that can demonstrate legitimate rights to the
“modified reserved names.” Appeal mechanism TBD.<br>
<br>
</span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Symbol" lang="EN-US">· </span><span
lang="EN-US"> <u>Option 5a</u>: Same as Option 3
except that the “modified reserve names” are available as
gTLD strings only to the International Olympic Committee,
International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement or, to
those entities receiving a letter of non-objection from the
International Olympic Committee, International Red Cross and
Red Crescent Movement as applicable. <br>
<br>
</span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Symbol" lang="EN-US">· </span><span
lang="EN-US"> <u>Option 5b</u>: Same as Option 5a but
also to include entities receiving a letter of non-objection
from a relevant government.<br>
<br>
</span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Symbol" lang="EN-US">· </span><span
lang="EN-US"> <u>Option 6a</u>: Same as Option 5a,
except that there would be an appeal process for those
entities that can demonstrate legitimate rights to the
“modified reserved names.” Appeal mechanism TBD.<br>
<br>
</span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Symbol" lang="EN-US">· </span><span
lang="EN-US"> <u>Option 6b</u>: Same as Option 5b,
except there would be an appeal process for those entities
that can demonstrate legitimate rights to the “modified
reserved names.” Appeal mechanism TBD.<br>
<br>
<b>Question 2. Should the protections set forth in Question
1 apply to languages in addition to those set forth in the
chart in Section 2.2.1.2.3? If yes, which additional
languages? <br>
</b>a) <u>Option 1</u>: No, just the languages set
forth in the Applicant Guidebook<br>
b) <u>Option 2</u>: Accept GAC Proposal stating asking
for protection in “<i>multiple languages -</i> all
translations of the listed names in languages used on the
Internet.”<br>
c) <u>Option 3</u>: Extending protections to other
languages, but a subset of languages.<br>
<u><br>
</u><b>Question 3. Should the Protections in Questions 1
and 2 apply to subsequent gTLD rounds?<br>
<br>
</b>a) <u>Option 1</u>: Yes, it should apply in all
future rounds<br>
b) <u>Option 2:</u> No, it should only apply to this
current round.<br>
c) <u>Option 3</u>: It should apply in this current
round with no decision on subsequent rounds. We should
evaluate the results of this initial round, document lessons
learned, and then decide on recommendations on subsequent
rounds based on the results of the evaluation.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 6pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto"
class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 9pt" lang="EN-US">Jeffrey
J. Neuman<span style="COLOR: #3366ff"> <br>
</span><span style="COLOR: #068658">Neustar, Inc. / Vice
President, Business Affairs</span></span></b><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #7d7d7d;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US"><br>
21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166</span><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: gray;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US"><br>
</span><b><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif';
COLOR: #068658; FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US">Office:</span></b><b><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #333333;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US"> </span></b><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #7d7d7d;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US">+1.571.434.5772</span><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #000066;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US"> </span><b><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #068658;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US">Mobile: </span></b><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #7d7d7d;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US">+1.202.549.5079</span><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: gray;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US"> </span><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #000066;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US"> </span><b><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #068658;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US">Fax: </span></b><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #7d7d7d;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US">+1.703.738.7965</span><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: gray;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US"> </span><b><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #068658;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US">/</span></b><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #3366ff;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US"> </span><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #068658;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:jeff.neuman@neustar.biz"><span style="COLOR:
#068658">jeff.neuman@neustar.biz</span></a> </span><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: gray;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US"> </span><b><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #068658;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US">/</span></b><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #3366ff;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US"> </span><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #068658;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.neustar.biz/"><span style="COLOR:
#068658">www.neustar.biz</span></a></span><span
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: gray;
FONT-SIZE: 8.5pt" lang="EN-US"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="MsoNormal"><span style="COLOR:
gray; FONT-SIZE: 8pt" lang="EN-US">
<hr style="COLOR: #969696" align="left"
noshade="noshade" size="1" width="100%">
</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto"
class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY:
'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: gray; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt"
lang="EN-US">The information contained in this e-mail
message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s)
named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the
original message.</span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New
Roman','serif'; FONT-SIZE: 12pt" lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>